By Diana Lambert – Edsource
Legislation that would ban food containing six synthetic dyes from being served in California schools could impact what kids eat nationwide, said its author, Assemblyman Jesse Gabriel, D-Encino, at a news conference this morning.
Assembly Bill 2316, also known as the California School Food Safety Act, would prohibit California schools from offering foods containing red dye 40, yellow dye 5, blue dye 1, green dye 3, blue dye 2 and yellow dye 6. The vibrant dyes are typically found in baked goods, chips, soda and candy, and do not impact the taste of food, Gabriel said.
Research has shown that these six synthetic food dyes can cause neurobehavioral disorders, such as attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, in children, according to Gabriel. These same dyes are required to have a warning label in Europe, he said.
“It just makes no sense when the superintendent and others are out there, our teachers are working so hard to help our students achieve, that we would be putting all this effort and energy and love into our young people, and then feeding them some food at lunch or at recess that is actually going to undermine all of that good work,” said Gabriel, who was joined at the news conference by Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond.
The legislation would be the first of its kind in the nation. If passed, the bill would go into effect Dec. 31, 2027.
“We firmly believe that this bill, if signed into law, will have a national impact,” Gabriel said. “And we believe that it will prompt nationwide changes to popular foods marketing toward children. We know that because of how supply chains work, because of how food manufacturers work. We think it’s unlikely that folks are going to produce one version of their product for California and a different version for Kansas.”
The prohibition would not include food sold as part of a school fundraising event, if the sale takes place on campus at least a half-hour after the school day or is sold off campus.
The bill is among hundreds that must pass the Legislature by an Aug. 31 deadline. Gov. Gavin Newsom will then have about a month to sign or veto the bills, Gabriel said.
“It is crunch time here in Sacramento,” Gabriel said. “We have returned from our recess. We have less than one month left of our legislative session. And this bill has so far passed through the California Assembly with a strong bipartisan vote. It has passed every single policy committee. It passed the Senate Education Committee with a unanimous bipartisan vote. And we now stand, just steps away from Governor Newsom’s desk.”
12 comments
That lunch in the picture looks more like a punishment than a lunch. I guess if it doesn’t look like something served at McDonald’s the kids won’t eat it. 🙄
Nothing like having an attorney craft legislation on chemical safety in foods. I, for one, have no issue if no dyes are used, that is fine by me, but, I have extreme cause for concern when a legislator, who is a (Constitutional, apparently, to which I also am concerned) lawyer, and a democrat starts crafting laws like this. Hubris, look how smart/powerful/innovative we are “We firmly believe that this bill, if signed into law, will have a national impact,” I wish this California legislator would perhaps focus on issues that are actually driving producers away from this once golden state.
Note: I do not have time, nor desire to seek out the studies that resulted in these conclusions. My sense is an organization did studies in mice, or in vitro, administering doses of the dye at levels no human could consume with regular diets. I just cannot say. I did do a quick search on red dye 40, and discovered it is derived from petroleum (well not petroleum, which is simply crude oil, but rather a product of, naphthalene). Could this be why this, another tact at assault at the dreaded fossil fuels? Any meaningful legislation on the bums leaving trash all over those waterways and canals, you know, the ones that are fenced in to keep us out, yet are littered with tents, shopping carts and stolen bicycles?
Or, maybe we can put the responsibility to feed kids back on the parents! The schools are taking too much power away from us.
Can anyone identify what the brown blob with yellow leakage is ?
I was wondering the same thing.
Probably a good idea. As would be the idea to lift California kids up into the top 10% of schools nationwide, from the bottom 10 where they are now.
To do that, we would have to force teachers to teach actual academic subjects!
No problem giving children gender drugs or surgery with out long term studies.
No problem giving children gender drugs or surgery with no long term studies.
Get rid of the Dyes.
But something tells me that this is not actually about the Dyes.
It’s about control!
Just the other day I posted this quote from J.D. Vance
.
His wife [Michelle Obama] tells us that we shouldn’t be feeding our children certain foods, and we hate her for it—not because we think she’s wrong but because we know she’s right.”
― J.D. Vance
.
See the discussion here this seems very fitting.