Concord Police Weekly Burglary Report – 22 Burglaries Between Jan.21 – Jan.27

January 30, 2016 16:00 pm · 5 comments


This is the Concord Police weekly burglary report. Please click on the image for a much larger view.

This week, Concord had 22 burglaries. The week before, Concord had 19, and before that, Concord had 23 burglaries.

The last number in some of the addresses has been deleted to respect the privacy of the victim(s).

According to the Concord Police, the report shown above only includes approved reports. Some burglary reports might not be written or completely approved, which is why they are not included in this post.

Noj January 30, 2016 at 4:34 PM

Wonder if the Concord PD has an investigator working on the pay for play scandal unfolding at City Hall. Probably not.

Soft On Crime January 30, 2016 at 5:38 PM

An the downside for a criminal who steals less than $950 of your property is what maybe 10 days in County Jail ?

Nokeem January 30, 2016 at 8:52 PM

These are the typical out of control numbers of residential robberies that, mind you, there is a handicap of MISSING reports, that Concord City Council has absolutely no time for. What, with all of their backroad dealing (thru should all be indicted, including that crook, former Mayor Grayson) they have no time or money to actually do something to benefit the taxpayers. Remember us? You cheating no good politicians! This report is a disgrace and only exacerbated by the FACT that you are missing robberies. And I know for a fact that a real report exists with all of the robberies – no delay – but that copy is for pay only. A fact.

Nokeem January 30, 2016 at 10:37 PM

And s big thank you to Noj for putting in the Link to contra Costa bee about the CNWS Concord City Council Scandal (scumbags). Why this did not merit an article, but all of the congressmen’s endless pandering to the masses is published. Why I’ll never know.

Jizzmonkey February 1, 2016 at 8:53 PM

Just get a gun and protect yourself and your family dead robbers tell no lies

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: