By Olivia Wynkoop – Wildfires are nothing new in California’s history, but the magnitude and frequencies of recent fires across the state has proven that these disasters won’t be leaving anytime soon, experts say.
And for communities on the border of wildland and urban areas, also known as the Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI), that means their risk of danger or property destruction is only increasing without proper mitigation.
The record-breaking wildfire season of 2020 saw 4.2 million acres burnt statewide, and 2021 is already bringing a hot and heavy start to the fire season.
Fires are hitting urban areas more frequently than before, and the intensity brings devastating effects to the community, said Michael Gollner, an assistant professor of mechanical engineering at University of California at Berkeley who specializes in fire model development and emissions.
“We’re not talking about a fire that went through brush, we’re talking about a fire that jumped over a multiple-lane highway through commercial area and into a suburban community,” Gollner said in reference to the major losses during the 2017 Tubbs Fire in the North Bay. “This is a different beast we’re tackling.”
Along with Gollner, a coalition of wildfire, environmental and health experts across state agencies and University of California campuses held a webinar Wednesday morning to discuss what we know (and don’t know) about WUI fires, and how research-backed solutions can mitigate their effects.
Susan Hubbard, the associate laboratory director for the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, said that fires from the past few years have revealed the need for research on all fronts.
“Wildfire is, in essence, an indivisible challenge,” Hubbard said. “That means that it can’t be tackled by any single technology or approach, any single discipline or any single organization.”
Building resilient forests
Forest management does not mean preventing fires at all costs. We actually need more fires in our forests, called prescribed fires, to prevent the catastrophic blazes the state has seen, said Jessica Morse, deputy secretary for California Natural Resources Agency’s Forest Resources Management.
Fires do have their benefits in forest ecology: for example, they can help geminate seeds and clear out dead vegetation. The recent violent fires go beyond nature’s routine clearance, and are a result of anti-fire forest management approaches, Morse said.
“What we’ve been seeing in fire-suppressed forests is that they’re too dense. The fire goes into the tree canopy and it actually kills everything, rather than just weeding out weaker species and weaker trees, and it burns deep and hot and devastates the watershed, too,” Morse said.
One main goal for the state’s forest management is reducing these fuel loads to their natural intensity, so that when a fire does come through, they burn at a natural, controlled rate. Morse said that less fuel means less heat intensity, and fewer embers that fly off into communities.
Fuel breaks, which are gaps of land in forests that have minimal vegetation, are one of the strategies Morse suggests implementing, especially around roadsides. 30 to 60 percent of vegetation can be cleared between a row of trees to lower heat intensity, and it gives first responders a change to make their way into a fire easier.
“We saw in Paradise, an 8-mile-long fuel break that arrested the flank of the Camp Fire and saved the town of Stirling City,” Morse said. “We’ve seen these in action over and over last summer, emergency fuel breaks that had been put in just saved lives and got people out of really dynamic fires.”
Prescribed fires have already played a role in protecting WUI areas in places like Florida, which sometimes burns more than 2 million acres annually, according to Lenya Quinn-Davidson from UC Agriculture & Natural Resources.
“If any of you have traveled in Florida, or maybe some of you have even burned in Florida, you’re often right near homes, you’re seeing smoke right behind the grocery store, in the back 40 on private property,” Quinn-Davidson said. “Prescribed fire is part of the culture there, and it’s really integrated in and amongst human habitation, so it’s a great example and somewhere we should really be looking to understand the role of prescribed fire.”
There are some roadblocks, however, and fuel reduction isn’t the only solution to fire management, she said. The first steps involve getting more community members trained, strategic projects planned out and adequate equipment supplies, along with greater relief funds and liability protections.
“If we invest in people and build capacity, the acres will follow,” she said.
Community hardening
Creating “defensible spaces” and “hardening homes” are two buzzword tactics that circled Wednesday’s discussion, and with good reason: a recent Cal Fire damage inspection revealed that 93 percent of all structures that catch fire will be completely destroyed, and 70 percent of those structures are homes.
“It goes without saying, and we already knew this, that we want to prevent structures from igniting in the first place. That’s the goal, because once they ignite, the chances of limiting the damage become very minimal,” said Steve Hawks, staff chief of the Wildfire Planning & Engineering Division for Cal Fire.
Cutting back vegetation and burnable fuels on private property is one way to make a defensible space, along with a few home adjustments like adding weather stripping around the garage door or covering attic vents with fire-resistant mesh panels.
Materials used to build a structure also makes a difference. Structures built after the 2008 California Building Code Chapter 7A, designed for standards for buildings in high-risk fire areas, are less likely to be destroyed, Hawks said.
One of the greatest challenges in hardening communities is retrofitting the older structures that aren’t meeting these standards, which might require expensive renovations like roof or window replacements. The state currently plans to allocate funds for homeowners in WUI areas effective January 2022 in its Home Hardening Program.
Researchers admit that the full extent of structure-to-structure fire spread in WUI areas and standard test methods based on realistic exposure are still unknown.
“We know that home hardening actions work, but we need to the science to help us determine additional home hardening actions, because home hardening can be very costly,” Hawks said. “Wherever we can determine good mitigation strategies that lower the cost of implementation will help us out with the hundreds of thousands of structures that are out there that need retrofitting.”
Landscape scale strategies
Broad data patterns on climate change, frequency of fires or dry vegetation do not tell the whole story on California’s wildfire problems, according to Max Moritz, statewide wildfire specialist at the UC Cooperative Extension. People and the changes they’ve made to the landscape matter, too.
“That’s because we have done a lot of things to our landscape at finer scales,” Moritz said. “Look at the power line infrastructure. We’ve got road networks, we’ve got housing developments at different densities across the landscape.”
Moritz, with the help of other researchers and Cal Fire, created a map that shows which areas need fuel treatments and other preparations the most.
Probability patterns have the potential to act as guidance in future housing developments to limit growth in WUI areas. Traditionally, development begins in urbanized areas until it eventually sprawls out into less dense parts of the landscapes, and this increases fire probabilities, Moritz said.
“Our development drives our exposure and the hazard,” Moritz said.
Well I’m so glad both experts and scientists are in on this I’m sure they will make a difference..NOT.
Maybe the CDC needs to get involved also.
Big brains will keep TALKING about it for another 5 years again, while nothing important is done about it.
Trump was right again, Recall Gavin Newsom.
if the land was better managed it wouldn’t be the problem it is
.
It’s predictable… the result of all these new studies will be more regulations, government and district administration, which, in turn, will result in more fees, taxes, and costs. These will be touted as “common sense” requirements and consequences.
.
… for your “safety”.
.
.
Yup – more talk, more studies, more bureaucracies, more regulations and laws, more taxes….
And it’s gonna feed on itself.
And nothing will get done.
Thanks a lot, dumbocrats.
The northern Sierra especially around Mt Lassen looks like Swiss cheese on a satellite view because clear cut logging as been rampant over the past few years. Open Apple map switch to satellite view and zoom down until you see all the little dots which are each new to recent 20 acre clear cuts
It is obvious just from looking that the whole are is being logged unsustainably and it looks like it spreading southwards over the last year to areas near Bear Valley and even Tahoe. Some of the lands are private but it looks like some are also public.
I think last years fire season was a fiasco due to Newsom letting things burn
I also think that Democrats in Sacramento have failed to look after our forests responsibly and may even be profiting from the timber sales
Sierra Club is AWOL not a peep from them about it over the last 10 years
They have become a woke joke and are only concerned about racial equity issues according to their website. They have been silenced by the Marxist Mafia who are always trying to sell themselves as green
Is this how the Great Reset or Green New Deal “owner” class will manage their natural resources?
I can’t speak to this specific situation, however, on the Olympic Peninsula (Washington), they clear 20 or 40 acre blocks of land. Then they place a sing on it. Last logged in X year, will be logged again in Y year. Wild life can go to adjacent blocks. Looks sustainable, eco-friendly and maintains a small but healthy logging industry.
Here is the result of clear cutting in Oregon http://www.clearcutoregon.com/
5 years into a 20+ mega drought.
Which is worse fire taxing are dwindling water supply or a house bomb?
yeah better land management
the land has not been managed since the 80s
and who has run the state since then
oh sorry dems yeah arnold was here for a second but was blocked by pelosi and her gang of carpet baggers the whole time
so since him what have the dems done
….give you a clue we are in it right now
the newscum is the end game for dems ….pushing socialism and racism
the best part for us of this state is the dems blew their load having to steal the landslide for trump ….
they can not save gavin now the cat is out of the crate
if gavin wins the recount audit will come and they know it
so they are buying off any dem voter they can with free free free
money to any one who will take it
the newscum has now flooded the bias news with stories of how he will fix things all of them over 4-8 years if he is not shoved to the curb
so desperate and artificial
vote for change and actual management to better the state not turn it into a garbage state full of illegals and anti american government control
we the people all of us …..all of us should have the same american chance to better ourselves as best we can
not be held down by democrats pushing racism and teaching our kids that they cant do anything if they are the wrong color or womens rights being taken away because they are not looked at as a cog for the dem machine
the pelosi and her pol
Recall Newscum!
California does such a terrible job of managing its forests, that it continues to acquire more land. Think about that for a moment.
Controlled burns, thinning, firebreaks, etc…are all old tech. No need for Lawrence Livermore to study this thing. When I trained with CDF (now Cal Fire) back in the 70’s they were gung-ho to do all of that. “Environmental” groups objected, and others wanted the money spent on something else.
If that wasn’t enough, people were and are allowed to build where homes face extreme fire hazards, just as they were (are?) allowed to build in the flood plain back in the day.
Don’t forget that 57% of forests in California is actually US Forest
https://www.forestunlimited.org/resources/california-forest-statistics/
oh red we know who is burning the forests
creating panic and chaos
why do you think pge is claiming every fire as theirs
hmmm you would think they would not be so forward if not protected
by the gov letting pge and rape us over and over like the water company
why the people are allowing the gov to work us like idiots is beyond me
they mus be compliant all ready
sad so sad dems are pro china and burning us up just like aliens would do to us ……if they were hostile