California Officials Praise Ruling Barring Citizenship Question On 2020 Census

January 20, 2019 10:00 am · 79 comments

California officials this week hailed a ruling by a federal judge in New York blocking a plan by the administration of President Donald Trump to include a citizenship question on the 2020 census.

“This is a victory for all Americans,” said San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera, who represented San Francisco in the New York case.

“The Trump administration was playing politics with people’s lives in a deliberate attempt to undercount the population and tip power in his favor,” Herrera said in a statement.

Secretary of State Alex Padilla said, “Today’s ruling is a victory for democracy. An undercount in the 2020 Census could cost California billions of dollars of federal funding, jeopardize our representation in Congress and our fundamental voting rights.”

The question proposed by Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, whose department supervises the Census Bureau, would ask people whether they or members or their household are citizens.

Opponents contend the question would deter non-citizen immigrants from participating in the census. They say the resulting undercount will lead to reduced federal funding and congressional representation, which are based
on the once-a-decade census.

U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman of New York ruled that Ross’s decision to include the question violated the federal Administrative Procedure Act because Ross did not give a rational explanation and “ignored, cherry-picked, or badly misconstrued the evidence” before him.

He said Ross’s announcement in March 2018 that he was including the question at the request of the Justice Department to obtain information to enforce the Voting Rights Act was “pretextual” because evidence showed
that Ross made the decision months before conferring with the Justice Department and that there are better ways to obtain citizenship information.

Furman also said in a 277-page ruling Ross violated a law requiring him to tell Congress three years in advance before adding new topics to the census.

He issued an injunction prohibiting the use of the question.

The judge ruled in two lawsuits. One, led by the state of New York, was filed by 18 states, Washington, D.C., and 15 cities and counties, including San Francisco and Monterey County. The second suit was filed by several nonprofit groups.

Justice Department spokeswoman Kelly Laco said, “We are disappointed and are still reviewing the ruling. Our government is legally entitled to include a citizenship question on the census and people in the United States have a legal obligation to answer.”

The New York cases are among several lawsuits filed in federal courts around the country to challenge the citizenship question.

Two other lawsuits are currently in trial before U.S. District Judge Richard Seeborg in San Francisco. Those cases were filed by the state of California, later joined by Oakland, Fremont and four other cities and counties, and by San Jose and the Black Alliance for Just Immigration.

Six days of testimony in that trial ended on Monday and Seeborg will hear closing arguments on Feb. 15.

Another lawsuit filed by individual residents of Maryland, Arizona and California is due to go to trial before a federal judge in Baltimore on Jan. 22.

QUESTION: Do you think the citizenship question should be on the 2020 census?

Ricardoh January 20, 2019 at 10:51 AM

Our telephones know who we talk to, what we read and where we go. Our computers know more. No one seems to mind. Social media knows what we think and no one seems to mind. However we better not find out if you are a citizen or not.

PO'd January 20, 2019 at 10:55 AM

Yes. I think most Americans would be shocked if they knew the real number of illegals here. I am also sure that Democrats would fight this to the end.

Anon January 20, 2019 at 10:57 AM

Wow. Hopefully, many of the volunteers will NOT volunteer for this Crime.

Xennial January 20, 2019 at 11:01 AM

No it should not. For all the reasons the judge sided to remove the citizenship question. It is very important that the census accurately counts the number of PEOPLE. Accuracy of the census ties directly to the Constitutional right to vote. If you start subverting the accuracy of the census then you are subverting the Constitutional right to vote – and that would be wrong.

Badge1104 January 20, 2019 at 12:39 PM

That’s just it. Non citizen are not allowed to vote!though the Democrats would love them to be able to vote thinking they would keep them in power. I’d be more worried if the illegals would vote that California secede the nation and be returned back to Mexico.

Really... January 20, 2019 at 1:14 PM

U.S. Citizens vote, illegal/undocumented people DO NOT. By counting them, it still does not give them the right to vote.

Please explain why they should be counted disguised as citizens and how illegal/undocumented people are protected to vote by the Constitution.

Sick of it January 20, 2019 at 4:29 PM

Really
They should not be counted at all. They are not a citizen of this country. They are here illegally living with n someone else social security number they stole. Go try and do that in Mexico and see where you end up

Ven Xeter January 20, 2019 at 8:03 PM

@Really… “U.S. Citizens vote, illegal/undocumented people DO NOT” This is a ridiculous statement, ESPECIALLY in California. A former employer of mine hired illegals and more than once on election day I saw them carrying their SEIU “who to vote for” cards. Illegal voting doesn’t only happen in California, it’s actively encouraged.

Jim R January 21, 2019 at 11:50 AM

Sick of it, the founders didn’t say count citizens, they said “persons”. In our Constitution, citizen and person are two different things.

Van Exeter, please tell me you can tell the difference between carrying a campaign card and casting a vote.

Liar! Liar! January 21, 2019 at 11:59 AM

There is no proposal to only count citizens. People who are not citizens, and even illegal aliens would still be counted. The people who don’t want the citizenship question on the census don’t want the country to know how many illegals are here.

Rollo Tomasi January 21, 2019 at 4:16 PM

@Xennial: Noodle out the difference between “sided” and “cited “, and I’ll give the rest of your comment the derision it deserves.

Xennial January 22, 2019 at 1:55 PM

Yes, typo *cited.

Those who scream illegal/undocumented seem ignorant of the practical impact this question would have on citizens. Particularly in households with both citizens and non-citizens living there. For example, if a non-citizen grandparent lives with their family who are citizens. Or shared apartment rentals where some renters are citizens and others might not be (or are mistakenly perceived as such).
To spell it out, (1) it is reasonable for non-citizen legal residents to refuse to answer such a question because even if they are here legally (i.e. a proper work visa, etc.) the efforts of ICE to attempt to deport has notable instances of attempting to deport the wrong people (even US citizens.). While the census question is not intended to be an instrument of ICE it is a reasonable fear. (2) Citizens living with non-citizen legal residents may be affected because they might not be counted when the household does not respond. (3) Thus, there is a significant threat of undercounting citizens themselves, particularly among minority populations.
(4) Therefore, the census question would be undermining at least to some extent the constitutional right to vote of these citizens and everybody living within the same state if/when there is a reduction in congressional representation based on population undercounts.

While this impact is likely small – it is still undermining a fundamental Constitutional right. It is easy enough to ask these questions separately apart from the census. So just ask the question separately.

Jim R January 20, 2019 at 11:05 AM

The Constitution requires a count of ‘persons’, not citizens. The question should not be a part of the census, just as any question that serves to reduce participation should not be included.

PO'd January 20, 2019 at 12:41 PM

Yes, the Constitution requires a count of residents, not citizens. It also doesn’t delineate methodology used for the census. It was originally used for enumeration of Congressional districts only, but has been expanded to include more data:.age, sex, race, Hispanic origin, relationship, and tenure. This helps bringing more money to certain districts at the expense of the American/California taxpayers. Gov Newsom indicated in the past that SF was under-counted and therefor, underfunded. Lotsa illegals there-I’m sure he was referring to them. You must have those Fed dollars to offset the services offered to illegals. Dangerous statement from a progressive leader because the left does not want citizens to know how many are here illegally. (It will be eventually termed racist in newspeak to ask).
Welcome to the CollectivePeople’sProgressiveParty State of California. I’m sure the new Governor will be celebrated.

Me January 20, 2019 at 2:23 PM

Having the question would not change a count of ‘persons,’ it would allow for better. Categorization of those persons.

Dr. Jellyfinger January 20, 2019 at 11:21 AM

If they remove that question I am not going to cooperate with the census at all.

Whats the point of conducting the census with all those other stupid questions if they are going to leave such an important question out?

Don’t ask the question?
Sounds like hide your head in the sand liberal logic.

S January 20, 2019 at 11:28 AM

they praise it because they are afraid to publicly admit how many illegal (yes, I said it!) people get benefit from our tax dollar; then they wonder why so many “working citizens” are fleeing this State in record numbers….

Ricardoh January 20, 2019 at 11:32 AM

Questions of citizenship have been in many previous census surveys.

concord grape January 20, 2019 at 11:33 AM

Am I reading wrong? The more illegals in California will mean more federal funding? Hell with the wall, let them all in. We can’t take care of our own citizens but can surely give the illegals a free ride.

Well??!!! January 20, 2019 at 11:49 AM

An attempt to tip power in Trump’s favor??!! What a joke! This is an attempt to tip power in the Dems favor! Holy crap, the hypocrisy is mind blowing….ballot harvesting and jungle primaries apparently isn’t enough.

Chris January 21, 2019 at 10:18 AM

A nonpartisan blanket primary (Jungle Primary) is a primary election in which all candidates for the same elected office, regardless of respective political party, run against each other at once…

If any GOP candidates were deemed to be viable contenders by all the population, they wouldn’t be so afraid of an open vote.

Want an example of unfair power distribution hypocrisy?
Deep Red states like Montana, North and South Dakota, and Wyoming have a collective population of barely 5 million people, yet control 8 Senators, That’s a population no larger than that of the bay area, a decidedly Blue region.

That’s an inconceivably distorted power tilt in GOP favor, and hardly the only example.
That population means there are roughly 750,000 Californians to each electoral college vote, where as there are barely 180,000 Wyoming residents

Imagine now if Senators were elected to Washington in the same fashion? Based entirely on popular vote in full state-wide open primary…where the Urban and Rural votes went head to head and candidates had to be broadly appealing to both sides of the political spectrum.

We (the Ditzy Dems) already trend towards weeding out the ultra-left liberals and overly colorful characters, who mean well but aren’t ready for prime time, and instead put many socially forward, educated thinking, moderates up for the vote.

I would be happy to listen to a GOP candidate who presented thought out discussions for securing the safety of the united states, specifically one that didn’t involve oppressing the rest of the world to accomplish that.

One who may have a plan for promoting the education and training of students, in an environment that isn’t life threating. Revamping all education facilities across the country (especially in areas where manufacturing and agriculture will no longer be viable career options) to turn out productive Americans who have hope and aspirations for the future.

I will take seriously any candidate who can see that there is a better use for some of the billions of dollars that go to the military, uses like Full Medical coverage and programs for getting people and families back on their feet and productive again..

RED BLUE or PURPLE I don’t care I voted for Regan and I voted for Obama, based on their words and actions, not party lines.

Concerned Parent January 20, 2019 at 12:03 PM

It is mandated by Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution and takes place every 10 years. The data collected by the decennial census determine the number of seats each state has in the U.S. House of Representatives and is also used to distribute billions in federal funds to local communities. Why wouldnt we want to know how many people are legal and can legally vote so the the numbers will be accurate?

Chicken Little January 20, 2019 at 12:42 PM

Because then we’d get less federal funding and have fewer seats in the House Of Representatives. Democrats want to make sure they have every unfair advantage possible. Duh.

RANDOM TASK January 20, 2019 at 12:22 PM

hey dems this is what you do
“The Trump administration was playing politics with people’s lives in a deliberate attempt to undercount the population and tip power in his favor,”

by allowing illegals to increase dem votes Is the exact definition of politics
or are dems saying that tax payers paying for illegals is not political as our schools roads programs and taxes are directly affected by open illegal sanctuary policies all designed to increase dem votes

wow dems actually just say what ever and voters believe it
sad to see a country fall for a political scheme not seen since germany 1935….apparently dems like what happened in that political scheme …total control over ignorant voters that allowed a party to take complete control of the country
oh and yeah they blamed the other party as well …..wow sad for this country
at least the illegals and their 4 kids get free healthcare money and housing until it all collapses

Giddyup January 20, 2019 at 4:25 PM

They also get free education for their children at taxpayer expense. Check your property tax bill and the amount you are paying for the local school district … and for the community college system. I actually got to pay twice. My college education wasn’t free. I had to pay for it. Now, I get to pay for theirs, too. You have to be rich to be so generous and Nancy Pelosi can afford it like most people can’t. Democrats are completely out of touch with the average, ordinary hard-working California citizen. It looks like Nancy got too much Botox and Chuck didn’t get enough.

https://shawglobalnews.files.wordpress.com/2019/01/chuck-nancy.jpg?quality=70&strip=all&w=720&h=453&crop=1

RANDOM TASK January 20, 2019 at 12:33 PM

people it is obvious of the numbers of illegals in this state alone …it is already being run by them
why do you think politicians are so strongly defending policy to house them and stealing school money to fund illegals
why do you think laws are being passed to allow crime and not prosecute criminals
why do you think laws are passed to allow illegals to abuse our systems and programs

why do you think the dem politicians are taking away citizens freedoms

why do you think empty store fronts and abandoned areas are being created

why do you think the politicians are encouraging and down right creating bad roads and building more and more high density low rent housing

the illegals are creating their ideal environment and forcing American citizens who strive for more to move out of state …..

20 more years and the truth will be on you …illegals have already taken the state over you just haven’t realized it yet

the number of illegals here is directly running the state just watch how dem politicians operate and the laws they are passing

add them up and you get what …..seriously it is very obvious who is running this state and it is not americans

Reality says... January 20, 2019 at 12:57 PM

No, the purpose of the census is to count belly buttons, not inquire about citizenship.

Even if you added it, people would just lie so I don’t see the value.I think the census results are probably way off as well.

RSD January 20, 2019 at 1:29 PM

Completely Agree, Barney. It’s simple and logical. The fools that support this are just plain naive..

George January 20, 2019 at 1:41 PM

“This is a victory for all Americans” San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera is making a false statement.

No worries … the feds have other ways of identifying the illegals who are signed up and listed on the 2020 Census.

Nunya January 20, 2019 at 2:05 PM

“tip it in his favor”? how? by stopping those who aren’t citizens from being to do what only citizens should, like vote?? this guy is part of the problem.

mtzman January 20, 2019 at 2:09 PM

Funny how so many of you who demand absolute adherence to the “clear” language of such things as the Second Amendment suddenly want to ignore the even more clear constitutional requirement of a census that counts all people.

But what is even funnier is the assumption that counting everyone, or restrictions on legal voting, will somehow favor Democrats. Perhaps if you all spent a little more time asking yourself why Cuban Hispanics vote more Republican than other Hispanic groups, or how the Republican party could attract more conservative Hispanics instead of fixating on a stupid wall, we’d all be a lot better off.

Eastbay Babe January 21, 2019 at 2:51 PM

As an American Mexican I support the wall. Gosh I wonder why Cubans support the Republican Party. Perhaps due to the fact they have lived under Communism. They recognize the Democrat plank similar to communism. Now for the rest of other illegals many will vote similar to how they voted in their native country. In turn, changing the state or nation exactly into the mess they flee from.

Me January 20, 2019 at 2:19 PM

Need to add Visa holder, as the aren’t citizens, but are legally in the country.

Coco Rez January 20, 2019 at 2:25 PM

Boycott census!

Tsa January 20, 2019 at 2:38 PM

California officials are morons so what they think is irrelevant. It’s much easier to make up BS and give taxpayer money away to illegals.

Dr. Jellyfinger January 20, 2019 at 2:51 PM

Well…. if they are going to ask about your race, ethnicity, marital status, sexual orientation, income, education, etc. why the hell should we not ask if you are actually a CITIZEN of the USA?

I’m sure if the purpose of the census was not to hide information….

So it seems kind of pointless to avoid THAT particular question!

jon s January 20, 2019 at 3:04 PM

This is one of the worst things a state could do to its own people

Randy January 20, 2019 at 3:09 PM

Are you a citizen?
Yes.
ok Thank you

If you ask the question you have to require proof or it’s meaningless.

Dorothy January 20, 2019 at 3:16 PM

Aside from just counting noses, the feds use the count to decide how much of the money the states send to the feds that the feds will give back based on how many people are in that state. So any state can’t count all the people won’t get as much of that money back. (Not just California.)

I tried not to answer the question about sex and got a census call (many years ago) saying I had to respond to what sex I was and I kept saying I didn’t want to. The person calling said they would put me down as female and hung up.

GreenAcres January 20, 2019 at 3:35 PM

Pathetic. “A victory for Americans”. Since when is it shameful or disrespectful to announce your citizenship! Why is it that the liberal judges want to protect illegals — I mean, “undocumented people”? This is what it country has come to. I am sick and tired of people pulling the race card or say ing that all humans deserve to be here. If they want to be part of the country that badly, go through the proper channels and wait period like every one else trying to come here the legal way. I hope this judge is booted in the next election.

Jim R January 21, 2019 at 12:23 PM

Movement between countries is a human right. Border protection is the right of a nation. America prides itself as being a country of laws, a country where perhaps the single greatest governing document in human history is the supreme law. Due process is foundational. Our immigration system, one that overlooks visa overstays and seperates families lacks due process.

Bad Nombre January 20, 2019 at 3:42 PM

As an amateur genealogist, I appreciate the old censuses that asked questions like “where were you born?”, “Where were your parents born and what was their mother tongue?”, “When did you come to this country if not native born?”, “Where did you live five years ago?”, etc.

Forsythe January 20, 2019 at 3:49 PM

California’s financial situation is very shaky. It has to chase cash cows. California has allocated $100.3 million for “census outreach” in 2019.

There’s also the question of power. Up to three of California’s 53 congressional seats are at stake.

Source: American Thinker.
“California spends $100 million to maximize Census cash jackpot”

Jim R January 21, 2019 at 12:29 PM

The CA financial system is not shaky. We live in what currently is the worlds 5th or 6th largest economy. We’re good citizens because we send some of our money to other states that are not as fortunate as we are. Heck yes I want as much federal money back as possible, we already pay for it.

Fred P. January 21, 2019 at 3:16 PM

Jim R forgets about the unfunded liabilities and boondoggles such as the bullet train to nowhere.

Sure, california taxes the hell out of residents so it can “send some if it to other states…”

So that it “can” send some to other states?

Keep talking about the economy as you continue to be taxed to death.

JazzMan January 20, 2019 at 4:04 PM

Nope! No reason to. As explained by the judge, it will cause an undercount when people will be afraid to answer questions. Trump’s attempt to cut representation from states who don’t don’t support his racist agenda.

RANDOM TASK January 20, 2019 at 4:13 PM

Mtzman well you …..ugh wait
Sorry your representing mtz sorry your all ready on the coolaide
So this will not apply to you just promote your rhetorIc of our tax dollars for the world to use policy

Seriously though so your saying the census is just and right even though the dems manipulate it and abuse it

Then what is this about Cubans last I saw they work their ass off
When was the last time you saw a Cuban Infront oh Home Depot In this state

The dems and apparently mtzman and dem voters are ok with counting illegals and bums to illegally obtain more fed money and representatives

How do you think we got de slacker from behind the bar to licking 4 inch heels of Pelosi and kamala so not respectable

The fed money should go to citizens of this America or why Dont you just work for free and your income can go to a world general fund and you can live in a 100 sf box along with everyone else

Why do dems and dem voters want illegals and have them take all of our tax money and fed money …..answer that question mtzman and we shall see just how unjust real Americans are

Eastbay Babe January 21, 2019 at 2:57 PM

BRAVO!!!!!

Giddyup January 20, 2019 at 4:28 PM

Actually, if I remember correctly, asking one’s citizenship could possibly be the least intrussive question on that census questionnaire.

Amy January 20, 2019 at 6:06 PM

Does anyone think illegals will actually tell the truth?

Fred P. January 21, 2019 at 3:21 PM

Illegals tell the truth?

You mean they’ll tell the truth after violating federal immigration laws?

Sounds like Kamala Harris saying she believed Kavanaugh’s accusers because they “sounded so believable.”

Btw, I haven’t heard any responses from any democrats taking umbrage at the latest Kavanaugh lying accusers.

RANDOM TASK January 20, 2019 at 6:32 PM

So dems made everyone else come out of the closet
Why not illegals
This is a sanctuary state
They reap the benefits of declaring illegal anyways
Besides dems need them to declare anyways …so they know just how much further they need to go to divide the state and encompass majority delegates…endemnifying dem voters to voting dem for life or lose benefits
Simple strategy of divide and conquer
And it’s working as planned and better than projected
See dems take all the money and let the state go to crap
When tragedy happens they declare emergency and get fed money for a fix

Genius really that by defunding the schools no one is the wiser and the take over seems like dem voters decision ahhhhh classic infiltration technique

Itsme January 20, 2019 at 6:42 PM

The census is a count of persons not citizens or residents. It is supposed to be as accurate as possible.

Imagine someone working here legally on a visa. Maybe they drive on a freeway which is built and maintained with Federal funds. Or use BART, built and maintained in part with Federal funds. Their visa has to be administered by Federal employees. This is one reason why the census counts PERSONS. We also need Representatives in DC to lobby for Federal funding for all the people in their districts.

PO'd January 20, 2019 at 8:08 PM

Residents. Constitution says so.

Jim R January 21, 2019 at 12:34 PM

po’d, you must be using an edited copy of the Constitution. I don’t see residents, I see persons.

PO'd January 21, 2019 at 4:46 PM

From Wikipedia:
Decennial U.S. Census figures are based on actual counts of persons dwelling in U.S. residential structures. They include citizens, non-citizen legal residents, non-citizen long-term visitors and undocumented immigrants. The Census Bureau bases its decision about whom to count on the concept of usual residence.

cee January 20, 2019 at 7:12 PM

Yes it should. anyone who took a civics or govt class knows the census is also used to assign congressional representaties.But this has to be accurate and count only citizens.

If not you have what we have here in california (and other places). Tens if not hundreds of thousands of non citizens voting and altering the direction the government goes.

Jim R January 21, 2019 at 12:40 PM

Sorry cee, I can’t find any facts to back up your claim of potentially 100’s of thousands of fraudulent votes in CA.

Dr. Jellyfinger January 20, 2019 at 7:23 PM
PO'd January 21, 2019 at 6:53 PM

Quite a long list. I’ll pass on the American Community Survey, but will
answer the Census questions.

Max. January 20, 2019 at 8:11 PM

I agree! # of total citizens determines # of representatives, but we will only know the total # of people, illegals, non citizens with visas, and citizens all grouped together.. It is a travesty to us citizens. We also need voter ID.

WC Resident January 20, 2019 at 8:21 PM

@cee – Congressional representation is based on the entire population, including children, felons, and aliens (legal or otherwise), all of which can’t vote for federal offices. It’s not a count of eligible voters.

The census data also is used for many things besides assigning congressional representatives.

Wildcat January 20, 2019 at 8:53 PM

Once again Citizens being screwed.

Newellian January 20, 2019 at 11:40 PM

I am so sick of our elected crooks in Sacramento putting illegal aliens ahead of citizens, both natural born citizens, and naturalized legal immigrant citizens.

To all January 21, 2019 at 3:52 AM

The real reason why the left doesn’t want this program to go on. Right from the article itself. The millions of illegal aliens in California represents the money and political aspects they care more about than the actual citizens of
Our country.

Secretary of State Alex Padilla said, “Today’s ruling is a victory for democracy. An undercount in the 2020 Census could cost California billions of dollars of federal funding, jeopardize our representation in Congress and our fundamental voting rights.”

Justsaying ... January 21, 2019 at 9:39 AM

“ Decisions Made from Census Information:
While the information gathered from the Census plays an important role in determining how many seats each state will have in the House of Representatives, it also determines community funding. With more than $400 billion available for funding each year, you may be wondering, who is benefiting from this money and what programs are helped with this funding? The following is a list of how money may be dispersed within a community.

Provides services for the elderly
Helps build new roads
Helps build new schools
Contributes to neighborhood improvements
Assists in public health efforts“-https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-the-census-definition-purpose.html

If people don’t participate because of fear of repercussions than , less money for you and for you community.
If you want to learn more about the topic there are many good sources out there

WC Resident January 21, 2019 at 9:49 AM

@Newellian – You are welcome to leave California, the home of the world’s fifth largest economy which is supported in a large way by the people you complain about.

@To all – Our politicians tend to be honest about what they want and why. California has a larger percentage of non-citizens than most states and so it makes sense that officials want to make sure that as many people, citizens or otherwise, are counted. It benefits those of us in California. If you are a troll, Russian or otherwise, then feel free to complain bitterly about this.

PO'd January 21, 2019 at 10:42 AM

The honesty apparently evaporated when big expensive projects are involved- Bay Bridge build went 4X more than the honest politicians said it would. The same thing is happening with Jerry’s train set, as
the costs skyrocketed from the start.
Newsom will kill the train project that all of the Democrats blindly voted for, a feather in his cap. Hopefully, the roads in California will improve, but not without further fuel surcharges.
And, of course, the rising toll/fee/surcharge trend a la Don Perata (“Don’t call it a tax,call it a fee”) is inherently dishonest.

Anon January 21, 2019 at 10:58 AM

Better yet, how about all of the Law breakers such as yourself LEAVE California.
Tired of you snow flakes leeching off of everyone.

Did I say that Outloud January 21, 2019 at 10:29 AM

Illegal Aliens are Vacas an Efectivo.

Silva January 21, 2019 at 1:20 PM

Como? No pienso que eso quiere decir lo que Ud. piensa que quire decir.🤔

Dr. Jellyfinger January 21, 2019 at 6:36 PM

Illegal Aliens are cows and cash?

KG January 22, 2019 at 8:04 AM

Y’know, even Google Translate will give you a better translation.

Randy January 21, 2019 at 1:56 PM

Trump supporters have been brainwashed. They can’t think clearly any longer.

Fred P. January 21, 2019 at 3:11 PM

Says randy, the DNC troll……

I suppose that’s better than the democrats….. who have NEVER learned to think clearly.

Look in th3 mirror and you’ll see the definition of a hypocrite.

Nutcreek Frontier January 21, 2019 at 3:34 PM

As a native Californian, we don’t deserve any more Congressional seats if we keep electing these chuckleheads who don’t want to enforce laws.

Jim R January 21, 2019 at 4:24 PM

Uhh…the executive branch enforces the law, the legislative branch passes them (or not)

robert Vezina January 21, 2019 at 4:22 PM

Don’t count em as they will be eventually “SHORT TERMERS BYE!!!!”

jon s January 21, 2019 at 7:02 PM

the most wreckless thing you could do to any society is to hide the truth of its own people from its own people.They are hiding it for a reason and acting as if its some type of bigger freedom for the people.Hilarious.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: