By Tony Hicks –
The Bay Area is home to two of the nation’s three most powerful politicians in Vice President Kamala Harris and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi. It’s one of the most politically involved regions in the U.S. and is credited as the birthplace of the modern Free Speech Movement.
So why can’t it find enough people to run for its city councils?
At least five Bay Area cities have canceled entire or partial city council elections this year because of a lack of candidates, opting to appoint the only people filing. Danville, Lafayette, Hillsborough, Mill Valley, and Cotati cancelled their whole council elections.
“Municipalities have the ability, per the elections code, to cancel their contest if less than or the exact number of candidates have filed for the available seats,” said Dan Miller, who manages candidate filing for the Marin County Elections Department. “This doesn’t happen often, but it’s not unusual.”
Local election officials say the movement from at-large elections (where the highest vote-getters win, regardless of address) to district elections (in which one person represents select neighborhoods based on geography or interest) is the root cause of elections being canceled.
City council districts used to be for bigger cities like San Francisco, San Jose and Oakland. The landscape started changing after the California Voting Rights Act of 2001 was passed.
The law says at-large elections are discriminatory if they impair the ability of a protected class to elect candidates of its choice or otherwise influence an election. But the law doesn’t force cities to switch.
“Most jurisdictions do that of their own volition, to avoid lawsuits,” said Jim Irizarry, the assistant chief election officer of San Mateo County. “More people are accusing discrimination in at-large elections.”
The 2001 law gives underrepresented groups living in the same part of a city the ability to elect someone they feel represents their interests.
“As districts split into smaller sub-districts (trustee or council areas), there may be less competition for each seat as the pool of potential candidates gets smaller,” said John Gardner, the assistant registrar of voters for Solano County. “We’ve observed this pattern in 2018 and 2020 local contests as more districts moved to additional split districts vs. at-large contests.”
District elections can dramatically alter the local political landscape. For example, instead of one council election, Redwood City now has seven.
The flip side is saving money. Danville saved an estimated $64,000 to $96,000 by re-appointing its two council members up for re-election this year. Lafayette saved between $38,000 and $57,000, according to a staff report.
Napa is also without challengers for its two open spots, but still chose to go ahead with the election in November.
“They could’ve canceled the election,” said John Tuteur, the Napa County Registrar of Voters. “It will cost them about $80,000 to put the two unopposed incumbents on the ballot.”
“We did it for a couple reasons,” said Napa City Councilmember Bernie Narvaez. “People still get to vote, or not vote. I don’t want to remove that right of a person to vote. And (if there’s no election) then we’d have two appointed council members. They should be elected.”
With no challengers, Woodside also could’ve canceled this year’s council election, as it has only incumbents running for two open seats.
“They re electing to have candidates on the ballot because they want to offer the chance for write-in candidates,” said Irizarry.
While cities like Suisun City (the mayoral race has no challengers) and Watsonville (three out of four districts had one candidate file) didn’t completely cancel elections, council spots are going to the only people running in their district.
Napa went to district elections in 2020. Narvarez said previous discrimination lawsuits against cities without district voting were “a trigger point.”
“But it does bring more equity to the election process,” said Narvaez, who considers himself part of the Latinx community. “It’s more of a focus-based election, though I think there’s still a learning curve.”
I live in Concord and we a have new candidates by the name of Robert Ring
I thank this may be his first political run.
I have talked to Robert and seem to be very smart. ITS TIME FOR SOME MEW FACES ON CONCORD’S CITY COUNCIL.
I don’t know anything about him but I sure do agree with you about needing new council members! We also need to elect our Mayor rather than the position filled by rotation.
OH WELL !!
I would like a definition of “The modern free speech movement”. What is that, and why is it being used like it’s associated with democrats? The bay area is home of silicon valley who is taking orders from democrats to suppress free speech, freedom of thought, and freedom of expression. This whole article is gaslighting propaganda.
Nobody is running because they could literally be killed for speaking out against the commies in this area. Yeah that’s what it is 100%. No democrat or republican would dare speak against any of pelosi’s army. Don’t believe me, try it.
Exactly.
Doh,I mean Me,what planet are you on.?
You seem to be stuck with page one open on the liberal playbook.
Sorry all the 10 year olds have moved along,nobody’s buying it.
If that was sarcasm though, I will give it an A+
Pardon me, Me….. but did you actually mean “coons”?
Maybe that was a typo?
Doc, give him the doubt I think he meant GOONS. The rest of it was worse.
Democrats believe in your right to say whatever you want. They also believe in your right to lose your job, have your family harassed and humiliated, and be “investigated” by the IRS and the FBI if you say anything they don’t like. Real freedom lovers, they are.
@Me
Every single thing you said is wrong.
A few words on FREE SPEECH, and how the left supports it –
Political commentator Tomi Lahren was scheduled to speak at the University of New Mexico last week. However, a large crowd of angry children (protesters) gathered outside the event, demanding that Lahren not be permitted to speak on their special campus.
Why?
Because that big ol’ meanie Lahren has a different worldview than that of the privileged bratty children.
The poor upset children banged the doors of the venue until they had boo-boos on their little hands as they attempted to break in. There was also a whole buncha foot stomping and hand wringing
They held placards with slogans such as “UNM has no room for racists” and “F*** white supremacy,” and chanted slogans like, “Shut it down,” and, “F*** Tomi Lahren.”
But in the end, all was not lost, because they had a really, really fun day pretending to be responsible grown-ups. The after party must have been a grand time too, with all that hand-shaking, back-slapping, and pipe-passing.
Sam is right!
And I will add that while the Bay Area may have been the birthplace of supposedly freedom of speech it does no longer exist. Once those people were given their freedom to speak and now they’re in power they are not giving anyone else a freedom to speak. Hypocrites! (Or worse than that, and evil plot: once they brought their crazy liberalism in they don’t want anyone else to speak up or expose it so they’ll go to any lengths to shut everyone else up)
Also, are we refusing to talk about the many ridiculous pseudo-threats from rightwing groups towards election workers? That they will be essentially obstructing them from doing their jobs under the guise of “fairness”? They apparently at least have the decency to write them and provide a heads-up.
I believe that those election workers at the polls in 2020… you know the ones who were kicking poll watchers out and covering windows with cardboard so that nobody could see what they were doing in there, yeah those guys….. they were not “right wing” and “fairness” was nowhere to be found in the USA that day.
Hell, there were votes arriving in the mail days after the election and still being counted !
Some postal workers even reported being ordered to postmark ballots as arriving days earlier than they received them.
No evidence of fraud ?….. you’d have to be deaf & blind to believe that.
In Clayton the mayor Peter Cloven, who has done some really nasty stuff to those he disagrees with, recently wrote a column lamenting the election of 2018 because one of his pals got booted from office. If it were up to him Clayton would cancel the election and he and his friends would “appoint” others who agree with him 100% all the time. After all voters are too stupid to understand how complicated it is to run a city. All those parades and events he has to attend. And you all have to be nice to him and never question him or his friends. Pay the new parcel tax he wants or else! Now shut up and get drunk at Oktoberfest because that brings in sales tax!
Is the Martinez Mayor stepping down?
We can make this a bigger issue than it really is – OH the drama.
Not enough people are stepping up to face the challenge of an election – city council?
Maybe we can help the communities facing this issue by turning down the rhetoric – stop the divisive “ME not THEM” rhetoric and get to a place that talks about issues. Please, let’s try . . .
Or we could just return to the election system tried, tested and proven for decades before the “equity” crowd showed up.
Yes, that would be those hateful and discriminatory city- and district-wide elections. In which the candidates have to work and try to represent the entire population of the city. Instead of one tiny patch or a specific ethnic group.
I’d run, but all those high school shenanigans wound up on my permanent record.
Funny how you complain anonymously, while complaining about how others complain anonymously.
This is the self awareness level of California voters, and why we will never get out of the one party hole we are stuck in.
Apparently “itsme” is the individual’s true name. After all, we know that the democrat voters in California would NEVER employ double standards…
Perhaps the “cost” of running for office is keeping those capable of working in political office from actually risking their lives (and livelihoods) – just by running. I was disowned and blacklisted when I was “outed” (as not being for the candidate supported by my corporation). It shouldn’t be this risky to just vote. It should also kept “confidential.” Being as I work in tech – the damage was permanent.
I am amazed at the Dems pretending they are the voice of free speech and equality. Dems are the party of the KKK and the Martha Vineyards elites.