ACCIDENTS:
- Clayton Rd. No Injuries. (07/29/19 – 1604 hrs.)
- El Camino Dr./Pine Hollow Rd. No Injuries. (07/30/19 – 0857 hrs.)
ARRESTS:
- None.
BURGLARIES/THEFTS:
- Keller Ridge Dr. Petty Theft – Vehicle. (07/26/19 – 1409 hrs.)
- Peacock Cr. Petty Theft – Vehicle. (07/29/19 – 1217 hrs.)
- Diablo View Ln. Petty Theft – Vehicle. (07/30/19 – 1527 hrs.)
VANDALISMS:
Eagle Peak Ave. (07/29/19 – 1925 hrs.)
Eagle Peak Ave. (07/29/19 – 1929 hrs.)
9 comments
again; no burglaries, just thefts…… More Stats manipulation by Clayton PD
Maybe the thief stole a package, or something else, from the front porch, or mail from the mailbox … as opposed to breaking into the house and taking items.
It’s not auto burglary unless the doors are locked. If the doors are unlocked, it’s petty theft. It’s not stats manipulation by Clayton PD, it’s CA law. To be charged with burglary (of any type) you have to break into a locked car, residence or commercial building.
@Kentucky Derby Thanks for the clarification, that explains it.
VEHICLE MUST BE LOCKED TO BE CONSIDERED AUTO BURGLARY
“In order to be considered auto burglary in California, a vehicle must be locked. Under California law, a vehicle is locked when there is evidence of forced entry.
Thus, there must be evidence of forced entry for an act to be considered auto burglary. So what if the vehicle is not locked? Then the crime committed is grand or petty larceny, not auto burglary.”
officer: was ur car locked and the windows up? victim: yes. officer: is there any chance that just maybe u 4got??? this happens in a circular conversation. finally the victim says: well i guess its posdible that it was unlocked but I’m pretty sure it was locked. officer in report: victim states car may have been unlocked… BAM… Theft not burglary. thats how they play the stats game.
nah, clear is theft (from vehice)
Right,my mistake. The vehicles must not have been locked?
“No burglaries just thefts”…..poor people piss me off. Glad I dont live next to your broke a$$.
Comments are closed.