JWB,
.
So, now you’re back to referring to me as MAGA KNIGHT, again. Typical of your normal behavior, you go right to your MAGA innuendo, MAGA insinuations, MAGA name calling, and your MAGA obsession, all because you disagree with someone and you’re unable to win an argument.
.
For some reason you seem to think the First Amendment doesn’t apply to citizens and residents while in publicly accessible areas of public libraries, and presumably while in or on publicly accessible areas of all public properties, whether federal, state, county, city, and/or special district properties, whether inside of public buildings, outside of public buildings, or on any building-less public lands and properties. Why would you consider the possibility of First Amendment Auditor training by library staff, to avoid embarrassing videos of library staff violating the civil rights of citizens and/or residents, and avoiding civil rights lawsuits that follow those videos, as a bad thing? You must be happy when these civil rights lawsuits are settled out of court, or paid out as the result of a judgment, because public servants are unfamiliar with the law and the rights of citizens and residents.
19
10
Old Otis
March 17, 2024 - 9:22 PM 9:22 PM
They can’t do it on their OWN TIME????
Getting drunk and playing GRAB A*S?
Considering that we have so many posters on Claycord who always say they’re pro US Constitution and quote the Constitution as often as they do, I find it strange that we seem to have so many posters who appear to be anti First Amendment when those First Amendment rights are exercised in or on publicly accessible areas of publicly owned properties.
All libraries? training on the Dewey Decimal System? 🙂
Is this First Amendment Auditir training?
Sorry, I meant Auditor.
JWB,
.
So, now you’re back to referring to me as MAGA KNIGHT, again. Typical of your normal behavior, you go right to your MAGA innuendo, MAGA insinuations, MAGA name calling, and your MAGA obsession, all because you disagree with someone and you’re unable to win an argument.
.
For some reason you seem to think the First Amendment doesn’t apply to citizens and residents while in publicly accessible areas of public libraries, and presumably while in or on publicly accessible areas of all public properties, whether federal, state, county, city, and/or special district properties, whether inside of public buildings, outside of public buildings, or on any building-less public lands and properties. Why would you consider the possibility of First Amendment Auditor training by library staff, to avoid embarrassing videos of library staff violating the civil rights of citizens and/or residents, and avoiding civil rights lawsuits that follow those videos, as a bad thing? You must be happy when these civil rights lawsuits are settled out of court, or paid out as the result of a judgment, because public servants are unfamiliar with the law and the rights of citizens and residents.
They can’t do it on their OWN TIME????
Getting drunk and playing GRAB A*S?
Katherine Kreft why are they closing ?
Considering that we have so many posters on Claycord who always say they’re pro US Constitution and quote the Constitution as often as they do, I find it strange that we seem to have so many posters who appear to be anti First Amendment when those First Amendment rights are exercised in or on publicly accessible areas of publicly owned properties.