By Tony Hicks –
When the Concord City Council discussed a rent stabilization ordinance for nearly five hours at a meeting earlier this month, the emotionally charged conversation attracted 67 public speakers, by one count.
Rent is obviously a hot button issue in a community where, between 2011 and 2021, median gross rents increased 62 percent, according to the city.
Higher rents affect nearly everyone who doesn’t own homes. But tenant advocates say high rents likely impact seniors in Concord harder than other groups, as 58 percent of area seniors — according to the Association of Bay Area Governments — are very low-income.
That means about 2,000 households in Concord are vulnerable to displacement, according to the East Bay Alliance for a Sustainable Economy, a tenants rights advocacy group. The group says about 29 percent of unhoused people in Contra Costa County are over 55.
When public comment closed from the Sept. 5 meeting, the item was continued to the next meeting. The council was supposed to make its decision Tuesday, but canceled the meeting.
Many people in their 70s and 80s spoke at the Sept. 5 council meeting and carried signs and chanted at a protest including about 30 people outside the council chamber before the meeting.
“I live in Concord. And these are supposed to be my golden years,” said 73-year-old Doreena Coon before the meeting. “But I’m still working because I can’t afford to live on my own.”
Coon was with her autistic client and roommate, for whom she’s paid $16 an hour to take care of, and with whom she splits $2,200 monthly rent.
“He doesn’t make much money either. So I take care of him to live,” Coon said. “We rent a house (and) pay half and half because neither of us could do it on our own. And it’s so important because the rents go up, but our wages do not. And it’s scary.”
Concord’s proposed Residential Rent Stabilization Ordinance, which — like ordinances in Richmond and Antioch — would cap rent increases at 3 percent annually, or 60 percent of the consumer price index, whichever is lower.
It would also require just cause for evictions of tenants living in a unit for at least a year. Just cause includes non-payment of rent, criminal activity, material breach of a lease, refusing to allow the owner access, refusal to sign a new lease with similar provisions and duration, and subletting the unit in violation of the lease.
The proposal wouldn’t affect units built since 1995 or landlords with four or fewer units.
Josh Anijar is the director of the Contra Costa Central Labor Council, which represents 86 unions and about 87,000 workers in Contra Costa County.
He spoke to the group outside before the Sept. 5 meeting, saying afterward he has heard “so many stories of seniors and workers being harassed by landlords here.”
Anijar said he has seen people priced out of San Francisco and Oakland, only to come to places like Concord, where history repeats itself.
“People can’t afford to live in their houses,” Anijar said. “People can’t afford to live in the communities they have been in for their entire lives, and raised families, and they’re being priced out.”
Landlords speaking at the meeting frequently cited California’s Assembly Bill 1482, a three-year-old law capping rent increases at 5 percent, plus the rate of inflation, which together can’t exceed a 10 percent annual increase.
They also brought up the economic damage of the COVID-19 pandemic, when they were affected by eviction and rent moratoriums.
“Meanwhile, the year over year increase in garbage service was over 15 precent for 2023 alone,” said Concord landlord Tammy Chen. “In addition, for liability insurance, which we need in order to operate, that increased year over year — the premium was nearly 300 percent. So due to COVID, it has been extremely expensive and difficult for us to perform even simple repairs.”
Chen said landlords also deal with annual inspections, registries and ongoing repairs to aging properties and the behavior of some tenants.
“As it is, it has been nearly impossible for us to stay in business, much less make a profit,” Chen said.
One landlord went as far as to say rent control is unconstitutional. Other landlords pointed to San Francisco and Oakland as examples of what rent control does to neighborhoods, inviting crime and other problems by limiting a landlord’s ability to pay for upkeep.
“This council doesn’t seek to limit other small businesses’ ability to charge for their products and services, but yet somehow — because I chose to buy a small rental property and incorporate myself for insurance liability purposes — I am being told how much I can charge and who I can keep in my property,” said Blaine Carter.
Carter pointed to “massive inflationary cost for materials and labor required to keep my property clear, and safe, and appealing to the community versus turning into a ghetto appearance.”
“If small businesses and rental property is such a lucrative business, well, how come then I still have to keep my day job?”
Carter said “And how come I had to borrow money against my 401K to buy a property? And why aren’t any of you in the business if it’s so lucrative and I’m making so much money?”
The Rev. Marie Wilson is the pastor at Concord United Methodist Church. She attended with members of her congregation, praying before the Sept. 5 meeting.
“We have an intergenerational congregation, but mostly seniors,” Wilson said. “I’m standing here to represent the seniors so that they are able to live without their retirement in the city that they work so hard for their homes to keep.”
Wilson said people are living longer now, forcing cities and counties to consider seniors’ needs more.
“However, this is the moral obligation that we all have to work with the community to keep our community safe and keep everyone calm, right?” Wilson said.
Kristi Laughlin, the deputy director for Contra Costa County for the East Bay Alliance for a Sustainable Economy, said seniors have different needs compared to other renters that need consideration.
“The hard part is often they’re physically challenged because of health issues, fragility, (and) mobility challenges. So the hard part is I think they’ve been ignored and marginalized in this conversation. And yeah, so I think we need to speak, raise and amplify their voice.”
Housing activists said Wednesday a diverse coalition of faith leaders, tenant groups, community members, and seniors, will hold a press conference and rally at 11 a.m. Thursday in front of Concord City Hall before delivering 1,000 signatures to the City Council, calling for tenant protections.
“That means about 2,000 households in Concord are vulnerable to displacement” is a good hint. If you are living in a situation that you can’t afford then you will be displaced to a less comfortable, but hopefully more affordable, situation. That’s true, regardless of your age. Hoping that uncle Joe or uncle Don will continuously bail you out is poor plan. Ideally, both of them will be asking you to create a business plan that demonstrates how you can live within your means. It starts with you agreeing to be less comfortable.
What if they are already uncomfortable? Not everyone had the means in their lifetime to make their retirement comfortable. Even if they saved in their productive years inflation since then has ruined that. Maybe there should be an option to volunteer to pay more to pay more into SS for a higher payout when you retire. I have collected way more in benefits than what I put in to SS.
Ricardoh, there is a way to pay more into SS and receive a bigger payout: earn more during your working years! The government has also provided additional ways to save for retirement: Individual Retirement Accounts and 401(k)s. Social Security was always intended to be a safety net, not the sole means of support.
El D
Not when you are a low wage earner and have bills to pay and a family to raise.
And if a person has the money why put more into SS so the government can use the workers money on more crap like unnecessary wars etc. If they have that kind of money investments are better
Investments may be better but do you think the majority of the people know how to invest properly? Not a chance.
Most people that end up short of cash didn’t make enough to take advantage of any of that. The real problem is inflation. The same democrats that proclaim to be for the little guy are killing them. Joe is just talking about restricting more offshore drilling sites which will put gas at $8 a gallon and prices everywhere else will go up with it.
Those people that continue to depend on the government for a handout for rent or anything else, such as section 8 are parasites. Poor life decisions should not be the responsibility of the taxpayers. if you can’t afford or can’t pay, move somewhere else, or there’s always room under the freeway. No compassion for these losers and moochers.
American Citizen
You sanctimonious toad. Let me see you move when your investments take and corporate America takes away your pension. Most of these people have worked hard and have been screwed by corporate greed.
Not everyone has the same opportunities. They don’t have mommy and daddy help bankroll their adult lives. Some save for 15-20 years to buy their first home is they can buy at all. Some work 30 hr a week while being a full time student and still have the loans with hideous interest to pay off. Some go to work for companies that we all thought were good places to work and in the end laid-off a year before retirement thus making them ineligible for the retirement they worked for or are forced into early retirement and get a fraction of what is due to them.
Get a freakin clue cllueless
Most of the people who are collecting from the handouts from the government (welfare, section 8, etc) have worked hard and been screwed by corporate greed? That is your argument?
Not buying that. Maybe some, but not most.
The vast majority made poor life choices that have put them in a position where they need to rely on others for their needs. Well, not everyone wants to take care of everyone. I will take care of my parent and in-laws if they need help, but not others.
If you don’t have the money, reduce your expenses, share expenses … figure it out.
I would bet a dollar your parents helped buy your house or paid your college tuition.
What are landlords supposed to do? Just look at your property tax and insurance bills
Lou
Most properties are now owed by foreign corporations. It is a profit machine for them and their governments.
When I lived in a townhouse development in Concord there was a Chinese funnel company that came in and bought 10 units during the housing crash. We found out they were doing this all over Concord.
So don’t feel bad for “landlords”
Unlike California DEM politicians, British Columbia addressed the problem,
“For a period of two years starting January 1, 2023, non-Canadians are banned from purchasing homes in Canada under the definition of “residential property” indicated in the legislation and associated regulations that the federal government published on December 21, 2022.”
https://www.bcrea.bc.ca/advocacy/federal-foreign-buyers-ban-is-in-effect/
.
‘Reality check—foreign buyers aren’t buying up B.C.’s housing stock’
https://tinyurl.com/53t892hk
.
Foreign buyers moved south to Seattle, Portland and CA.
Seattle market got too hot and they’ve increased buying in CA.
.
CA State legislature doesn’t have the back bone to pass legislation to force out foreign cash buyers and make homes affordable.
It isn’t easy getting old. Never was I guess, but I remember when Grandparents lived with their kids. Now, not so much. What can you do with a greedy landlord? I have no idea.
Garbage, insurance, Sewer Fees which are on property Taxes, have all gone up double digits for 3 years in a row compounded.
Repairs are double over same period. A roof now is like 15k where 3 years ago I did one for 8k.
These are real costs that will never come down.
Another step towards socialism. Making landlords eat up more costs because tenants cannot pay and housing costs rise. If you cannot afford to live in an area, move. Don’t expect the landlord to cover your costs. Any body who is a landlord in California should sell and get out. Socialist Utopia is upon us.
The same goes for the owner, If you cannot afford it please get out. I am a republican but I definitely agree renters in California are getting the short end of the stick. Honestly how often are you really paying for the upkeep on a house you rent out? once every 10 years or so? While owners are pocketing thousands a month. This was all caused by greed which you will never take with you when you pass on. Look at both ends of the spectrum please.
Thousands of dollars each month?! Yeah, no. Most landlords are happy to get a couple of hundred dollars a months in cash. Yeah, maybe some equity increase, but it ain’t thousands of dollars a month.
So, you have never owned a house, then. That is the conclusion we can all reach when you say that houses only need maintenance every 10 years. And THIS depicts the uniformed masses that we are fighting against that say they want free rent and housing “is a right.”
I am tired of politicians telling me how much to charge for rent.Cost go up way more than 3%.If you can’t afford it move somewhere else.Am I supposed to loose my investment for my retirement because of blood sucking city officials.Enough is enough it’s time for a revolution.
This is Slow China Joe paying back his supporters with the highest inflation we have had in a very long time. You get what you vote for.
.
Rent “Stabilization” means RENT CONTROL imposed by government.
.
Landlords need to raise their rents before any “stabilization” is adopted.
.
If they can’t pay, they must be evicted. The gravy train of Covid has come to an end. No more mooching.
Why should renters pay for a landlords new roof? It is not the renters house, it belongs to the owner not the renter.
My renters (yes plural) pay for the entire house. Now yes, we had to come up with the down payment, which the renters did not. To do that we had to save and scratch by for years. We saved enough so that our tenants rent covers our mortgage, taxes and insurance and it gives us extra every month to help pay for repairs and line our pockets.
If my renters could not afford to pay the rent that covers everything, than they are not renting from us. That is simple. I expect my renters payment to cover all expenses with the property.
And to be crystal clear, we have not raised rent in 4 years, and we have no plans to.
Right. So, landlords should be able to charge whatever they want FOR THEIR PROPERTY. See how that works?
Wear and tear over time… it’s called “amortization.”
.
And paint isnt there just to make the house look good… it’s a protective coating that needs to be periodically replaced. Same with plumbing fixtures (corrosion), furnaces (motors), A/C (motors and pumps), water heaters (corrosion, burners), etc. These things have a life cycle.
.
Capiche?
.
Kad if a landlord can’t make enough rent to maintain the house you live in guess what?You are going to be homeless.You need to study basic economics.Better yet buy a house and rent it out.You are going to be enlightened.
If I can’t afford a home in a certain area then I buy else where. If you can’t afford the rent then you go else where.
FPN and you others… you are obviously not a senior living on a fixed income. The average social security check is $1700. The average rent in Concord is $2200. You tell those who worked all their lives, raising families and have lived in Concord, often in the same home/apartment for years. Yeah, just move. You all are people who obviously couldn’t care less about our aging population. Shame on you. Remember most people are one paycheck away from homelessness. That might be you someday.
If you can’t afford it, move out. Pretty simple math.
You’re not entitled to reside forever in a rental unit. It’s subject to market forces… market forces that government should stay out of.
.
“Caring”? Oh please!! Renting is a business arrangement executed with a contract. Nothing more. Cannot abide by the terms or renewal? Then it’s time for you to move on. PERIOD.
.
ITSME, I am a senior and I am not a landlord. I own a few homes but due to goverment regulations, I will never rent them out. The goverment has made it hard to remove dead beat renters and who wants to deal with that. More rules and regulations will only make matters worse. I worked hard for my family to live rent free in my homes. The goverment keeps interfering there will be no homes to rent. Then what?
Rent control is putting a bandaid on the problem and it’s unfair to landlords. What we have is a supply and demand problem. Rents are high because we don’t have enough housing. The Bay Area will always have a problem due to geography. We are limited by ocean and hills. But we are also limited by rampant NIMBY-ism. Anytime a developer tries to build an in-fill project, the neighbors are up in arms. Build an apartment building on a vacant lot in downtown Concord and include a few affordable units? No! It will attract THOSE people. Build on the weapons station land? No! Too much traffic. Even senior living communities get opposition. A developer is trying to build one on vacant land in WC and the neighbors are up in arms. Wasn’t a seniors complex shot down in Clayton a few years ago? We need to stop opposing housing if we want affordable places to live for Granny and Gramps and for young couples starting out in life. If we want to attract new businesses to the area, then we need to have housing their employees can afford.
I’m amused by the folks saying you should leave if you can’t afford the rent here. How many of you have owned your home for many years and are paying peanuts in property taxes because of Prop 13? Newer home buyers are paying much more in property taxes because you don’t pay your fair share. How about we repeal Prop 13 and let all property taxes be based on the true current value of a house. How many of you would still be saying “if you can’t afford it, move”.
Good idea ED. Lets do away with prop 13 and see how much rent will go up. The whole idea of prop 13 is to make it affordable for seniors to stay in their house. The situation we are in was created by government policies. People don’t want low-income housing in their neighborhood because in this day of lawlessness they don’t want their nice safe neighborhood destroyed with crime and garbage and drugs. It happens everywhere it is built. If you don’t believe that go, check out anywhere they have built low-income housing, and you will see how nice it looks. I’m not talking about seniors housing where they have strict rules.
Time to move to a more affordable state. There are many better places than Corruptifornia…
@SIM….”Better” in what respect?….You’re about 95% correct, you can’t find another place in the US that has better weather. That to me is the biggest determinating factor, I like to be comfortable.
Sun I see very few of the habitual complainers of CA actually moving. Talk is cheap
Rent stabilization is indeed controversial and mobilizes the landlords.
I would rather see the end of ‘no fault evictions’, which might be an easier sell.
If you have kids in school, moving out of the area is not easy. The longer people stay in an area, the more they contribute to the community.
I guess I’m saying it’s not just a financial issue, it’s the landlord’s house, but the tenant’s home.
Does anyone remember Milton Freeman?
He had all the right answers for a thriving economy.
I’d love to live in Moraga. I can’t afford it. I’m not gonna go to the city council and tell them they need to control rents so that I can live there. Live where you can afford. Don’t depend on the government or the taxpayers for a handout. Too many people eat the government trough.
Does anyone remember all of he people that balled on there house payments in 2008. Wonder how many are upset at rent now. They blamed banks for the problem and walked away.
Listen to Dave Ramsey, and most can be comfortable if they worked their whole life, and always saved and invested a little. He also advocate buying rental property with cash only. I wish I would have found him 20 -25 years ago. I’m doing okay, but I could be doing better. The 2008 recession hurt me bad, because I was on commission only and my business disappeared. I have rebuilt, no debt, savings, 401k, car paid for. I agree rent is outrageous in this area, I also agree that those who own rentals need to profit, they can’t give away their apartments. However, if it is paid for, they will have less stress when something goes wrong, roof, heater etc.
I remember a teacher telling me “Life isn’t fair”, and at the time, I fought tooth and nail to prove him wrong. Fast forward and those have become the wisest words that I heard in my youth.
Home builders built monster homes for more profit. That is until no one can afford the monster home (let alone the energy bills for them). This is one goofy state. After it crashes and burns then it will all get sorted out…. maybe.
When I was young and lived in Sonoma County . Around the early 1950s, they built homes in Petaluma that a person working in a gas station could afford to buy.
The middle class have been losing out. A good friend of mine told me that his dad owned a printing press in Whittier, and all the guys working for him could afford a modest house and a car. My friend was born in 1952, so we are talking about late fifties into the sixties.
I have a buddy in New York … been living in Lower East Side flat since 1969ish … still pays 150 usd for a studio above a super famous jazz bar … crazy how these greedy mo-fos operate in SF Bay Area … sick F’s
The comments on Claycord are disgusting.. Figures you trolls say whatever when it’s anonymous, thank God most of you old farts are chest deep in your graves already! The fact that rent is so high is absurd.. I’m sure even landlords are upset at the rising gas prices but hey the gas companies can charge whatever they want because it’s their company. May as well start charging $15/gallon for gas because people will have to pay it right? Let’s raise taxes by 75%, and let’s start charging $200,000 for a single smartphone. McDonald’s should start charging $14.99 for a single McChicken. They should start charging $10/minute you’re on a government owned highway. Why not!? Let’s go crazy with the capitalism.
Not that old, at least do not feel it.
You want cheaper rent, move. We own multiple properties, not because mommy and daddy helped us, but because we worked hard, lived on less than our paycheck, ate cheap, did not travel, did not buy new cars, did work ourselves and SAVED money.
You want cheaper rent, lower your expectations. Learn to accept that the world owes you NOTHING. If you want something, earn it. Yeah, it might be a struggle. I want to retire by the time I am 60. It has been my goal for 10 years now, and I have worked towards that goal by saving and nesting money because I do not want to pull on Social Security till I am 67.
I do not like the rising costs, just paid $5.49 for regular at Costco on Sunday, but guess what, I do not have a choice.
I am sorry you are bent out of shape about the reality that you cannot afford that penthouse on your McDonald’s salary, but that is reality. That is life. Inflation sucks, you can thank our current political leadership for that, but as a landlord I owe you NOTHING. I have the right to charge what I want for MY property. If you do not like it, do not rent from me.
This would be a fine argument if you were selling watches or grapefruit. It does not work for housing. The problem is that it is not a “free market” — the supply is artificially constrained by many complicated factors. Without the ability to substantially increase supply, the public ends up subsidizing landlord profits such as yours through public assistance programs for folks who cannot afford any housing from wages, due to rents being overheated. I think many people realize this is not a good situation. Rent stabilization does not fix everything but it is one way to help alleviate the problem. It is certainly better than sitting on our hands.
So Bill
Landlords should be punished by not allowing them to make a profit after they managed to scrape money together to buy a property?
Sorry, don’t like the prices, move. That is simple. Empty rental properties will drive rent down – look at San Francisco during the start of Covid and the mass exodus of working from home.
I know many folks I work with that commute an hour each way or work night shifts to allow them to afford a place to live. My commute, when I go to the office, is 1.5 hours each way. I live where I live because it is what I could afford. See I can’t afford to live near where I work … so I don’t complain about it, I accept it and move on in life without asking for free handouts.
Well, Bill, since you brought it up, I’ll point out the Law of Supply and Demand can no more be overturned by an act of government than the Laws of Physics can. And, in fact, any action taken by the government almost always serves to stifle supply.