Concord Man Detained in Clayton Shopping Center After High-Risk Traffic Stop

November 22, 2012 14:47 pm · 32 comments

A Concord man, who was allegedly wanted on a felony warrant in Antioch, was possibly taken into custody in the Clayton Station Shopping Center on Thursday afternoon around 2pm during a traffic stop by Officers from Clayton & Concord Police. It has not been confirmed that the man detained was the wanted man, although we’re hearing he was driving the suspect’s vehicle, according to police.

The suspect’s name hasn’t been officially released.

Two other people were detained during today’s traffic stop.

Thanks to the anonymous Claycordian for the picture!

1 Nick Dailey November 22, 2012 at 3:08 PM

I write to let you know, in the heat of reading this article, that your information if horribly, shamefully flawed. This was not the the suspect described and you lose validity and credibility posted such insulting information. The fact is, that was a mistaken identity and the police were wrong. The so-called suspect is home, attempting to eat a thanksgiving meal. The person detained was attempting to video tape, by camera phone, the harassing behavior being displayed by the police. When told to leave, and refusing, the person was arrested. This just goes to show the ignorant behavior of prejudice witnesses. Drawing conclusions, that happen often, to be false.

2 the Shi ite November 22, 2012 at 3:18 PM

Hip Hip Hooray – 3rd times a charm, Except California voters voted the 3 strikes law down. Back to the streets Thuggin’ at 50 yrs old!!!

3 steve r November 22, 2012 at 3:44 PM

Nick ur wrong…. the woman arrested was calling out both suspects names when the police said ok leave u are interfering…. and she wouldnt listen he reapeted it and said u are going to get arrested she said something else and was detained… so dont make shit up….

4 anynomus November 22, 2012 at 3:59 PM

Nick ur wrong…. the woman arrested was calling out both suspects names when the police said ok leave u are interfering…. and she wouldnt listen he reapeted it and said u are going to get arrested she said something else and was detained… thats the truth….

5 Double D November 22, 2012 at 4:04 PM

Claycord will pay for this slandering.

6 JCM November 22, 2012 at 4:09 PM

How can you slander an unnamed person? Claycord hasn’t even said who the suspect was.

7 Nick Dailey November 22, 2012 at 4:09 PM

No Steve it is you who are wrong, yes she was told to stop filming and refused, as I said. You fail to see the point and the topic of the post, “A concord man, who was allegedly wanted on a felony warrant, was taken into custody,” is false. My point was the post and title are incorrect and not the truth. If you were being falsely arrested, and your wife was there witnessing it, would you feel the same way? I’m sorry if people who honestly, really are not involved or affected, feel insulted in any way by what I say, I too feel insulted. I feel insulted by the lack of support of the truth. I wish everyone a happy thanksgiving with their families. We have already spent too much time away from this holiday..

8 @ Double Douchebag November 22, 2012 at 4:09 PM

Slander? Who exactly is being slandered? A suspect whose name hasn’t been released? Haha, not exactly a lawyer, are you?

9 anynomus November 22, 2012 at 4:12 PM

Exactly ur obviously just as bad or dont know what the hell ur talking about

10 Steve R November 22, 2012 at 4:17 PM

No nick i was right there it was no wife….. she was telling the cops the namesof the accused and the cops said ok please leave cuz there were gins drawn… there was no video tape….. i dont know and u dont know what ur talking about……

11 Dem Babies November 22, 2012 at 4:27 PM

@Steve R # 10-The cops had heir “gins” drawn? Are you accusing the cops of drinking on the job. Mr . Mayor: there’s your REAL story!

12 Spanky November 22, 2012 at 4:37 PM

Slander somebody who is not named? How is that even possible?

13 Steve R November 22, 2012 at 5:46 PM

Sorry spell check….. it was guns dumb a–

14 Howard K Mullins III November 22, 2012 at 6:25 PM

Troll alert

Double D? Give me a break.

If you gonna use a fake name at least think of one that is not so fake.

I’ll bet your mother any children she could be proud of?

15 HA! November 22, 2012 at 6:29 PM

Duggan

16 NRA #1 fan and member November 22, 2012 at 6:40 PM

You’re both making up stories.. I witnessed the whole thing and both stories are BS

17 Dennis November 22, 2012 at 6:40 PM

yo Nicky
“A concord man, who was allegedly wanted on a felony warrant, was taken into custody,” is false. My point was the post and title are incorrect and not the truth. If you were being falsely arrested, and your wife was there witnessing it”

it isn’t false arrest until the judge says so. this person ‘taken into custody’ is technically ‘detained’, but apparently not yet arrested. he was driving a car known to belong to a felon? sounds like probable cause for a ‘felony stop’ (guns drawn) to me.

the felon was having thanksgiving dinner, you knew where, and you didn’t tell the police? sounds like you were withholding evidence, which is a rap all your own.

Bottom line, Nicky, is that you should butt out and stop interfering with the police.

How many strikes you got so far, Nicky?

18 anon November 22, 2012 at 6:43 PM

The cops were looking for a known felon. He has been on Claycord.com before. His brother is a loser also.

19 Dear Nick Dailey November 22, 2012 at 7:07 PM

Time to get back on your meds dude . There are a whole bunch of goofy electrons bouncing around your brain

20 Concord Gape November 22, 2012 at 7:45 PM

Sounds like all you posters are full of more that turkey. Also, ever heard of spell check?

21 iamerica November 22, 2012 at 8:22 PM

It really doesn’t matter who it was they were in the wrong place at the wrong time if they were so called innocent that’s called being a bystander. If your interfering or interacting with the police or suspects than you are only asking for them to detain you.
If it so happens they didn’t get the guy they were looking for so be it. Probably snagged another loser.

22 Retired COP November 22, 2012 at 8:50 PM

“The so-called suspect is home, attempting to eat a thanksgiving meal.”

Appears he did not deserve to do so. Also– when a “friend’ drives a felon’s car– be prepared for guns in your face…..

23 Todd November 22, 2012 at 8:51 PM

I liked his hat!

24 Jason L. November 22, 2012 at 9:09 PM

Wrong person for everyone to know and to the Concord and Clayton pd LEARN HOW TO DO YOUR JOB! we wish we could thank you for you excellent service but what has been shown is a bunch of high school geeks and wanta bes who got a badge and arrest inocent people because they cant catch one man hahaha congrats to the sneaky guy who cant be caught and hahaha to the ones who cant catch him -J.L.

25 CPOA Hater November 22, 2012 at 10:18 PM

Is this more racism from the CPD?

26 Thank you Jason L November 22, 2012 at 10:19 PM

For putting on display your amazing lack of writing skills.You are a typical spoiled little wanna be crook.

27 hey November 22, 2012 at 10:33 PM

Steve R you are idiot and need to god something better to do with your time

28 12ga November 23, 2012 at 8:25 AM

@Jason L. your seriously laughing because a criminal can’t be caught? are you retarded?

29 DoReMi November 23, 2012 at 9:15 AM

I am not sure if I should complain about the chain link fence, or more importantly; why doesn’t this shopping center Have a GATE?

30 I just love how these Human Cockroaches..... November 23, 2012 at 10:51 AM

come scurrying to one another’s defense. Too bad they couldn’t put as much energy into leading honest and productive lives.

31 Dems Lie November 24, 2012 at 3:48 AM

@DD#5 slander is spoken [remember the 's']

Therefore, libel = written

32 Shenanigans November 24, 2012 at 8:04 PM

You know what bugs me? The citizens who blame the police for everything they don’t like. Have you ever heard the term “to serve and protect”? They pulled over a known suspects car, that’s “serving” and they had their weapons drawn and also arrested a bystander for interfering, that falls under “protect”. If it was mistaken identity, no harm – no foul, I’m sure the person detained was released a few hours later. Please explain how that constitutes OUR police officers don’t know how to do their job?? Last time I checked the police are human beings, not magicians or for that matter God. Human beings are known to make mistakes.

To Concord and Clayton PD, I do not wish to be included in #24’s blanket statement. I DO thank you for your continued efforts in keeping our community as safe as possible. With all the “shit heads” you have to put up with, I think you are entitled to have an attitude from time to time. Any citizen who is detained for mistaken identity I’m sure is understanding even though it may have inconvenienced their time slightly. I can’t speak to that, I’m just merely taking a guess at how I might react.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: