The “Water Cooler” is a feature on Claycord.com where we ask you a question or provide a topic, and you talk about it.
Today’s question:
QUESTION: Do you think U.S. Deportees, including those with a violent past or gang affiliation, should be housed in El Salvador’s prisons, or do you think we should keep them in the United States?
Talk about it.
Yes
If there is no threat of substantial incarceration,
there is no deterrence to criminal behavior !
.
El Salvador now has highest incarceration rate in the world.
As a result, it now has a lower homicide rate than America.
.
Those predacious upon society have zero empathy
for their victims and should be removed from society.
.
El Salvador has a proven method for dealing with gangs
and vicious criminals.
.
Sending illegals with violent past or gang affiliation to El Salvador
has a two fold benefit, gets them out of our country and
sends a clear message, STAY OUT OF AMERICA.
El Salvador is in America!!
Yes…it is less expensive for us as taxpayers and the CECOT (maximum security prison) has helped the country go from the most violent to one of the safest thanks to Bukele’s government policies.
https://elsalvadorinfo.net/homicide-rate-in-el-salvador/
not simply deportees, they should be launched back over the border any way possible and refused entry for 10 years because they knew better. Now for the total s#!theads YES! (bangers,murder,mayhem,etc…), throw them in the darkest hellhole you can find and let them rot.
Neither. Unless they are granted for asylum, They should be deported to theirs countries of origin and let the governments decide.
No way!!!!!!
If they’re from El Salvador yes. Otherwise send them to their native countries of course.
If they are known criminals, and/or gang members, and if they have been declared
terrorists, they should be sent to El Salvador, and forget the due process. If it has been
proven that they are not criminals or affiliated with any gang, then send them back to their home country. The question is, are illegal invaders guaranteed the right to due process
under the US Constitution? The terrorists of 9/11 were sent to Gitmo without any due
process, and nobody said a word. The Dems want to argue that illegals have the same constitutional rights as American citizens, or of legal permanent residents. They do not.
For instance, it is illegal for an illegal invader to own or possess a firearm because they are
not protected by the Second Amendment. Therefore, why should they be protected by the
Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments?
Lol, I came here for the comments, they were as I expected.
if you believe in the constitution, then the answer is ‘not without due process’, the Supreme Court agrees … if you think what they say is important.