A dispute over a name threatens to pit the Port of Oakland and San Francisco against each other in litigation.
San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu on Monday fired off a letter to the Port of Oakland Commission, threatening legal action if the port persisted in its plan to change the name of Oakland’s airport to “San Francisco Bay Oakland International Airport.”
Chiu called out the plan for its potential for confusion and noted it was a particularly acute problem for an “audience of international travelers” who may not speak or read English.
According to Chiu, the port’s action appeared to be designed to “intentionally divert travelers who may be unfamiliar with the relevant geography….”
Chiu asked the port to reconsider its direction and work in collaboration with San Francisco.
However, Chiu made clear that there was a steel fist inside the velvet glove: “If the Port of Oakland instead elects to proceed with the proposed name change, then unfortunately the City will have no choice other than to pursue necessary legal action.”
The legal action, according to Chiu, would include trademark infringement and dilution claims under federal and state law.
To make clear that his letter was not just a lawyerly maneuver, Chiu’s letter attached a resolution adopted by the board of supervisors that “urgently requested” the port to reject any name change that included “San Francisco” in the title.
The resolution was included as part of the board’s “Imperative Agenda” so it could be considered, voted on, and approved that same day. That agenda was reserved for matters where “the need to take action is so imperative as to threaten serious injury to the public interest if action is deferred.”
Among the identified problems that a name change would cause, according to the resolution, were confusion of the traveling public, potential for expensive mis-delivery of goods, and the violation of San Francisco’s trademarks.
The board closed the resolution stating that it was “committed to collaborating across the Bay to uplift the collective and mutual best interests of all its Bay Area neighboring cities, including Oakland…”
Chiu’s letter also attached a similar entreaty to the port by San Francisco Mayor London Breed, who emphasized the “stellar brand” of the San Francisco International Airport or SFO. She wrote that 50 million passengers used the airport in 2023 where they experienced the significant upgrades and improvements that have been undertaken at SFO over many years.
Her letter closed by stating that “Oakland is a great city with a rich history…. It is rich in culture and wonderful people and has its own unique identity. It does not need the name San Francisco as part of its airport to stand out.”
Jen Kwart, a spokesperson for the San Francisco City Attorney, resisted the suggestion that the Chiu’s letter might seem heavy-handed.
She pointed out that “tourism is a vital part of the City’s economy. The travelers, especially those with limited-English proficiency, who will inevitably end up at the wrong airport if Oakland moves forward with this proposal, may not think this is trivial.”
She went on to emphasize that the city does not seek litigation, “We have reached out to Oakland and are ready to discuss an alternative…. Litigation is a last resort and we hope to avoid it but we will resort to it if we have to. We could all avoid litigation if the Port of Oakland abandons this current proposed renaming plan.”
A port spokesperson responded to an inquiry about the letter, stating “the proposed name modification will clarify, not confuse. The new name identifies where OAK is actually located, which is on the San Francisco Bay.”
She continued, “if the proposed name modification is approved by the Board, the Port will take all appropriate measures to defend its right to use this accurate geographic identifier.”
The Port of Oakland Board of Port Commissioners is scheduled to meet to consider and act on the name change proposal at a public meeting on 3:30 PM on Thursday.
As well they should.
I see legal action in the near future…….
Other possible names,
Fallujah West, West Baghdad, Dodge City, Run the Gauntlet, democrat’s . . . . . . .
Feel free to add your suggestions
New Mogadishu
How about “Bag Lady By The Bay”.
If I’m ever a bag lady, hopin it’s Chanel and/or Gucci ☺️
Sam Brinton International has a nice ring to it.
(Libby) Schaafted
.
Shengtown
.
Ess Hole.
.
Just popped a fresh bowl of popcorn!
I rode a bus to the Oakland bus station once,called a friend for a ride in Concord.he asked me if i was crazy,and did i know how dangerous it is there and he would be there as fast as he could…about 20 min or so later,2 black guys walked past the bus station,saw me standing there holding luggage,and they backed up,looked at me,talked for a minute,and started walking over to me with bad intention’s then my friend comes flying up in his car and flings the door open and says”get in” i jumped in and we both said we knew what was just about to happen.He saved my life,and would have been just another day in Oakland.The locals know it’s a hub for travelers and they prey on them.And they kill them.
Both cities are doomed, Good way to make the poor lawyers rich.
working on name changes and fighting over them all the while our roads and infrastructure continue to crumble… I was in west oakland a couple weeks ago, someone put a traffic cone in a pothole and you could only see half of it. Disgusting.
Oakland does not fix their potholes, yet they paid out 35 million in claims for injuries caused by their potholes in the last 10 years. Talk about mismanagement! But it comes down to the Oakland voters. They’re the ones that have put in these crazy liberal progressives for the last 10 years.. and it absolutely ruined the city.
15,000 cars were stolen in Oakland last year. How’s that even possible! Businesses are leaving due to burglaries and robberies. Yet the Liberals in that City will not wake up but she’s just keep pushing further down that road.
I have to go to work there and I hate it! Got carjacked last month.. my insurance company will not renew me nor will others when they find out that I have to drive to Oakland. They said the losses are immense and there’s no improvement in sight. I’m surprised Oakland doesn’t try to change its name too to San Francisco-East.
Again, I blame the citizens who vote for these idiots to run their City.
Thats 41 car cats per day,and thats just the ones reported,more like 100 per day.Wow Oakland,youre just so cool that your people literally want the entire country to be like this.
Oaktown is doing anything they can to try and take some of the tarnish off….. SF should sue if they proceed
Why not just “The International Portal To Hell’ ?
I’m not too worried about Oakland Airport.
The crime there is internationally known.
It ranks up there with Mogadishu.
What about foreign travelers thinking they are landing in SF?They are maybe prepared for feces on their shoes but not prepared for being killed for their pocket items and travel bags.
I think it’s more of a battle of egos.
I agree, but also would like to point out that SF airport is not actually IN SF…
The Vancouver airport is actually in Richmond BC but nobody ever heard of Richmond BC
White House Parties against each other, countries against each other, cities against each other, neighbors & families against each other.
Why in HELL is this world failing ….?
The car rental facility at Oakland airport tells each person exiting not to fill up the gas tank in the area around the airport. Does that say something about Haiti West?
In N Out International Airport.
It’s fascinating that after about 30 years of failed federal court guidance and many years of police commission guidance the solution is to change name of the airport because the place has become nationally known as a nightmare of lawlessness. I was born and raised there and it breaks my heart to see it now.
So SFO is not in San Francisco, it is in a different county. The San Francisco 49ers play in Santa Clara. Maybe they should all sue San Francisco?
I thought the name change was dumb but now I hope they do it out of spite.