The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors took what it called “an important step to address the climate crisis by identifying strategies that use farms, gardens, parks, and open spaces to capture and store greenhouse gas emissions.”
Supervisors accepted the Healthy Lands, Healthy People report, which found significant potential in Contra Costa County to use natural and working lands to store greenhouse gas emissions, a practice also known as carbon sequestration.
Land in well-managed agriculture and healthy open space sequesters up to 70 times more carbon than any form of urban development, the county said in the report.
The Contra Costa Resource Conservation District developed plans for two urban farms, one in North Richmond and one in Pittsburg, and identified practices the farms can adopt to better capture and store carbon.
“Contra Costa County is leading in our work to look at how we can use all our lands — from prime agriculture to parks to our more urban areas — to reduce harmful emissions,” said John Gioia, chair of the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors. “We’re especially interested in helping urban farmers in our historically underserved communities produce food for themselves and their neighbors.”
The county said climate-smart practices with the greatest potential include applying compost to all land types; nutrient management, which means managing the rate, source, placement, and timing of nutrients to improve soil health; and urban forestry, which entails maintaining existing healthy trees and planting new trees.
Other practices the county mentioned include alley cropping, which is planting trees or shrubs between rows of crops, and creating riparian forest buffers, which is conserving, maintaining, and restoring forested areas next to streams, lakes, ponds, and wetlands.
“It’s expected that if the farmers follow the recommendations in the carbon farm plans, they will see better soil quality and productivity, and potential opportunities to generate revenue through participation in emerging markets for carbon offsetting towards a cooler planet,” said Ben Weise, agriculture conservation manager with the Resource Conservation District.
The farm plans identify potential funding sources to implement the different practices recommended. The Resource Conservation District also looked at the potential to sequester carbon on all agricultural lands in the county.
The University of California Cooperative Extension led the community engagement process for this project, which included focus groups across the county in person and online, as well as a survey. UCCE also developed a video that is available in both English and Spanish.
“Land managers across the county, whether involved in farming, parks management, or conservation, are clearly interested in climate smart practices. Many already employ them where they can and most would do more if there were more economic incentives,” said Kamyar Aram, UCCE specialty crops advisor. The study also shows that urban farmers would benefit from access to funding and land for urban farms.
Think air filters in room supervisors meet in should be changed.
Absolutely, need term limits.
.
Are people still supposed to rip out their lawns to conserve water ? ? ?
Hog wash
Just say your raising taxes and increasing non voter-approved regulations.
Much simpler
Maybe insist that China actually do their part. Quit pushing the USA Into the ground.
A farmer would be a fool to participate and allow more government oversight on his/her property.
.
The less government is involved, the better.
.
Sequester carbon on your property, attract animals, find a new endangered or threatened species on your property, and watch government restrict what you can do with or on your property!! Ive seen it happen!!! A property owner I know built a seasonal pond, then it became sort of a wetland, and then threatened salamanders magically moved in. Another guy left his fields fallow and all of a sudden burrowing owls created their nest in a berm. Bam! A 1000-foot buffer zone was instantly required! Nope… cant farm near the nest.
Sounds like something from the 30s. (Didn’t realize this is such a huge farming area)
Point being: Leave us alone.
Meanwhile, farmers continue to be subsidized by the US government and acting like crops such as almonds are great to farm in this area.
What a skam.
Oh FFS PLEASE stop and address some REAL problems!!!
Come plant some trees in my yard with the money(taxes) I gave you.
Next step is to put diapers on cows.
Uh huh. Something more about carbon emissions that isn’t mentioned and probably even more important. It is a source of alternate cheap energy and with some minor adapting can fuel today’s fossil fuel cars. I saw a report on it a year or two ago. Oh but we gotta have EV.
I just finally did my taxes I can’t tell you how much I wanted go rogue and not file. They waste everything I give them on stupid stuff like eco crap. The budget bills for Fed and state have millions and millions of dollars of way overpriced projects buried in them. It is criminal.
Wait a minute….. there’s gotta be a way for some of us to make money offa this too!
….yes, it’s called capitalism.
Claycord voters, can’t you see you’re being played by career whore politicians like Gioia and DeSaulnier. Until y’all stop re-electing these marginal achievers, you and your children deserve the outcomes of everything they patronize you with. Start by turning off ALL msm and fight for TERM LIMITS.
All I can think of when I see this is “we sold bottled air to those whose doctors advised a change in climate. We had three kinds: sea air; mountain air; and all-purpose air just for breathing.” Does this represent the ideology of our legislators or what?
If they did that, the air would be in plastic bottles at ambient pressure (a LOT of plastic bottles) or in compressed form at very high pressure in carbon fiber wound cylinders.
they spent millions just planning this……..
The cost of fertilizers and pesticides, plus having to buy trade-marked seeds from the same Big Ag companies that make the chemicals, means a farmer’s cost of production massively eats into any profit he might make from his crops. Not having to buy those costly chemicals, and instead growing crops on soil that is again naturally healthy and productive, means they have more money in their pockets.
Turning to regenerative farming is a win for farmers. More farmers are realizing this, too, and are wanting to learn how to farm without the use of costly chemical fertilizers and pesticides.
If they would simply stop talking imagine how much hot air the planet would be spared. Climate crises solved.
The Savory Institute has been doing this for a very long time. It is called regenerative agriculture and it involves large groups of herding animals. As it turns out, our grasslands are a much larger source of carbon absorption, than we originally knew.
Keep voting for idiots, this is the result.