TEXT NEWSTIPS/PHOTOS - 925-800-NEWS (6397)
Advertisement
Home » Water Officials Have Eyes On The Future

Water Officials Have Eyes On The Future

by CLAYCORD.com
32 comments

By Tony Hicks – East Bay Municipal Utility District officials have seen droughts come and go. But they seem to be coming more frequently this century.

Climate change is stoking devastating wildfire seasons year after year, drying the state out and just making it more flammable the following year. State water officials say that means less water in the Mokelumne River Watershed, the main source for EBMUD and its 1.4 million customers.

Last winter was the state’s driest since 1977, prompting the district to officially declare a stage one drought on April 27 and ask customers to cut ten percent of their water use. What can the East Bay expect moving forward?

Advertisement

EBMUD’s director of water and natural resources, Mike Tognolini, appeared earlier this month during on online chat hosted by Local News Matters. He said the district plans at least a year ahead, in case droughts continue. And climate change is now a constant factor, “whether we are considering infrastructure, water supply, or anything else.”

“We approach this issue from two angles,” Tognolini said. “First, how will the changing climate impact our ability to serve our customers? We consider things like changing weather conditions, extreme events, increased temperatures leading to increased water use, changes to habitat on our watershed, wildfire risk, etc.”

“Second, we evaluate climate change of what can we do as a utility to reduce the impacts of climate change,” he said. “For EBMUD this means finding ways to reduce our energy consumption and use green alternatives when we must use power. Our EBMUD Board has established the most aggressive greenhouse gas reduction goal for a water utility that we know of in the nation – to have net zero carbon emission for our water utility by 2030.”

Water experts are frequently asked why California doesn’t build more reservoirs to catch all that fresh water headed out to the Pacific during good years.

Advertisement

“The age of building new on-stream dams is generally behind us,” Tognolini said. “On-stream reservoirs can cause harm to habitat for many species and specifically migrating fish like salmon. That is not to say there will not be any new dams. The focus is on enlarging existing dams, where practical, or building off-stream dams that don’t block major rivers or utilizing underground storage.”

Storage facility expansion is already underway in a couple Bay Area locations.

“Under Proposition 1, the state is providing significant funding to promote a number of new storage facilities,” Tognolini said. “There are two proposed in the Bay Area: Los Vaqueros Reservoir in Contra Costa County and Pacheco Reservoir in Santa Clara County.”

“EBMUD has prepared a draft Urban Water Management Plan this year that considers what our water supply portfolio may look like in 30 years,” Tognolini said. “We try to create a diverse set of supply sources to be more resilient to future drought.”

Advertisement

California water districts must think outside the box. Wastewater recycling for non-drinking purposes has been in play at EBMUD for decades. “We can recycle 9 million gallons per day for industrial and irrigation use, and our plan is to double that to 20 million gallons per day by 2040,” Tognolini said.

How about desalinating some of that endless sea water off our coast?

“Desalination is an option that is considered by many water utilities and the largest seawater desalination project in the state is in Southern California,” Tognolini said. “There are also local projects that desalinate salty groundwater or wastewater for use. EBMUD does not currently desalinate water, and while it is on the list of possible long term future projects, it does have some drawbacks compared to other alternatives like high energy use – potential high cost and carbon emissions- and brine disposal.”

Even while we send water hundreds of miles south to Los Angeles, our neighbors to the north rarely have water supply issues. Why not get some from them?

Advertisement

“This idea and similar ideas have been evaluated and considered in the past,” Tognolini said. “The infrastructure and energy costs would be massive. So far, nothing has made sense financially. Also, we would have to have an agreement from other states to sell us their water – probably not an easy issue to resolve.”

The good news is that Californians are used to droughts and reservoirs were mostly full before the last rainy season began.

“EBMUD customers did an outstanding job responding to water conservation messages during the last drought,” said Andrew Lee, the district’s head of customer service. “EBMUD customers used 24 percent less water in 2015 as compared to 2013, at the beginning of the last drought. Since then, EBMUD customers continued conserving water and are using 13 percent less water in 2020 compared to 2013.”

32 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Tony Hicks is an idiot for thinking he can sell climate change as the primary cause behind our recent fires. There is no proof of that whatsoever. Forestry mismanagement is the main reason. It’s easier to blame nature than to take responsibility for decades of stupidity and inaction, right?

They can sell their green agenda someplace else.

I will cut my water usage only when I see the state cutting back. The state can demonstrate the seriousness of a water shortage by being a roll model. They can start by placing a moratorium on new housing development, and deporting every person living in California illegally.

I approve of your idea. After that we need to seriously look at water desalination plants, and perhaps more reservoirs. Water conservation is not going top solve this by itself.

Hopefully they’ll increase our rates and set up a 1-800 snitch line to tell on our neighbors if they wash their cars or water their lawns.

Best post of the the day😆😅👍🏻

I will call them and tell them when I water my lawn or wash my car. It is their purpose in life to furnish us with water. I don’t need any excuses.

Little something from CA water commission, if it’s the right project.
Shows timeline, shows projected completion date of 2029.
Also gives a glimpse into why anything CA government touches takes so long.
https://tinyurl.com/2ce9mbwe

Spent $120 million to increase dam 34 feet back in 2012.
After this latest raising project are they gonna come back in another decade when construction costs are even higher and want to raise it again ?

If there is water to grow pot, there is water for my lawns…

It used to be water was wet. Now, water is woke.

I’m waiting for them to say the water is now racist too.

climate change is a lie

al gore’s teacher reversed his position and then al said he was senile

I know of a nursery near Santa Cruz that was going to take a year off from production and go on sabbatical. They asked the state if they would still be allocated the same amount of water for the following year as they were allocated for the year that they would be closed. The state said they had to use the same amount of water while closef in order to keep their allotment. So they had to run water all summer long into a vacant field Just to keep their allocated water. When the state gets serious about water usage so will I.

32 million gallons of usable recycled water dumped into the river EVERY day and no current plan to recover it. Two agencies that need to fix the paperwork that keeps the Agencies from working as one to use this resource.

Take a look at what is going on with Arizona and the Colorado River. Water will soon became another commodity, and priced mas such.
You think food prices will increase because of costly water? Durr.
I can hear Sam Kinison right now, “YOU LIVE IN A DESERT!!”

I miss Sam and that era of common sense, critical thinking, and reality.
The dumbed-down masses can be sold anything now by media, government, and big corporations.
We’ve become ants in the after-birth.

The whole Pacific Ocean is right THERE!
Desalinization plants, for pity’s sake!!!

The idea of large-scale desalinization is untenable without nuclear power. Unless you’re okay with burning natural gas and coal to get there, which no one is in California.

I love the desalination naysayers. To have a plant to get 100 million gallons a day would be the same fuel as a 747 uses at cruise. 100 million gallons a day would not have to run that often to supplement what we need.

I’ll bet that “water officials” have their eyes on customer’s wallets. They never met a rate-increase they didn’t like.

drive by the concord main post office when it is watering the road, then tell us about how the state manages anything well

Sorry to state the obvious. but stop all the illegals from coming into our state let alone the US and then maybe things will right themselves and medical costs, welfare subsidies and entiltlement costs, housing costs, burning of cities, etc., will be largely reduced.

Stop the free give aways on the backs of the citizens who are overtaxed to cover all this free money…..people are realizing this more and more now that it is hitting their pocketbooks. How about government officials giving up their salaries and opening their homes to all these “extras”?

2.7 million illegal aliens live in California. They use a lot of water too. If they weren’t here, do you suppose there would be more water for us citizens?

About 10% of CA water is used residential. Of course if all these illegal aliens wouldn’t irrigate their huge landscape in their McMansions, or fill their gigantic swimming pools, or constantly wash their brand new luxury cars, there would no water shortage at all.

Isn’t it great to always have a scapegoat for any problem? It is so much easier than really address a problem.

“Isn’t it great to always have a scapegoat for any problem? It is so much easier than really address a problem.”

Maybe you should stay the course and blame it all on Trump.

Why don’t we take some of that 27 billion dollars Newsum is wasting on buying votes to avoid being recalled to enlarge and build new reservoirs? Those dollars could build a pipeline from the gulf states where they get to much rain and flood every year . California is doomed unless we change our leadership .

“our neighbors to the north rarely have water supply issues. Why not get some from them?”

Whoever wrote that is not paying attention. They are having extreme drought conditions now with the Klamath River basin’s allocation cut to zero this year. Lake Tahoe’s level is below the rim that normally drains into the Truckee river. That also means zero water for that river.

EBMUD has the option of getting water from the Contra Costa Water district. The connection between the two districts is already in place. The original intent of that connection was to allow the districts to feed water to each other in the event of a region wide disaster such as an earthquake. There are some complications as EBMUD uses water from the Mokelumne river with their intake being up in the Sierra foothills. Minimal treatment is needed to make it drinking water. CC Water’s intake is from the Sacramento river in the delta. As the delta gets brackish, CC Water has a fairly extensive treatment plant. Thus, while the emergency interconnect can be opened I believe customers on one or possibly both sides would need to boil their water for drinking.

CC Water is not as impacted by the current drought as they are already set up to deal with brackish water. During the height of the snow melt the water is flowing fast enough that the tides can’t push salt water up the river into delta. CC Water pumps the clean snow melt water from the Sacramento river into the Los Vaqueros Reservoir. As the snow melt slows down and stops the tides push salt water into the delta which turns brackish. CC Water can both treat moderately brackish water and can blend in fresh water from the Los Vaqueros Reservoir. Los Vaqueros has enough capacity to handle several years of low to minimal snow melt.

There is a project in the works to expand the Los Vaqueros Reservoir. Related to this is either increasing CC Water’s treatment capacity and/or adding it on the EBMUD side. That will allow the interconnect between the districts to be used while also providing fully treated water to customers.

The Diablo and Martinez water districts are also connected to CC Water’s system.

We also have an untreated water district in the area. Its water can be used for golf courses, parks, and some industries. I wish that system could be expanded to most of the county or even the bay area. It would take some pressure off from CC Water and EBMUD where treated drinking water is being used as irrigation water.

yes mismanaged funds that we pay for are going to politicians bank accounts

the state of the state is a democrat politicians fault

they use us a cash cow thats it

we pay taxes ontop of taxes so they can pilfer

you pass bills for more taxes and yet here we are

the government of this state not maintaining anything but taxing us up the rear claiming to fix but giving it the unions as laundered pay outs for campaign funding

over 50 years of dem ruling regime and where are we
no water bad roads bad schools bums and criminals being given our money …infrastructure failing and the newscum releasing arsonists to burn us down
the movie the stand comes to mind

yet we are paying over 25% across the board in taxes plus fees and soda tax and increased property taxes and what do we get

bums and crime and uneducated kids …well educated to entitlement and socialism but who wants that really

bowing down for 50 years has gotten us this

seems everyone is happy so carry on

make your checks payable to the newscum and aunt pelosi

daily or suffer more tax hikes and fires

90% of the water in California is used for things other than urban use. So if you cut off everyone’s water completely you will save only 10% of the water.
We can stop watering the lawn, flushing the toilet taking shorter showers but that will have minimal effect on the state water use.

Graphic of where our water goes
https://bit.ly/341iY0y

Very informative chart! Thanks.

Another chart showing where all of California’s water goes.

https://norcalwater.org/wp-content/uploads/Ca-water-use-final.pdf

I think that the water district uses the fear of ‘drought’ as a tool to increase rates and hand out fines…. But when the rains do come back… Does anybody’s rates go back down? I’ve never seen it happen. And the site to report abuses obviously doesn’t pertain to the cities. I have send numerous reports of them city of Concord’s sprinklers being broken and just dumping a waterfall straight down the storm drains in the downtown area. I’m watching it happen on the corner infront of honeybaked ham right now as I write this. But the easiest problem to fix is also the easiest to ignore. They don’t fine themselves after all now do they?

Advertisement

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Latest News

© Copyright 2023 Claycord News & Talk