QUESTION: Would you support a ban on pit-bulls in the City of Concord?

July 22, 2010 18:31 pm · 245 comments

In 2005, the City of Concord looked in to banning pit-bulls after an 11-year-old boy was mauled, but state law prohibits banning certain breeds from an entire city.

After today’s killing of a two-year-old child by three pit-bulls inside a Concord home, we’re wondering if it was proposed by the City of Concord, and if the state law was changed, would you support a ban on pit-bulls in Concord?

Would you support a ban on pit-bulls in the City of Concord

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

{ 245 comments }

1 Khaleesi July 22, 2010 at 6:35 PM

People are so ignorant. Pitbulls aren’t the problem. Moronic gangbangers training pitbulls to be vicious are the problem. Pitbulls can be great family dogs when they are treated like a family pet and not a weapon.

2 Panic July 22, 2010 at 6:39 PM

My mom says it depends on how they’re handled. If you handle the dog badly, of course the dog is going to behave badly. How about we ban bad owners? :D

3 anon July 22, 2010 at 6:42 PM

I own a pit bull who I love very much. I would never leave a child around him or my other dog, a saint bernard/mastiff, (who is the most gentle creature in the world), because animals are just that, animals. They’re dangerous. I’m very sad this happened but to ban all pit bulls is taking it too far. People need to be educated about dogs. When ever a child comes up to pet my dogs I tell them to be careful and instruct them to always be cautious around all dogs/animals.

4 anonamom July 22, 2010 at 6:42 PM

Absolutely, but I think you have to change State law first.

5 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 6:43 PM

ok
1. How many other cities in the US have done this ??
2. This will never happen here
3. Giving $180,000 away & laying off city workers is more important

6 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 6:46 PM

It’s not the dog’s fault that they are aggressive. It’s up to the owner to socialize the dog from a young age, because I know some pit bulls who are the most loving dogs

7 Sawyer July 22, 2010 at 6:50 PM

While I’m not a fan of bans, I have to wonder who would choose to own a pitbull? I heard a child had been killed by a dog in Concord today and I automatically thought “pitbull” and low and behold it didn’t turn out to be a retriever breed but was actually a pitbull. Am I psychic? And don’t give me that it’s the owners crap. If that is the case it would appear that most bad owners are attracted to pitbulls so why would you want to be associated with that scene even if true? I guess bull sharks also have bad owners which is why they are so much more likely to attack then other shark breeds (even has bull in the name). Darn mermen and mermaids who own these bull sharks are out of control.

It’s impossible to concieve that these dogs might actually be affected by the fact that they were genetically engineered to be more agressive then other breeds. Heaven forbid common sense ever be applied to this issue.

8 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 6:51 PM

Some dogs are harder to train than others.
Some dogs are naturally stronger than others.

Owning a Pitt bull requires more dedication than most other breeds. I’ve met some really nice pitts all of wich were trained by knowledgeable people who had trained dogs before.

Having freedom means having the freedom to make mistakes, I wouldn’t be so reactionary to restrict people’s freedom because of an incident like this.

obviously the dog owners should be held responsible for the dogs actions, but lets not make yet another move towards becoming a society where we impose bans and sanctions on everything to protect people from themselves and in the process allow people to shed even more responsibility for their actions.

Also I’d rather not hear any more talk about “DNA” and “Genes” from people who clearly don’t know what they are talking about.

9 Kenny F. July 22, 2010 at 6:52 PM

They should be legal but they should have their teeth removed. Just like you can own a gun but no armor piercing bullets. I think that’s some middle ground we can all agree on!

10 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 7:01 PM

Think of all the room the shelter would have, it would be like a ghost town.

11 anon July 22, 2010 at 7:03 PM

Banning a breed of dog will not fix the problem. Owners need to be held more accountable for their dog’s behavior. And if that means penalizing the owner with jail time and monetary damages then so be it. I am also tired of seeing people walk their dogs without a leash. Obey the laws people!!!

12 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 7:05 PM

Think of all the room the shelter would have, it would be like a ghost town. The people who think pit bulls are not dangerous are probably the same people who think they are OK to drive after a six pack. They live in there own little world with blinders on.

13 David1 July 22, 2010 at 7:06 PM

When it comes to pit bulls the vast majority of the dogs are trained to be hostile. I don’t know about this particular case yet and I don’t care to guess. I look at a lot of Vick’s dogs that have been rescued and many are now happy house pets.

Don’t blame the breed, take a very close look at the people training them.

Pets all have one common trait, pure unconditional love. People have to take that love away from them before they harm others.

Any of you people have pure unconditional love? I certainly don’t…I would want to question any person very closely who claims they do….

14 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 7:08 PM

As has been posted many times, the problem with Pitbulls is not the dog, it’s the OWNER! The owner, not the dog, has the responsibility to ensure the safety of children when near his dog(s), whether the dog is a Pitbull or a Chihuahua. Children, especially very young ones, are apt to do things (unknowingly) that frighten or anger pets and should always be supervised when in the presence of pets.
With that said, my condolences to the family for their tragic loss. Doesn’t matter in the end where blame is placed…nothing can bring back their treasured child or fill the empty place in their hearts.

15 Ban the pittbull July 22, 2010 at 7:08 PM

I have a neighbor who has a Pit bull…They have a 3 yr old in the house…the dog has bitten at me but only got my shirt , has growled at me twice and has growled at my son (13yr old) . I told the owner..her response was “yea I know..she acts kinda crazy sometimes..but she is a good dog”…It is a time bomb waiting to happen…sad

And for all you “Its the owner and the way its raised people”…No its the breed….why would you risk everything you own…Makes no sense to me.

16 David1 July 22, 2010 at 7:11 PM

#5, I keep demanding Allen’s resignation and I have started a recall which is an enormous and almost impossible task. The best way to be sure laid off workers don’t get so darn much money plus a huge going away lunch that cost the city dearly as well, is to vote the bastards out. VTBO.

And I will not tolerate an increase in city sales tax while the pompous city council has not done an audit of each city department and cut it to the bone….

17 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 7:14 PM

Then why not ban all breeds. Any dog can be dangerous! But to ban one type of dog NO. Its the people that make them that way. We had one (died of old age) that was very sweet.

18 JoAnne July 22, 2010 at 7:15 PM

Breed-specific laws are counter-productive. Many mixed breed dogs “look” like pit bulls. In study after study, people who are shown pictures of dogs with known parentage get the breed wrong.

For a good discussion on breed-specific law – pro and con, go here:
http://www.dogbitelaw.com/PAGES/breedlaws.html

And, for a good overview of the problem, look at the whole site:

http://www.dogbitelaw.com/

It comes down to the owner. The owner is either responsible or not. Personally, unless a dog is injured and bites because it’s hurt, I’m of the opinion that one bite and you’re done. My dogs better not bite me unless I’m setting their broken leg with no anesthesia. But that took months of training and handling. We take dogs for granted and we get away with it most of the time because they are so attuned to us. But it’s up to us to learn good dog practices – after all, we’re the ones with the “big” brains!

19 blank July 22, 2010 at 7:15 PM

YES, ban pitbulls if they are train to attack.!!
Poor child and stupid owner for having that many pitbulls in his house1
Very disappointing!!!

20 MsAmber July 22, 2010 at 7:18 PM

Does anyone else think it’s ironic that CLAYCORD has adoptable animals on it’s site including a pitbull “Snoopy”?

I vote for PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY! This owners/parents or grandparents showed HUGE negligence. They are the ones that need to be punished!!!! If your going to take the responsibility to bring a child in this world than take the responsibility to look after them, not throw them to the wolves… PEOPLE are to blame here NOT dogs. PEOPLE PEOPLE PEOPLE Is anyone hearing me?

Any takers on standing up for personal responsibility????????

21 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 7:19 PM

Sorry pit bull supporters. I don’t want your damn dogs chewing on my kids. They and you are a menace to society. Move and take your damn menagerie with you.

22 ab July 22, 2010 at 7:20 PM

C’mon Major, you’re going to get a lot of knee jerk votes because of what happened today. Banning pit-bulls will not solve this problem, you would have to ban all dogs for that to take effect, and you’ll only create a black market for pit-bulls. Cities are going broke just delivering basic services as is, you’re better off stopping stupid people from having kids in the first place.

23 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 7:26 PM

I agree I don’t want my kid to get hurt by one or any other animal.They smell fear on you and for me it’s hard to pretend I am not frightened, they scare me and I am not taking any chances.

24 Phoenyx July 22, 2010 at 7:29 PM

I say ban Cocker Spaniels while we’re at it… those dogs are PSYCHO.

Ridiculous to ban any breed. Mandatory neutering, limited numbers, yes.

Better to focus on making responsible ownership mandatory for all dog owners, but that isn’t going to happen.

Anon 13, it is attitude like yours that would make me want to get a Pit, just to piss you off. But I’m a cat person. I don’t even really care for dogs.

25 Ck July 22, 2010 at 7:30 PM

I support a ban on a$$holes.

26 David1 July 22, 2010 at 7:31 PM

Anonymous #14

You have every right to not care to be around pit bulls or dogs in general. You do not have the right to tell others to move just because you dislike something.

YOU DON’T WANT DOGS AROUND, YOU MOVE AWAY. THEN EVERYONE WILL BE A LOT HAPPIER.

I feel sorry for you child or children, their parent is incredibly self centered.

Must be a democrate.

27 David July 22, 2010 at 7:32 PM

Where do you draw the line 100% pit bull 90% 50%, if he looks like a pit bull. Come on people it’s not the dog!!! Was that lady in San Francisco (Whipple i think) killed by a pit bull NO… Did we want to ban that type of dog. NO… Any kind of dog can kill (maybe not minature Chuawawa). It all depends how you train it and treat it…

28 Lifetime Claycordian July 22, 2010 at 7:32 PM

I myself am a Pit-bull owner. He has been with me since he was 6 weeks old. He grew up with other animals as well as being raised around children. I have taken him out to the park, walking around town, and everyplace in-between. He is now going on 6 years of age and not once in that time frame has he even growled, jumped or snapped at a child or anyone for that matter. Heck, he’s even been used as a jungle gym by by niece. He will bark at the door, like any other dog does when someone comes knocking, but thats normal. By no means am I condoning the horrible, horrible tragedy that took place today that took the life of a beautiful young child, but to suggest that all pit-bulls should be band in our town is absurd. Has anybody taken into consideration why a family would have 5 poorly maintained, and sadly neglected dogs at their home with a toddler of that age just walking around completely unattended. In this type of situation and using some of your own common sense would realize that these dogs were not members of the family, they weren’t cared for or even loved in anyway. They most likely were under-fed and kept in a state of wanting They more then likely were kept that way for unlawful purposes. I am truly sadden for the lost of any child or any individual to attacks of this nature, and I truly hope that the owner of these dogs is punished to the fullest extent of the law. I wish everyone to understand that I am not a bleeding heart animal activist. I’m just your average joe that actually looks at both sides of the coin equally and I use what god gave me…a brain and common sense, before I just go off half-cocked and want to just band things without a true understand of what has transpired

Thank you

29 Anon July 22, 2010 at 7:33 PM

I love pitts I wouldn’t be opposed to having them registered or a limited amount of them per home. This issue comes down to personal responsibility not the dogs…

30 Ricardoh July 22, 2010 at 7:34 PM

The dog was bred to fight. Get that through your head and stop peeing on our leg as you tell us you love your wonderful Pitt bull. The dogs were bred to kill. That is what they have done often in our country every year.

31 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 7:36 PM

Can’t support a ban, but support personal accountability.

32 Annonymous July 22, 2010 at 7:42 PM

If a city is willing to ban pitbulls, they should consider banning illegal immigrants first.

If pitbulls were banned, would SF be a “dog sanctuary city”?

33 Sulli05 July 22, 2010 at 7:46 PM

I agree there are a lot of idiot owners out there but you cannot ignore that pitbulls are very aggressive dogs. Yes other dogs have attacked but most killings are by pitbulls…..almost every time you read about a pitbull attack it results in severe or fatal injuries.

The sad thing is no one ever thinks it will happen to them. I am sure that this family never intended for this to happen….my thoughts and prayers go out to them and may that precious little boy rest in peace.

34 Blockhead July 22, 2010 at 8:00 PM

The YES vote on this is absolutely sickening. This is the United States people. Laws are excessive as it is. If anything we need to start thinking about lifting some bans and repealing some restrictive laws.

35 MGentry July 22, 2010 at 8:01 PM

“Can’t support a ban, but support personal accountability.”

i couldn’t have said it better…

36 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 8:08 PM

Pit bulls are naturally vicious dogs. But so are all dogs. This is there defense. We have to remember that this could have had happened weather the dog be German Shepperd, Akita, Rottweiler, Doberman Pinscher, Boxers and the list goes on. Also I’m sorry to say but, small children don’t know how to treat dogs, they pull on their tails, ears etc. I know its not the child’s fault but its not the dogs either. This need to be put on the parents. Why would any one think its okay to leave there child in a room with a group or dogs. I would never leave my child alone with my chichi. and Pit bulls are very loving family dogs but you should never have More then 2 and that goes with any group of large to medium dogs. when you have more then two they tend to get jealous and that’s when the fight start. This is a very tragic thing and i’m very sorry that it happend.

37 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 8:08 PM

I support any reactionary legislation that comes along. After all, what’s the point of having politicians with the power to prohibit stuff if they can’t use it in response to whatever the media is harping on at the moment?

38 Babs July 22, 2010 at 8:13 PM

David1, it is such a waste of your energy to try for a recall when the election is right around the corner. Go to a Council Mtg. and ask her to resign. Get behind a candidate that can take her out. So you recall her and she runs again in Nov. what have you accomplished?

It’s the power of the vote. Investigate the candidates, look who is running, can we say puppets of the same developers who put HA in place. Remember the more people they get to run, it’s harder for someone really good person to win.

This topic should be on another thread….So back to Pitts, When we moved here and got house insurance we had to state and agree to no to certain types of dogs and no trampolines. I agree that state prob won’t let a total ban but could manatory proof of insurance and then some huge fee if none is proven with dog license is issued. If dog is caught without license then up the fees and dog isn’t released until license/insurance (which not sure if you could even get)..

39 ACC July 22, 2010 at 8:16 PM

This is a tough one for me. I love pit bulls and American Staffordshire Terriers. They are BEAUTIFUL animals in so many ways. They are sweet and loving. Ours were trained for show and I just have so many good memories of owning/showing and playing with them during my teen years. Our female Staff would let the babies/kids play on her, pull her ears, ride on her – she didn’t care one lick how rough the kids got with her. Our male on the other hand – he separated himself from the kids. He wanted nothing to do with them. I don’t own pits anymore and we never had more than 2 that were the family dogs. We had 3 for a short period until we found the 3rd one a home. 5 is ALOT of any animal.

With all of what I said in this post, I would not support a ban on pit bulls. It all comes down to responsible dog ownership. Last summer, my full grown nephew (16 yrs old) tripped and fell in his back yard where the family’s 2 bull dogs were playing. For some reason, they attacked him. He had numerous bites all over him, legs, arms, ears, face. Thankfully his grandmother was in the yard and was able to stop the attack. There was NO provocation in that situation. Shall we ban bull dogs too? Again, it’s responsible ownership. My heart aches for this child’s family. I am SO sorry this has happened. I’m sick to my stomach. But why was the child unsupervised with a pack of dogs? I have 2 dogs and my 3 year old grandson is NEVER alone with them and they’re border collies. I don’t care how sweet my dogs are – how wonderful they are to me, NEVER are they alone with the children. That’s just how I make sure they are safe when they are at my house. This poor, poor child.

40 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 8:17 PM

Can we put a ban on “bad” owners. Chihuahuas and Mini-poodles bite just as much pitbulls do….so now what???

41 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 8:18 PM

I would also support a ban of pit bulls across the county. I’m afraid to walk past one.

42 B-rye July 22, 2010 at 8:18 PM

Pit bulls are the problem…. Kill the breed all of them all over the united states. I’ll be more then happy to help get rid of those monsters. It’d be the only time I’d ever consider kicking / killing a puppy..

Kill a pit-bull save a childs life…

43 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 8:21 PM

#17 you are right on. Any dog can attack, given a certain smell that might be different, a certain image of a person that might be different, or a movement that could be misconstrued. I don’t believe that any dog can be truly trusted 100% of the time, and even more so around children because their movements are so sporadic and animals look at them as prey.

44 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 8:26 PM

I know 6 people with pitbulls and every single one of them are sweet as can be. You wouldn’t feel threatened or anything if they came running to you.. Don’t ban pits it’s the owners that should be held responsible. If u want to ban a breed of dog then ban the annoying little yappy dogs that never stop barking. Ban poodles or any other small yelper. Pitbulls are good dogs. Ban illegal Mexicans and clean up the monument area.

45 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 8:28 PM

My GOD! I’m so sick and tired of the urban hyena, I mean pit bull, apologists with this “it’s the trainers (owners) fault” garbage. Some people keep lions as pets and claim they are the sweetest things as long as they are properly trained by the right owners. They claim lions aren’t dangerous. But I’ll tell you what, there is no way in hell I’ld want someone with a lion living next door. Period. I feel bad for anyone that has to live next door to someone with these ticking time bombs. I read the neighbor couldn’t let her kids play in front for fear that one of the dogs would get loose.

The only silver lining is that this pack of sweet dogs didn’t get loose and go on a much more lethal rampage attacking more folks.

I really wish there was some law against owning these wild dogs.

46 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 8:28 PM

B-rye…really? I think we can all agree that you aren’t smart enough to own a pit bull. Let’s move on from there.

1. Dogs kept in the garage are not family dogs.
2. Dogs should never be allowed unsupervised around young children regardless of breed.
3. Breed specific legislation is inherently flawed. Rottweillers are on the list, yet nobody’s talking about killing all the Rottweillers. Ten years ago they were. Rotties aren’t as popular so they aren’t in as much trouble because dumb asses aren’t getting them.

A dog is only as good as their trainer. Dumb ass owner, no training bad things happen. Sometimes really bad things. Arresting the owner was the right thing to do. Banning the breed is not.

I am not a pit bull owner, although mine died peacefully after 15 years and no bite history whatsoever.

47 Mom to 3 pits! July 22, 2010 at 8:30 PM

Reading Crap like this pisses me off! I own 3 pitbulls and they are my babies! They are the best pet I have ever had! AND I have 2 kids. And 4 year old and a 1 year old. They sleep with my kids, play with my kids, and my kids feet then and they are more gentle then ever when taking food from there hand! Go ahead everyone, tell me what a bad parent I am. Im sure thats what your all gonna do. I raised my dogs from when they were born! And thats what its all about. Giving them love and not raising them to be aggresive!!!

48 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 8:31 PM

I support the ban on anyone who wants to ban things.

49 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 8:32 PM

Kenny F.

You are the man! Funny and true. I would support the proposition as well.

50 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 8:34 PM

Sorry pit bull supporters but those dogs have a bad rep. Stop telling us stories about how sweet your dog is and asking us not to be ignorant, it’s not balancing the death of a 2 year old. For you hippies that like to keep saying “it’s not the dog, it’s the owner” then allow me to start carrying a loaded gun in public and claim “guns don’t kill people, people kill people and Im a good person” It’s the same thing. You don’t want us to judge but If I never judged anyone or anything based on… well judging, then everytime I saw a McDonalds’s commercial I’d go buy a damn hamburger because it looks so tasty, ignoring the fact it’s crap food. Then next time I see a lion I’d go pet it because Christian the lion was so cute in that youtube video. So please, stop being jerks in society and having pitbulls as pets. There is nothing special about that breed except bragging rights. We all know it’s just a reason for you and your non pitbull owner friends to talk about how great your dog is and sharing stories about those scared reactions from family members when they ask “is he friendly” so you can giggle and say “of course he is, Im a responsible owner!” The only exception I have for pitbulls is if you need a watch dog for a large private property, but America keep them out of suburbia for god sakes we are not going to pretend. Hey this goes for people to… If you’re a black man who walks tough and wears a hoodie, stop doing it you’re being judged by 99% of the population.

51 Anon July 22, 2010 at 8:37 PM

It’s not the dogs’ fault. Let’s outlaw the idiots who should not raise children nor animals. Enough of all this politically correct reactive BS to take away more of our societal freedoms.

Can we please think about this stuff before proposing this stuff?

Thanks for posting this.

52 MGentry July 22, 2010 at 8:37 PM

“I would also support a ban of pit bulls across the county. I’m afraid to walk past one.”

I’m afraid to walk by young black men. Chould we ban them, too? They tend to cause a lot of trouble as well…

53 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 8:38 PM

jesus christ, ban them already! this ” it’s the owner, not the dog, ” argument is BOGUS. for a hundred years pitbulls have been bred to be AGGRESSIVE and DEADLY. you have no clue how they’ll act until that time comes!!!!!! BAN THEM.

54 Drvrdadca July 22, 2010 at 8:39 PM

One Word – EXTINCTION

55 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 8:45 PM

So, when do you hold the owner accountable? ‘Before’ or ‘after’ the dog has mauled someone to death?

I guess the best thing would be to hold the owners accountable BEFORE their dogs kill. In that case, the county should collect all the pits and send the owners the cost of putting down the dog.

56 anon July 22, 2010 at 8:47 PM

ahhh
Mr Mayor I think your vote is rigged because most of the comments are aginst a ban but the vote in support, whats up with that, ah wait I know all the ignorant people are voting but not bothering to read the comments maybe thats it.

57 anonymous July 22, 2010 at 8:47 PM

I would definitely support a ban on pitbulls in Concord. They are banned in the Netherlands and it works just fine. Any pitbulls born after the date of the ban were confiscated. They don’t have vicious dog attacks in the Netherlands.

58 Kristen July 22, 2010 at 8:48 PM

I am a dog groomer, and I deal with dogs 5 days of the week at work. And let me tell you; everytime I have ever been bit it’s been by a small dog. NEVER a pittbull or any other larger dog. It’s the owners!! You have to take the time to teach yourself about the breed you are getting and how to handle them. Then you need to teach the dog. Owners have to be smarter than the dog. If you ban Pitts’ from Concord, that’s just the begining. Soon it will be Rott’s, German Sheps, Doberman’s, New Foundlands, etc. If it starts it will probably not stop.

59 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 8:50 PM

Folks, it’s all so simple. Good kids come from good parents and good pets have good owners. Trust me on this one…

60 Nolan July 22, 2010 at 8:54 PM

Why don’t we ban people who don’t know how to raise dogs? The most dangerous breed is the bad owners……I say arrest to owners who neglect dogs or any animal. STOP THE HATE ON PITBULLS!

61 AnonEmouse July 22, 2010 at 9:05 PM

Just goes to show the majority are stupid reactionary idiots.
Ban them! Then the irresponsible owners will just neglect and fight pnchser or rottweilers or another breed… DUH!
I was stepfather to a PBT mix for a couple years she was as adorable and affectionate as my own mutt dog (Lab/Shep/Etc). At first she was terriorial with my own dog until I retrained her and put her in her place in the pack.
My ex rarely gave her affection or attention. After supervised feedings, group walks and lots of structured play, she adjusted just fine to her new home. A couple ears and legs got bit but that would happen integrating any dog into a new home. At first they couldn’t be left alone in the same room, and at the end they were playing, eating and sleeping together. My dog never did understand what happened to her packmate. (Broke up with the ex.) She was sad for a long time after. I call BS on the savage pitbull argument. My dog would be just as aggressive if she wasn’t brought up properly.
To me it sounds like these poeple had no business owning dogs let alone reproducing children…

62 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 9:07 PM

This is equivalent to racism with humans. So many ignorant people out there. It’s the owners as compared to parents with their children. Aren’t humans by nature “aggressive” or “deadly”…..some of you out there need to educate yourselves.

63 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 9:10 PM

Nolan

I’ll stop the ‘hating on’ PIts once the Pits stop the ‘mauling on’ toddlers.

64 David1 July 22, 2010 at 9:10 PM

There has been a lot of conversation pro and con on pit bulls. And I see it as a right and left issue.

A person who thinks toward the right or conservative can decide if he wants one or not. He can decide.

A person on the left, or modern progressive as they call themselves now, decides he does not like pit bulls so no one should have a pit bull.

The problem is not the dog, it is the people who train them. That is the bottom line.

Just like human children, if you train them to rob or don’t teach them at all they become hoods or drug users or something else that keeps the police busy. Should we ban bad parents? Well, that is worth dicsusson but at another time.

If you love and teach your child kindness and goodness, chances are pretty good they will turn out to be good people.

So, the blame has to go to the owners of the dogs. They are ultimatly responsible for the dogs actions just as they should be responsible for the action of their children.

Some may think that the analogy is a bit of a stretch, but I look at it this way. Both children and pets thrive in a loving caring environment and do not thrive in a harsh or hostile environment.

At the end, it is only the people who own the pets who are responsible for their behavior. Anything else is like blaming the hammer for hitting your thumb.

65 Ray July 22, 2010 at 9:13 PM

“Why do You continue to run “Snoopy’s” picture on the adoptable animals page? ..

66 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 9:16 PM

Kristen

Once yorkies and beagles start ‘mauling kids to death’ on a regular basis, I’d say ban them too. We are not talking biting here, we’re talking mauling. To all the idiot Pit owners there’s a difference between biting and mauling.

67 George July 22, 2010 at 9:21 PM

Ban idiots from owning dogs rather than blaming the animal.

68 David1 July 22, 2010 at 9:21 PM

anonymous 57
If you like the way things are done in the Netherlands perhaps you should live there.

Confiscation of animals? Then what, difficult children? We have that problem today with children being taken from parents for some pretty vague reasons.

It is not the government bureaucratic oafs who should have any control over the citizens. The citizens need to be responsible, accountable and abide by simple rules of law that are straight forward and no nonsense.

69 ghoonsquad July 22, 2010 at 9:22 PM

Why not ban gang baning illegals first and then enforce the law. That should take a big chunk out of the ignorant dog owners in our society.

70 @#!$!%# July 22, 2010 at 9:22 PM

“Hey, this Mexican raped a girl last night. Let’s ban all Mexicans from Concord and maybe girls won’t get raped anymore!”

The idea of banning Pitbulls is exactly the same, and just as idiotic.

71 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 9:23 PM

All dogs are supposed to be licensed. We should add a requirement that every three years any dog over 20 lbs in weight be tested by a vet for biting reflexes and reactions to provocations. A standardized test would identify dogs of any breed that have a tendency to bite. Potential biters would be assessed a license fee that would cover the cost of home inspections by the county or city to assure warning signs are up, fences are adequate, and there are no children in the home that could be threatened.

It would be like probation for dogs.

Any dog owner who does not follow the rules should be fined $10,000. That woiuld solve the problem.

72 David1 July 22, 2010 at 9:25 PM

Barb, you are correct and I have pretty much stopped my work on the recall.

I have been to council meetings and I have not spoken on the record. I will do so at the next meeting.

Thanks

73 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 9:27 PM

I would never leave my child alone with any breed of dog. I grew up with pit bulls and never have I had an issue. If pit bulls were to be banned I would leave the city. I do feel bad for the child and it saddens me that this happened. But as we know when a dog is agitated it will show.

74 Trish July 22, 2010 at 9:32 PM

Banning a breed won’t save any lives . It’s about personal responsibility .
This was a tragic incident .

75 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 9:33 PM

#50 you are an idiot

76 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 9:33 PM

If you really love the breed you would support a ban or at least having to have a permanent. These dogs are filling up the shelters and being treated like toys that people just toss out when they are done. How many pits are put down a day because the shelters are over run with them? How many of these pits live a horrible life in the back yard chained up? If its not the dog then the people who Owen them are not responsible enough to have them. You would think that pit lovers would be happy to not have so many put to death. or treated poorly. Just because you treat you pit well does not mean that you should not care how the others are treated. Basically you are selfish.

77 JoAnne July 22, 2010 at 9:34 PM

“All dogs are supposed to be licensed. We should add a requirement that every three years any dog over 20 lbs in weight be tested by a vet for biting reflexes and reactions to provocations. A standardized test would identify dogs of any breed that have a tendency to bite. Potential biters would be assessed a license fee that would cover the cost of home inspections by the county or city to assure warning signs are up, fences are adequate, and there are no children in the home that could be threatened.”

Do you have any idea how much that would cost?

78 Anderson July 22, 2010 at 9:36 PM

The problem isn’t owning pit bulls; it’s owning *multiple* pit bulls and leaving them alone to start behaving like a vicious pack. The real issue is responsible and competent pet ownership, and heck, so many people fall down on *that* in so many ways with any breed or species I’d support a ban on unlicensed pet ownership *period*. People need to prove they are competent and capable of providing responsible care, or they shouldn’t have pets of any kind, and a breed like pit bulls needs more capable care than most. Letting small children wander into the middle of a pack of pit bulls strikes me as the most irresponsible kind of parenting, so let’s start licensing people to have children, too. Geez, so many problems would be solved by *that*…

79 anonymous July 22, 2010 at 9:36 PM

To: 73 Dont let the door hit you on the way out. Buy!

80 anon July 22, 2010 at 9:36 PM

Mr. Mayor….your poll is not accurate. I just signed on, saw the chance to vote, so I did. It responded that I had already voted #18. Not important, but it’s wrong….
Just fyi

81 Kevin July 22, 2010 at 9:38 PM

I’d rather ban bad parents.

I’m just too depressed about this tragedy to scapegoat a breed of dogs. The owners are usually the problem. I don’t like pitbulls and I think they ARE dangerous not matter what pitbull owners insist, but these people would just go out and get the next most dangerous dog.

82 Anderson July 22, 2010 at 9:39 PM

“…but state law prohibits banning certain breeds from an entire city.”

OK, but I see some loopholes here:

* Ban them from *parts* of the city. Namely, any household with small children.
* Ban known violent breeds in general. Any way that could be squeaked by the “banning certain breeds” stipulation? Might need a pack of lawyers to work on that one. Oh, wait…

83 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 9:42 PM

If almost any other dog has a bad moment, someone may get bitten, but will not be maimed for life or killed, and the actuarial risk is accordingly reasonable. If a pit bull terrier or a Rottweiler has a bad moment, often someone is maimed or killed–and that has now created off-the-chart actuarial risk, for which the dogs as well as their victims are paying the price.

84 MO July 22, 2010 at 9:42 PM

LegalMatch Law Library Managing Editor, Ken LaMance, Attorney at Law
Rottweiler and Pit Bull Laws
Where Can I Own a Rottweiler or Pit Bull?

The answer to this question depends on the city in which you live. Although no states have restricted Rottweilers or pit bulls, many cities and towns do. For example, the city of Santa Monica in California has restricted pit bulls, and Walkerton, Indiana has banned Rottweilers. Other places such as Westfield, Illinois and Jacksonville, Lonoke, North Little Rock and Beebe Arkansas have banned Dobermans. These types of restrictive laws are called Breed Specific Legislation. Refer to this list of breed specific legislation ban cities.
http://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/rottweiler-and-pit-bull-laws.html
———————

We as aware adults should have a Lawyer and know all the laws when we keep a Specific Mean Breed.
Where I live it’s a status symbol to have a ”big mean dog” riding in your pickup bed.
Within the city there is an ordinance saying you register that dog for 100 bucks so the city knows where they are.
Laws only work where there a people who will use them.
Who is going to fine that Redneck with his toothy grinning dog?

But then I live in the woods, where the law is a tease.
We need to make laws that are tough, we need to stand behind the law,and make sure our neighborhoods are safe.

IMHO Laws were made to be broken.
~
sad-

85 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 9:43 PM

Dog Bite-related Fatalities in the United States.[49]
Year Total Involving pit bull-type dogs
2005 28 16 (57%)
2006 29 15 (51%)
2007 34 18 (53%)
2008 23 9 (39%)
2009 30 10 (33%)

86 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 9:43 PM

Anonymous 50
You are most definatly a modern progressive. You don’t like the dog so no one should like the dog. Then you call people hippies and jerks because they chose not to belove as you do or follow your twisted analogy and logic.

People should be free to own any animal they wish. The community needs to decide (not the state or federal government) what rules the community members need to observe.

I am not sure why you brought up guns, the comments made no real sense. You want to carry one, go ahead. Just be careful who you decide to shoot. McDonalds? If you want to eat there go ahead. You have the choice. You have all sorts of choices, don’t you dare take away mine.

87 Anon July 22, 2010 at 9:44 PM

I’m really tired of the “it’s not the dog, it’s the owner” crap. Sorry, but it’s all just words. You can hold owners accountable all you want, you can even execute an irresponsible pit owner, that’s all fine and dandy… But it’s not going to keep another idiot from collecting pits and it’s not going to bring this poor two-year-old back to life.

Fact: Pits are disproportionately responsible for more dog mauling deaths than any other breed. I don’t think there’s any reason to hate them; I’m sure most are wonderful pets and that many pit owners are responsible people. But because of their physical capabilities, pits are also are disproportionally desired by people who want an aggressive, threatening animal.

Rather than ban them, but out of respect to the innocent boy who lost his life, I would support a city ordinance requiring all pit bull owners and owners of pit mixes to show proof that they have completed a dog obedience class and, if they have a male pit, to neuter them.

88 JoAnne July 22, 2010 at 9:44 PM

I would definitely support a ban on pitbulls in Concord. They are banned in the Netherlands and it works just fine. Any pitbulls born after the date of the ban were confiscated. They don’t have vicious dog attacks in the Netherlands.

No, not true.

http://www.expatica.com/nl/news/local_news/Dutch-Agriculture-Minister-scraps-pit-bull-ban.html

89 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 9:45 PM

Anon #59, I could not agree more. Pit Bulls, Staffordshire Terriers etc are dogs with powerful jaws capable of serious damage and obviously death. It comes down to the owners and how the dogs are raised. I grew up with a pit bull who was docile with women, children(one sister hit it with a large stick and it just rolled over like he wanted more), and our cats. Strange men raised the hair on his back until he got to know the person. When we tried to get another dog who chased the cats this dog followed suit but stopped when we got rid of the other dog. It was the responsible thing to do for the safety of the cats and possibly the kids. This was my favorite dog growing up and my Dad always said he “feared for the safety of anyone threatening his wife or kids” with this dog but he provided a sense of security when he was not home. This is like anything else, you can’t fix stupid or ban it!!

90 Ian July 22, 2010 at 9:52 PM

Could you imagine the mass exodus from Concord to Pittsburg/Antioch?

91 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 10:01 PM

Ray #65

Why remove Snoopy from this page? What did he do?

And do you really think the SPCA would be putting him up for adoption if he was a problem dog? I seriously doubt it.

92 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 10:05 PM

Unfortunately we may never know what “triggered” these three Pit bulls to attack this child, – the victim/witness is dead.
The person who owned the dogs and the person who should have been supervising this child are to blame. There should have been a lock on that door to the garage, which a toddler could not open.
Banning the breed will not work. In Denver, Colorado and Miami-Dade County, Florida despite the “ban on the breed’ there are still pit bulls. When you ban a breed- the breeding is driven underground so more and more ignorant people trying to make a buck, breed and sell them. These backyard breeders tend to breed for aggression, outrageous size and other characteristics that are not on the AKC list of desirable traits.

93 Just a Mom July 22, 2010 at 10:05 PM

It’s truly unfortunate that this poor child lost it’s life at all!!! I can only assume that it was due to lack of parental supervision and/or the dog not being properly cared for or socialized. I absolutely would NOT support a ban on pit bulls. I would however support a ban on the idiots that own any animal that attacks or kills a human being.

94 Former Shelter Volunteer July 22, 2010 at 10:07 PM

I use to volunteer one day per week at an animal shelter for almost two years and have worked with literally hundreds of Pitbulls. My experience at the shelter taught me that there are some wonderful Pit-bulls (especially the one that I ended up adopting). However, there are others who came to the shelter after being mistreated, neglected and abused. These dogs were usually beyond saving.

Having a Pit-bull is a HUGE responsibility. I normally wouldn’t recommend them around small children. More importantly, I would definitely not recommend that anyone have more than one Pit-bull or Rottweiler etc. around small children. Having 5 Pit-bulls, a 2 year old and a 4 year old in the same house is a recipe for disaster.

As far as the hysteria….You are far more likely to be attacked and killed by a person in Claycord than you are a dog of any kind. Maybe we should ban cars. They kill tons of people in Claycord.

95 9 deuce daisy July 22, 2010 at 10:11 PM

Leave Snoopy alone. Yesterday you didnt give a thought to pits and next week you wont care, again.

96 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 10:12 PM

Banning Pitbulls is not the answer – no child of that age should be left unattended, as this child was…. Step-Grandpa or whatever should be held accountable…..

97 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 10:22 PM

To all the posters saying that “if a pit bull has good owners, he will be a sweet, good dog!”: You have to remember, behavior is not determined entirely by the environment the dog was raised in. Behavior also has a genetic basis. No one knows what percent of behavior comes from genes and what percent comes from environmental influences. My guess would be over 50% genetics determine behavior, but that is only a guess.

98 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 10:42 PM

Anon #75

Thank you, I agree

99 A non July 22, 2010 at 10:43 PM

To ban a breed of dog is like banning a race of people; there just not all the same and much of it is how there bred and raised; other breeds kill; look at the mastiff’s that killed that woman in SF.
The state of Colorado banned all Pit-bulls my neighbors moved there and had their gentle sweet, beautiful, red nose pit taken. Luckily a friend from California agreed to take the dog and it was saved but not before it chewed its own feet in the pound out of fear. When it was flown back the baggage handlers from Alaska Airlines dropped the cage on the tarmac at SFO the dogs back was injured and it was running around loose around the planes, the ladies had to ride out on the truck to call back the dog.

100 Send Mom to Jail/Call CPS July 22, 2010 at 10:49 PM

#47 – Please leave your and your childrens’ names. When your child is mauled to death because of your irresponsibility, I would like to attend his/her funeral, and I would want to be sure you are put away! How DARE you allow those dogs to sleep with your children!!! Save your $$!!!!!!!!

101 N.C $$ July 22, 2010 at 10:52 PM

PITBULLS AREN’T THA PROMBLEM, PEOPLE WHO CAN’T CAR FOR PITTBULLS PROPERLY ARE THA PROMBLEM. I HATE WEN PEOPLE DNT HANDLE PITTBULLS THA RIGHT WAY. THIS IS A SAD LOST CAUSED BY PEER IGNORANCE

102 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 11:18 PM

aye you csn mske any dog a devil dog not just only pit’s so i think they shouldnt ban pitt’s

103 Anon July 22, 2010 at 11:22 PM

I would support a ban because those who are most vulnerable must be protected.

104 Anonymous July 22, 2010 at 11:23 PM

what idiots let their 2 year old in a garage un-supervised? there is a million things that can go bad in a garage for a 2 year old without the dogs being there. I own a pitbull and he is the nicest, loyalist, sweetest, most lick you to death dog you will ever meet, and plays daily with 2 small dogs( 7 and 13 lbs) and he is 105lbs and they all play great together. it is TOTALLY and 100% solely on the owners and the upbringing of the dog. it is NOT normal for a family to have 5 pitbulls, there must have been illegal activity going on with the house and/or dogs. This is a sad sad story, and it sucks that it will give all properly raised pitbulls a “bad name” as well

105 spellchecker July 22, 2010 at 11:28 PM

I support the ban on morons who continually misspell words and/or use them in the wrong context. Weather = temperature outdoors. Their = possession. And, Anon #50: Love, love, love your comment BUT its “too” as in “also” not “to” :)

106 Nick July 22, 2010 at 11:31 PM

Actually, the problem is fads. The problem with rottweilers was that they were very popular a while back, so they were being bred like rabbits. When more dogs are bred, the percentage of “poorly bred” dogs does not increase; but their numbers do. Breeders who turn these poor dogs into money making machines are the real culprits. If I was locked in a 20 sq ft cage with 10 other dogs for 3 months, I would be snappy with people too. We have owned 2 rottweilers, and have never had any sort of a problem with them. The second dog was from an abused home, so she was frightened and skittish at first. After a few months of family life she opened up, and 4 years later her personality is friendly as can be! It is a true fact, that pitbulls and rottweilers are more work than other dogs though, they need more care and attention.

107 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 12:01 AM

I love my dog and he is my sons best friend had him since he was a pup and he has never once bitten anybody. My son has his friends over all the time and they play with the dog and have 3 cats that the dog loves never would hurt a single person welcomed in my home. But if you came here and your not supposed to be well than maybe he might go after you to let you know this is his house but he is trained to be the guardian of my home. he is now 12 and is in the house all the time and loves us and we love him. If they tried to take my dog they would have one hell of a fight on there hands..

108 Regulations for all dogs and owners needed July 23, 2010 at 12:09 AM

Banning one breed is not the answer. Three dogs per household is too many; two are more than enough.

We need more regulation for ALL owners to follow. The ability to report dogs and owners who do not behave appropriately and know that action will be taken to correct problem(s) is very important.

109 anon July 23, 2010 at 12:10 AM

Ha Joanne has no clue, see just more ignorance.

110 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 12:15 AM

For once, I think San Francisco got something right. They passed a law requiring pit bulls to be fixed.

I would also vote YES to:
No pit bulls for Convicted felons.
Can’t own more than one pit bull.
Pit bull must be micro chipped with address and owners name.
All veterinarians are required to report pit bulls in violation of county and city laws.
No WIC for pit bull owners.
No affordable housing for pit bull owners.
No medical marijuana for pit bull owners.
and Pit Bulls cannot be within 1,000 ft of a school.

111 afoundingfather July 23, 2010 at 12:15 AM

How about we ban freedom in the city of Concord too…
This thread is a joke.
I hate pitbulls and kids, is that legal?

112 Chris July 23, 2010 at 12:19 AM

Lets ban irresponsible pet owners instead!!!! It makes me so mad to think that people dont see the real problem here pit-bulls are not the problem its the people who own them. This is a people problem!!!

113 anon July 23, 2010 at 12:58 AM

#110 great suggestions. I would still add when licensing owner needs to show house/apt insurance to cover any dog.

I bet money a lot of people with certain dogs don’t tell their insurance, think what would happen in this case….child gets killed by someone’s dog and sues that person. Can you imagine what would happen to that peson’s house insurance coverage.

114 Babs July 23, 2010 at 1:00 AM

David1, hope to meet you next Tues., I usually sit in the back with walker.

115 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 1:11 AM

Are you people serious. Ban all the idiots who know nothing about pit bulls. My pit bulls are my babies, they are the sweetest breed you’d ever want to meet. There are how you train them. Our dog sleeps with us. He thinks he’s human. The best breed all around.

116 warren July 23, 2010 at 6:17 AM

when I pressed “no” on the poll no was the first option then when the results were shown no was on the bottom,there is a majority of comments for pitbulls and yet the “poll” shos a majority want a ban, I question the credibility of this poll.

117 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 6:36 AM

For all you people who say it is the owners…how would you feel if you had a neighbor who had a pit bull and the pit bull kept jumping in your back yard. We would like to enjoy our yard and our neighbors have tried to work with us, but the fact of the matter is that our kids are afraid of their own back yard because of the dog! I don’t care how nice a dog is, if the dog for centuries has been bred to kill it will kill regardless of how it has been raised. If you want to own a pit bull you have to live with the consequences of your choice, but don’t make your bad choice a tragedy for someone else!

118 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 6:50 AM

I understand the part that an owner has in an aggressive dog. when attacks are reported look at the high percentage are from pits. the breed also has to play a part in the high percentage, as many owners are found to say, the dog never showed signs of aggression before. so it would be interesting to get some real stats to find out what breeds are involved in attacks and has the dog been aggressive prior, as well as some info. on the owner such as a criminal record. so definitely come down harder on owners with aggressive dogs that lose control of them, that would help take care of that problem, but also take into consideration the real facts on the pit what really is the nature. is the pit more unpredictable and does it have more of a tendency to attack? anyone have any real facts?

119 I'm just saying July 23, 2010 at 7:08 AM

OH #ELL YES!

120 aDingoAteMyBaby July 23, 2010 at 7:10 AM

http://www.dogbitelaw.com/PAGES/statistics.html

Merritt Clifton, editor of Animal People, has conducted an unusually detailed study of dog bites from 1982 to the present. (Clifton, Dog attack deaths and maimings, U.S. & Canada, September 1982 to November 13, 2006; click here to read it.) The Clifton study show the number of serious canine-inflicted injuries by breed. The author’s observations about the breeds and generally how to deal with the dangerous dog problem are enlightening.

According to the Clifton study, pit bulls, Rottweilers, Presa Canarios and their mixes are responsible for 74% of attacks that were included in the study, 68% of the attacks upon children, 82% of the attacks upon adults, 65% of the deaths, and 68% of the maimings. In more than two-thirds of the cases included in the study, the life-threatening or fatal attack was apparently the first known dangerous behavior by the animal in question. Clifton states:

If almost any other dog has a bad moment, someone may get bitten, but will not be maimed for life or killed, and the actuarial risk is accordingly reasonable. If a pit bull terrier or a Rottweiler has a bad moment, often someone is maimed or killed–and that has now created off-the-chart actuarial risk, for which the dogs as well as their victims are paying the price.

Clifton’s opinions are as interesting as his statistics. For example, he says, “Pit bulls and Rottweilers are accordingly dogs who not only must be handled with special precautions, but also must be regulated with special requirements appropriate to the risk they may pose to the public and other animals, if they are to be kept at all.”

121 TG from Clayton July 23, 2010 at 7:20 AM

“It’s not the breed – it”s the breeder”
Yeah but the problem most of the owners are irresponsible idiots. Most of them are gang banging wannabee thug tatted out losers. Whenever one comes into the dog park – I immediately look for the owner (I can usually pick him out of a lineup) and take my dog out. The only bad incidents I have seen at the (3) dog parks I go to have all involved un-neutered pit bulls.

122 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 7:23 AM

I agree this is a people problem. An example is El Dorado Middle School recreation area. The sign reads dogs must be on lease, but everyday adults have their pets off lead letting them run and not bothering to pick up their dogs droppings. I have to admit I have a fear when I see a pit or any other dog off lead. It can no longer take my dog there because of the dogs off lead. Come on Animal Services do something about this problem before there is a problem at this site. It is only a matter of time before someone gets bitten.

123 Antler July 23, 2010 at 7:29 AM

I have been feeling sad also for the paramedics, the police, and the emergency room staff who received what was left of the small child’s body. Yes, they are professionals who have “seen it all”; but the emotional impact of this particular tragedy on them must be horrific. My sincere gratitude to them for being there for all of us at any hour of the day or night.

124 MO July 23, 2010 at 7:30 AM

to 107

Not yet.
What if one of those kids, appears to not be welcome by a stamping foot, a scream for fun, rough housing..where the dog thinks ”that visitor” is harming your family?
What if?

You can GUARANTEE us that this dog ALWAYS KNOWS the difference between ”good” guests and ”bad” guests.?

Totally GUARANTEE us?

125 sv_1 July 23, 2010 at 7:37 AM

Ban swimming pools. Ban cars. Ban bicyles. All of these kill more people than pitbulls. Where is the outcry? Or are you “progressives” still waiting for the media to tell you?

I guess I shouldn’t be surprised by the reactions here though, I’ve known for a long time that I am surrounded by freedom hating apologists.

Btw kevin f. “Armor piercing” rounds are not illegal…

126 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 7:41 AM

I think that there should be more stringent criteria for a person wanting to adopt a pitbull as opposed to say, a cocker spaniel. I agree that if a pitbull is loved and treated right, the dog is very safe, even around children.

127 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 7:54 AM

“Could you imagine the mass exodus from Concord to Pittsburg/Antioch?”

Good point, Ian… maybe I’ll change my vote. It does seems wanna-be thugs own 90% of the pitts in the area, so that might help to improve things on one end.

128 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 8:02 AM

Breed Bans are illegal under the California Ag code- Opportunist and King of the Nanny State Gavin Newsom tried this. What is allowed is mandatory Spay and Neuter – SB861. Now, this can be enacted as Breed Specific or all breeds. The county would save a whole lot of money if they enacted mandatory spay and neuter requirements for all breeds with exceptions for legitimate breeders.

129 anon July 23, 2010 at 8:04 AM

From my understanding the pit bull was created to be a fighting dog. These dogs are more powerful and potentially dangerous than most other dog breeds. Sure if they are raised properly I hear they can be sweet loving dog. I had a pit bull/chow mix and he was very gentle and never showed any agression, he was a sweet dog. So yes I do believe the owners are the problem in some respects but at the same time I also think its the fact that the pit bull can be a very dangerous animal, I would support a ban on pit bulls just because of their potential.

130 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 8:07 AM

I could not support a ban on pit bulls. However, I would surely like to increase education for dog owners so that all dogs are trained properly and so that owners understand what their dogs are capable of.

I used to have a cute 25 pound Lhasa Apso. He was very unfriendly and I had to keep him away from people. I would never have adopted him had I known. I now have a cute 10 pound poodle mix who loves everyone. I let her go places with me and socialize. I still watch her carefully when she is around children. Just makes sense.

131 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 8:12 AM

one maybe two but five! come on.

132 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 8:14 AM

What about the law similar to SF. All Pits must be fixed…

133 JJ July 23, 2010 at 8:16 AM

Well said, Antler.

134 Nikki P July 23, 2010 at 8:25 AM

This is ridiculous- even the idea of it. Pit-bulls aren’t the danger it’s the people! How many pit-bulls have killed someone this year in Concord and how many people killed people this year?. Do the f’n math. Cars are the #1 killer in the U.S. that doesn’t mean we should all ban cars now does it?

If we should ban anything regarding dogs…it should be breeding. Their are thousands of animals waiting to be rescued or waiting to be euthanized in our County.

I find it very sad that their are so many people out there that do NOT like animals or have pets, yet they are quick to comment on issues they have no experience with. Get educated, get experience and find some compassion.

135 Dave July 23, 2010 at 8:25 AM

I have a question:
Why did this man have 5 Pit- bulls?
Why were these Pit-bulls not neuter?
What else was going on here to have that many pits at one home.
Just a thought as to what else was going on here besides this tragedy that happen.

136 jtkatec July 23, 2010 at 8:38 AM

I own two Dalmations and one little spaniel mix. Honestly, when kids run up to the Dals I stand in front of the Dals because I genuinely don’t know what may happen.

I’m no mind-reader of a dog

I can be a bitch at times and cranky and so can the dogs, so my body is always between the little kids and the dogs.

A message to all the Dog owners out there – you best inform your homeowners insurer you own a dog, any type of dog. Most insurers will put an exclusion on your policy for any liability caused for any type of dog.

If you don’t declare the dog, you are violation of your insurance terms and conditions and the insurer can cancel your policy.

Then again, some insurers only care about certain breeds.

137 Anon July 23, 2010 at 8:44 AM

BLAME THE DEED….
NOT THE BREED!!!

138 anonymous July 23, 2010 at 8:44 AM

According to dogsbite.org, the following cities have mandatory sterilization ordinances for Pit Bulls:

Gilroy, Lancaster, Manteca, Ripon, San Bernardino, San Francisco, and Sonoma County.

139 anonymous July 23, 2010 at 8:59 AM

I was mauled by a Pit Bull a few years ago. In addition to enacting spay and neuter laws, I like the ideas that #110 outlined:

No pit bulls for Convicted felons.
Can’t own more than one pit bull.
Pit bull must be micro chipped with address and owners name.
All veterinarians are required to report pit bulls in violation of county and city laws.
No WIC (food stamps) for pit bull owners.
No affordable housing for pit bull owners.
No medical marijuana for pit bull owners.
and Pit Bulls cannot be within 1,000 ft of a school.

I would add: set up a Pit Bull Hotline for the City of Concord, and enforcement authority that would include immediately taking away any problem dogs from their owners, and having them put down. I think that alone would eliminate about half the Pit Bulls in Concord.

140 aDingoAteMyBaby July 23, 2010 at 9:02 AM

1) You can’t compare a dog to an inanimate object. A car/swimming pool/gun isn’t going to jump a fence and attack someone. They also won’t act unpredictably in groups or around children.
2) You can’t compare banning an animal to banning a person/race. Dogs don’t get the rights of people and no matter how much a person loves one, will never be people or deserve human rights.
3) Based on statistics, some breeds of dogs are lethal. They should be treated as a weapon. Require background checks, registration, laws around how they should be secured, etc. If we want people to be responsible for their animals, let’s make sure they can be before they get one.

Personally, I have had run-in’s with pitt bulls in my neighborhoods. Bad owners have allowed them to run loose (actually break out of a back yard that wasn’t secure) and run around the neighborhood on numerous occasions. On time the pair ran down and slaughtered another neighbors cat. With small children who have every right to play ball in their front yard also in the neighborhood, it makes for an unsafe environment. It is very unfair to the people in the neighborhood when a lethal weapon isn’t secured properly. Like with guns, I don’t oppose people owning them but my expectation is that the people who do have them are qualified/approved to own one. The pain and aggravation of dealing with the paperwork should be on the owner and not those who are impacted by the person owning the weapon.

141 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 9:09 AM

Mayor since the likelihood of an all out ban is almost mill, maybe the poll can be about a mandatory spay and neuter. Ktvu reports it is working in San Francisco . They also noted that our own contra costa supervisors struck it down a few years ago thinking there was not enough public support or resources.

142 anonymous July 23, 2010 at 9:11 AM

@ Antler –
I’ve been thinking the same thing. And for the cops, it very well could be the same ones that responded to the attempt murder/suicide two days before. It’s just ugly all the way around.

@ Mayor -
I’m seeing comments awaiting moderation….not sure I should be seeing those.

143 ConcordCatLady July 23, 2010 at 9:21 AM

If they were to be banned in Concord, what would happen to all the ones people already own?

Almost any large dog has the potential to be taught to be viscious. It’s stupid to single out a specific breed. Most of the pit bulls I’ve ever come across have been totally sweet and loving animals. I think they could certainly tighten restrictions on owning large dogs, the number you can have, owning them with children, etc. But a full out ban on pit bulls is rediculous.

144 nonymous July 23, 2010 at 9:24 AM

banning a dog breed will result in people smuggling them in, like ferrets and oh.. drugs! It’d ridiculous to think about it.

San Francisco has a law that states all dog owners MUST neuter or spay their pets. According to channel 2 new this morning, this law has had positive affects. the animals aren’t as wild looking for a good time they aren’t going to get and redcuces the aggressiveness.

Well once again.. Claycord gets on the national news for some dog owner’s lack of common sense.

It’s not the dog, it’s the owner at fault.

145 Sciopio Africanus July 23, 2010 at 9:42 AM

Anyone who feels pit bulls are nice dogs should go into the woods and hug a wolverine.

146 Christine Johnson July 23, 2010 at 10:00 AM

Take a minute to watch this. Make an educated decision…
http://www.hellobully.com/pb101/pitbull101.html

The site as a whole is great.
http://www.hellobully.com/bsledu.html.

147 Jirina July 23, 2010 at 10:00 AM

NO, I would not support a ban on ANY specific dog breed, I would however like to see CA Senate Bill 250 passed (mandatory spaying and neutering of dogs & cats) It didn’t pass last year but I would like to see it re-introduced and passed in the near future, I would vote YES for that.

148 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 10:01 AM

Anon 126 – As a responsible pit owner I completely agree with the idea that additional criteria for the adoption of larger breeds should be in place for the protection of the animals and people.

149 wahhoon July 23, 2010 at 10:09 AM

anyone who makes a comment that a pitbull is allways agresseve who has never owned, has no idea what there talking about, if they had one and raised it right they would feel different!

150 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 10:13 AM

Ok so when I was in high school I got a pit bull pup. She was my best friend thru college and beyond. She was good around me and my family (my brother was 6 when I got her) . Always great with everyone. Our pets, our friends…. Great dog. Once in college my roommates cat got out and was in a fight at our front door with another cat. My roommate ran out of course to protect her cat…. My dog right behind her as she was aroused by the sound of a cat fight. My dog ran right over our own cat, grabbed the other cat and in one quick but violent shake killed the other cat right in front of us. I NEVER saw that coming. Not in a million years. She was over 6 yrs old by then and had never done anything aggressive. So while I love the breed , I know the power of instinct and the strength of these dogs. You don’t have to train a dog to kill….my example is true. I was a young female college kid who took my dog everywhere. From that point on I had to live with being very careful she never got near another cat (though she always remained fine with our own). She died of old age a few months before my first born…. Perhaps that was a blessing…. I don’t know…. All I’m saying is that a pit bull owner who says their dog could never, would never is not operating with a full knowledge of the breed. Things happen, their prey drive is strong, their bite style unique. I’m not saying a lab or a poodle might not have reacted the same way in the example cat fight… But I bet it wouldn’t have been fatal. People who own pits just need to be aware of the terrier mentality. The risk for a high prey drive reaction. They are not for everyone.

151 PROUD PIT OWNER July 23, 2010 at 10:16 AM

my pit would have licked that kid to death before bitting him , pits are great loyal dogs its all on the owner how they act

152 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 10:18 AM

Coco County has a no dog over 20lbs may be owned by a convicted felon law. That’s smart. Also- many Insurance carriers have dog exceptions – Allstate will not give new Homeowners policies to people who own Malamutes, Boxers, Amstaffs, Akitas, APBT, Huskies, Wolf Hybirds, Rottweilers, German Sheps, English Bulldogs, Mastiffs, Chows etc ad nauseum. Although they will make exceptions in some cases. Farmers requires a temperament test. What the Pitch Fork and Torch crowd here doesn’t get is that these people were not responsible- don’t take it out on the rest of us.

153 anon July 23, 2010 at 10:21 AM

Proud Pit Owner: I don’t want your dog anywhere near my kid. And, while some Pit Bulls are okay, too many are not.

154 No Bad Dogs July 23, 2010 at 10:25 AM

I would support a ban on un-altered dogs in Concord regardless of breed.

CPD would be allowed to make handful of nut checks without a warrant and without a Miranda Warning.

155 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 10:59 AM

HHHMMM, so the way to bring more people in to license (what’s the compliance rate in the county? probably not even 25%) is to make it so expesnsive that people that already don’t participate rush right out to do so? Why not make it easier to comply, and perhaps offer discounted training classes to those getting easier to afford licenses? I just don’t see where creating a system that causes an adversarial system to deal with pets is working. Once someone asked me if she should approve her neighbor getting a “St. Francis” terrier – I told her yes, because it would then give her someone to call if the dog wasn’t being cared for to a higher standard of care than a puppy they could get anywhere. Yesterdays tragedy was just that – but banning cars because they sometimes collide is just as stupid. There is probably a greater density of pitbulls in the area too – you’re not seeing the Karelian dog bear bites cos there aren’t any

156 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 11:25 AM

All these asinine comments re: ban a pit is like banning cars, guns and swimming pools, are laughable.
You have a choice whether to drive a car, shoot/own a gun and swim.
But you don’t have choices with a large mean dog with a death wish, bearing down on you.

We have all kinds of freedoms.We are free because of our heritage. But, we don’t have the FREEDOM to put other’s in danger. That is being an accomplice to murder.

When people grow up and take responsibility for themselves and their possessions, they will know living in a city, crowded up next to neighbors and kids and cats — is no place for a dog that deserves to be a one person pet, in the wide open spaces.

If you don’t have the proper facilities, get yourself a Yorkie or a Beagle. A Beagle can be vicious if that is what you desire, but he isn’t big enough to not be fought off.

My Aunt in Castro Valley had a biting poodle. After I gave her a swift kick in the jaw…she didn’t nip me again. A pit would have fought back.

Wake up~you can’t do everything you want, especially if it puts your family and/or neighbors in danger. If you do, you need mental help.
So stop with these silly analogies. You all sound like advocates for dog fights.

157 Karen Van Tuyl July 23, 2010 at 11:43 AM

- This a horrible tragedy. Yes! Banning Pit bulls is Co Co County or any where for that matter is utterly ridiculous.Breed Bans are illegal under the California Ag code- Unfortunately there is so much ignorance when it come to breeds, and pet ownership. It truly is a people problem. Get educated people Please!!!

158 Turkey July 23, 2010 at 12:03 PM

Why do we have so many pit bull attacks? Because of the volume of people who for some reason hold on to the myth that its the owner and not the breed. We don’t need studies or discussions on genes, their is no racist component here, just plain old common sense. We breed dogs for different traits and they show these traits without training, and no one has any problems with it except for pit bull owners and the traits of aggression. No one trains a dog to kill a child, yet children are killed, adults are killed, other animals are killed. Many pit bulls are treated like very loved pets, but they still attack and kill. Other breeds are abused, such as racing greyhounds, and they rarely if ever kill. Anyone who owns a dog should be for limitations on an animal who was bred to want to fight and kill your pet. If pit bull owners do not like those limitations, they have a choice: choose a different breed, or police their own to educate owners properly and stop attacks on innocent people. Punishments after the fact do not erase scars or bring pets back to life – we need prevention as pit bull owners have proven themselves incapable of owning pit bulls safely.

159 Christine Johnson July 23, 2010 at 12:09 PM

BSL is costly, ineffective, and unAmerican. Breed Specific Legislation refers to laws that judge dogs based on
physical appearance or breed, not individual actions or temperament.

BSL is costly. Cincinnati, OH taxpayers spent $160,000 a year trying to enforce a ban on Pit Bulls. The city of
Baltimore, MD spent $750,000 a year to enforce breed bans and restrictions. Baltimore got smart and repealed
their BSL in favor of non-breed specific laws.

BSL is ineffective. It gives citizens a false sense of security by claiming to target irresponsible owners and criminals.
In reality, the dogs most often affected by BSL are the licensed companion animals of responsible owners. These
dogs are easy to find because they are licensed. Criminals don’t license their dogs, so BSL is useless
in addressing the real problem. Like a stray bullet, BSL hits all the wrong targets. Criminals will continue to break the
law if Pit Bulls are outlawed. They will simply move on to the next breed. Adding insult to injury, BSL also depends
on non-breed experts to identify breeds. More than 25 breeds are often mistaken for Pit Bulls.

BSL is unAmerican. It violates our civil liberties. The 14th amendment of the constitution of the United States
guarantees us due process and equal protection under the law. Those in favor of BSL seek to tread on YOUR
RIGHT to own the breed of YOUR CHOICE.

BSL is the canine equivalent of racial profiling and is every bit as wrong.

160 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 12:54 PM

“BSL is the canine equivalent of racial profiling and is every bit as wrong.”

Simply stunning in how asinine this line of “reasoning” is.

161 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 1:05 PM

all you people who are agianst pitbulls are all cowards….”i cant walk down th streets without being afraid” good… stay inside nobody wants you around…..y do you think people get pitbulls there very friendly and also can b aggressive hhmmmm lets think about this great dog to have around famly and great to protect your home and property….wtf is wrong with that…..and tha majority of how a bully breed turns out is how much time and effort you put into training it properly….what you people are doing is racism for dogs and it rediclious…” lets kill the breed”…..seriously….i cant beleiv i hard that ….thats like saying lets kill all the black people….it jus shows how most people who really are…..and people like that are ganna a horrible death….save pitbulls lives….

162 to b rye July 23, 2010 at 1:07 PM

hey why dont you come by my place so i can kick the s##t out of you while my pitbull licks your face you clown

163 Antler July 23, 2010 at 1:12 PM

#136……You wrote “My body is always between the little kids and the dogs.” That statement cannot be true; you cannot ALWAYS be there. In my opinion, it’s time for you to face reality and place your dog elsewhere—–perhaps on a ranch, but not with a family which has children. Keep always in your mind the dejection and horror the step-grandfather expressed when he said that “We were ALWAYS careful to use the dead lock at the top of the garage door.” #136, it only takes ONCE. I’m begging you.

Another thing to consider is that it would have been possible for the 4-year-old to drag a chair to the garage door and to climb up to open it so they could “go play with the doggies”. I hope that the police will give lie detector tests to both the grandmother and the step-grandfather.

164 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 1:36 PM

Cats RULE and dogs drool, and kill.

165 dog lover July 23, 2010 at 1:44 PM

Mr. Mayor is fixing the vote. FYI

166 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 1:52 PM

163 why don’t you read things more closely before you go ape on someone Nowhere is it mentioned in136 that there are children in the house with the dogs she said when children run up to her and her dogs – my advice to parents is teach your kids not to run up to dogs.

167 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 2:09 PM

If you bother to read the actual news story, instead of just this blog, you’ll see that this was NOT the fault of the dog’s being pitbulls.

The owner adopted one pitbull from the pound, and SOMEHOW the dog had not been spayed at the pound (I haven’t heard of pounds not requiring spays in years), and had two puppies, one of which had shown signs of aggressive, but he just ~didn’t have the heart~ to take the aggressive one to the pound. He also didn’t have the money to spay the original dog, who had two MORE puppies, which he also refused to take to the pound.

On top of that and MOST IMPORTANTLY, the dogs were kept LOCKED IN A GARAGE ALL DAY, EVERY DAY. Of COURSE they were aggressive, they were locked in a hot, dark, cramped space with little human contact, little exercise, and little room to move around.

This is not the case of pitbulls being an aggressive breed. This is a case of a dumb and negligent owner.

168 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 2:10 PM

Mayor, please disregard the above post, I’m making a duplicate below, I forgot one thing.

169 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 2:11 PM

If you bother to read the actual news story, instead of just this blog, you’ll see that this was NOT the fault of the dog’s being pitbulls.

The owner adopted one pitbull from the pound, and SOMEHOW the dog had not been spayed at the pound (I haven’t heard of pounds not requiring spays in years), and had two puppies, one of which had shown signs of aggressive, but he just ~didn’t have the heart~ to take the aggressive one to the pound. He also didn’t have the money to spay the original dog, who had two MORE puppies, which he also refused to take to the pound.

On top of that and MOST IMPORTANTLY, the dogs were kept LOCKED IN A GARAGE ALL DAY, EVERY DAY. Of COURSE they were aggressive, they were locked in a hot, dark, cramped space with little human contact, little exercise, and little room to move around.

This is not the case of pitbulls being an aggressive breed. This is a case of a dumb and negligent owner.

And if the owner being dumb and negligent wasn’t enough, no one was watching the two year old! They let him out of their sight and it wasn’t until the four-year-old that can’t even speak noticed that the 2-year-old was missing that anyone even noticed something was wrong.

This is a case of unbelievably stupid humans, not a bad dog breed.

170 Mr. Mayor July 23, 2010 at 2:16 PM

I love dogs more than anybody. I even love pitbulls. I think you have to be careful with your children no matter what kind of dog you have. All animals can be dangerous. I wouldn’t own a pitbull though, but I do believe there are a lot of good homes out there for the pitbulls waiting to be adopted. I’m not a dog expert, just my opinion. If I were single with no children I probably would adopt a pit, just to give it a good home.

171 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 2:23 PM

This is not an either or -its both, a pits potential/propensity for fighting + an owner who couldn’t handle them = the mauling.

172 AnonEmouse July 23, 2010 at 2:45 PM

#165 NEVER!!! (unless it’s a poll about our councilwomen from roseville or poor financial decisions from the city) hehe :D

173 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 3:16 PM

people are so affraid !!! um obviously they never owned a pittbull i am a faithful owner of 2 pittbulls and i love them to death & i DO trust them around children because ive actually took the time to train them ! however pittbulls arent the only problem all dogs can be esp little dogs.. THEY BITE TOO!! there is a bunch of stereo typing going around & dogs have rights just as much as humans.. JUST IS NOT RIGHT!!

174 Pit Bull Owner July 23, 2010 at 3:21 PM

I have owned my Pit Bull Mix since she was 3 mos old and will turn 11 this year. She is a very sweet loving dog who is afraid of her own shadow. I once had to pull another dog off of her that attacked her, she would not defend herself.
Instead of banning Pit Bulls in Concord why not do what they do in SF make all Pit Bulls owners spay or neuter there dogs, which keeps them from being agressive.
I have seen many unneutered male dogs at the dog park of various breeds and think this is a very unsafe practice of putting any unneutered male dog in with multiple dogs. Example Doberman Pincher and Pit bull unneutered males turned loose in the dog park, turned into a fight. If you are going to ban anything ban unneutered and spayed dogs unless you have a special license ie to show the dogs.

175 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 3:46 PM

#110 I like:
No WIC for pit bull owners.
No affordable housing for pit bull owners.
No medical marijuana for pit bull owners.

And in Contra Costa County a convicted Felon cannot own ANY dog weighing over 20 pounds. Though generally it’s only after a raid on their home, and their dogs impounded, is the felon is made aware of it.

176 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 3:55 PM

@156 – You contradict your own argument! If I (we) have the right to own a gun, drive a car, smoke in public, then we “have the right” to put others in danger since each of these actions HAS THE POTENTIAL to cause harm to others. Owning ANY dog, similarly, has the potential to cause harm to others. All of these scenarios require PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY for one’s actions and for ensuring (to the best of one’s abilities) that harm does not come to others. Personal responsibility is the cost of freedom, one most true adults are happy to pay. I, for one, am not about to relinquish any freedom because others fail to take responsibility for their actions or their lives.

177 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 4:12 PM

If you banned pit bulls, the idiots who get them just to look tough would get dobermans and rotwiellers, instead. They’d still train them to be mean. It wouldn’t do any good. The problem is with the owners, not the breed.

178 Don July 23, 2010 at 4:32 PM

Any Dog can be fatal. I had taken a behavior class at marin humane and for a fee the owner can go have their Dog evaluated. and in some instances A Dog thats not good around children gets rehomed as such, or put down. but to say all pitbulls are bad is not right.check out http://www.badrap.com I had a beagle stay with me He wasn’t normal he would always try to bite. I warned the owners that when he fence fights he goes for your face , they didnt take me seriously > Two weeks later they told us thay had him put Down as the husband had to have a plastic surgeon put his upper lip back on. Better to be safe no matter what kind of Dog. maybe laws should be on a case by case basis but not just to outlaw a breed. As I have taken care of many good pitbull terriers

179 Don July 23, 2010 at 4:36 PM
180 PitsR4Fools July 23, 2010 at 4:44 PM

So much propaganda on these comments from those pit bull spammers the Washington Post wrote about http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/08/AR2007120800094.html . They turn out in force whenever you say ban or regulate. These are those with a vested interest in stopping any law that would protect people from these dangerous animals. Pits are mauling and killing in numbers like no other breed in history but these people don’t care about that, they are protecting their ill gotten incomes, incomes they pay no taxes on. And the “save them all” rescues fall right into bed with the dogmen and pit bull breeders with their lack of caring what happens to people, just save those pits. Check out a website that these people DON’T want you to see because the truth is there http://www.DogsBite.ORG And if you want to see just how bad the problem is look at all the media reports, less than a whole year, on http://www.pitattacksbystate.blogspot.com Try to find another breed that compares in numbers to what the pits are doing. PREVENT THE DEED, SAVE LIVES, REGULATE THE BREED. No family should have to attend a closed casket funeral.

181 Atticus Thraxx July 23, 2010 at 5:07 PM

Nope, no ban. Expensive Permit, steep penalties for scofflaws, and rigorous enforcement. This may be California, but enough with the banning shit.

182 Kristen July 23, 2010 at 5:23 PM

#66

A mauling starts with a bite. Do you deal with dogs on a regular basis?
Plus what are you going to do with the dogs that have Pitt in them. So if a dog is 1% pitt they can’t be allowed in Concord?

183 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 5:23 PM

“Before the tragedy, Hayashi said he had always believed that pit bull owners – and not the dogs themselves – were the problem.

“Well, I used to think that way,” he said. “That’s what got me into this mess, just thinking that they’re just regular dogs. I can understand a dog biting or nipping, but to maul somebody until he’s dead? To tear out somebody’s face?”"

Sound familiar? At least this guy is ‘now’ smarter than all the Pit Apologists here as he see’s the error in his ways.

It’s not the dogs fault that killing is in it’s nature, and yes it’s always the fault of the owner for bringing these killing machines into populated areas.

184 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 5:32 PM

Who the hell would want to own a dog, or any animal , that couldn’t be trusted to be left alone with another human without the fear the animal would maul that person to death?

I grew up with dogs all my life and have NEVER been in fear of losing my life or that the dog would kill someone. NEVER!. But then again I never owned or wanted to own a breed that has a ‘pattern’ of killing people.

So I guess all you who are against a ban are also against the ban that states we can’t keep a polar bear as a pet in the backyard.

185 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 5:45 PM

How bout you start to ban these things in Concord in this order:
Child Molesters
Gangs Members
Convicted Felons
Drug Dealers
Illegal Immigrants

Once you get rid of these things then maybe we can waste our time talking about a breed of dog.

186 Equal Rights July 23, 2010 at 5:58 PM

Are they banned in Rosevill and Navado ????

187 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 5:59 PM

# 182
Kristen

The ban on owning a dog that’s 100% wolf seems to be working. I believe you can only own one that’s less than 50% wolf.

Also, 100% of dogs do and will bite at some point in their life. However, 99.9% of these breeds will stop at biting and not continue on to the mauling stage. This is what all the Pit Apologists refuse to understand.

Biting is not equal to mauling

188 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 6:00 PM

Dogs that have been bred to kill for centuries will possibly kill, regardless of if they are raised in a loving family. It’s the ignorant people that will not accept this. Ban pit bulls, they are killers.

189 Dog Park Regular July 23, 2010 at 6:02 PM

You guys should be ashamed of yourselves. What would the Dog Whisperer think of you Pro Pit-Bull Banners.

Anon 7/23 5:45pm
you can add rattlesnakes and mountain lions to the list.

Don 4:36
Great site!

Be aware: If you bring yourself and your dog to a local claycord dog park, my pit will lick you to death.

190 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 6:18 PM

Dog Park Regular

Responsible Pit Bull owners never, never, let their dogs off leash. Same is true for those that adopt Greyhounds.

191 Dree July 23, 2010 at 6:26 PM

I applauded those of you who post to this kind of story with compassion and intelligence and not from ego. It’s easy to throw out an opinion as everyone has one especially on tough issues like this one. I’m glad there are a few people out there that are level headed, gracious and caring when they share their experiences in hopes to educate others. The world needs more like you. And I want to say thanks to all the people that step forward and get involved during the most difficult times in our lives

192 not atticus July 23, 2010 at 7:42 PM
193 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 8:19 PM

Why don’t we start with the one you have posted on this very page. I think, given this tragic event, you should make it a policy not to place adoption info on this page for pit bulls.

194 Three Questions July 23, 2010 at 9:06 PM

1. Is it really true that felons can’t own dogs over 20 pounds in Contra Costa County?

2. How much do Pit Bulls weigh?

3. How difficult would it be to enforce this law?

195 Anonymous July 23, 2010 at 9:48 PM

All dogs can become mean and violent under certain conditions, it’s their nature. Any dog that has to be “tied to a tree or a stake in the ground”, is going to have issues. Even under the best of conditions. It’s cruel. They go to the end of chain, usually running full speed, only to have their neck snapped back. Dogs can choke by getting their chain wrapped around the tree/stake numerous times. And there is a reason you have to tie them up. First of all, if you don’t have a secure yard for your dog to roam freely, you should not own one. I am speaking about med to large dogs, not lap dogs. I am a dog lover and have had many breeds over my lifetime, not once have I ever considered a pittbull or a dalmation. I have friends who own both and I don’t trust either breed. I was bit by a dalmation when I was 7, 42 years later, I still remember the day. The people that I see, that own pit’s always have the collars with the spikes that dig into the neck and are wearing more gold in the mouth than I have in my jewelry box. Status symbol maybe. Were these dogs current on their license, vacations? Doubt it.
#167, I agree 100%
I have not read all the posts, but who was keeping an eye on this little guy? At 2 years old I think my kids were still in a crib. Either way RIP little guy!

196 rubio July 23, 2010 at 10:45 PM

Haha, man do I get a kick out of the psychotic Pit Bull apologist crowd.

“I train my pit.”
Yeah right, like you’re all master dog trainers. Teaching your dog to sit & stay doesn’t mean you’ve “trained” the vicious instinct out of it…as if such a thing is even possible.

“Banning a breed is equal to racial profiling.”
Shit, although hard to conceive of such a notion, this is actually more stupid than the “I train” theme. First of all, it’s an f-ing dog, not a person. Second, racial profiling used to be called “good police work” until the ACLU and various ultra-PC-activist pain-in-the-ass types worked their “magic”. Car full of young black dudes driving around residential areas in Lafayette? Yeah, I think it might be a good idea for a cop to light ‘em up and ask them what they’re doing in the area. Same holds true for some white dude in a Saab cruising slowly down Cherry St. in Oakland.

197 JJ July 23, 2010 at 11:43 PM

Not all pit bulls are bad…I think it all depends on how they are raised.

198 Anonymous July 24, 2010 at 12:25 AM

i agree with Anonymous….. wich one you ask???? the world will never know! kinda like getting to the center of a lollipop.

199 AnonymousFool July 24, 2010 at 12:32 AM

i stuck my whole arm in my pits mouth and begged her to bite me… she whined then proceeded to lick my face! anyone who votes yes is an IDIOT!!!!!!

200 josh July 24, 2010 at 12:39 AM

not all pits are beasts if u vote yes ur retarted….i have been raised up around pits and never been attacke—————

201 Laurel July 24, 2010 at 6:37 AM

A ban addresses the wrong end of the leash.

202 Anonymous July 24, 2010 at 7:29 AM

josh, aka Pot,

“if u vote yes ur retarted”

Stop calling me black.

Sincerely,

Kettle

203 Mike July 24, 2010 at 7:39 AM

As the breed is diluted with more years away from fighting, there will surely be less intances as were sadly experienced. For now, let’s get these poor babies spayed and neutered. It surely is not their fault that they were irresponsibly bred, and often directly from currently fighting lines. Go after these vicious people who intentionally mistreat their animals to make them mean. Go after the horrid souls who will tape a “practice” dogs mouth shut and let other dogs nearly maul them to death repeatedly. For those of us who practice responsible ownership and training, and who understand that you never house two pitbulls of the same sex together, those who responsibly and diligently socialezed their dogs both with children and other dogs under constant supervision, for those of us who don’t really care that it’s a “put bull”, but understand that there is a soul inside that body, and are working toward saving a life and changing a breed’s reputation long-term, banning is not the answer.
I would be happy to get a permit for my pup, assuming the revenue could be used toward educating the public, and more importantly, toward shutting down fighting rings for good!

204 soshyviolet July 24, 2010 at 7:47 AM

BAN THE DEED (Irresponsible Owners) & NOT THE BREED

I own a 5 year old pit bull who I have SOCIALIZED, TRAINED, etc. We are allowed in our local Starbucks, Home Depot, and Blockbuster because he’s so well behaved. I’ve seen some ‘gnarly’ pit bulls. That is the result of bad breeding, back yard breeding. If you get a well-bred pit bull, you will get a dog that doesn’t have the aggression issues. BAN BACK YARD BREEDERS & STUPID OWNERS

205 anonymous July 24, 2010 at 7:52 AM

There is a reason that people choose to train pitbulls to fight and not pugs. And yes, it has a lot to do with genes. The dogs’, I mean.

206 soshyviolet July 24, 2010 at 8:13 AM
207 soshyviolet July 24, 2010 at 8:16 AM

God forbid the media ever talk about Pit Bulls who are HEROES:

http://dogsinthenews.com/stories/070301a.php

208 Suzi July 24, 2010 at 11:18 AM

Every day in California alone, people are killed due to drunk drivers, child abuse/neglect, guns, spousal abuse, etc. The National Canine Research Council (NCRC) reports that you have 5 times more chance of being struck by lightening than being bitten by a dog. The media seems hell bent on trashing these wonderful family pets. As a dog person, I’ve been bitten by a Golden Retriever, a Cocker Spaniel & a Pit Bull. The GR was mine, & the bite was NOT on purpose. The CS WAS on purpose & was a rescue. The PB was NOT an intentional bite either, just my own stupidity when I tried to break up a fight. Since learned that even a glass of water will break up a dog fight no matter what kind of dogs they are. The bottom line is PEOPLE MUST TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ANIMALS!!!!! Don’t blame the breed!

209 La Olgin July 24, 2010 at 12:03 PM

This is ridiculous, banning a breed of dog because some ignorant piece’s of garbage TRAIN them to behave in an agressive manner. Any one who has ever owned a pit bull terrier knows they have great demeanor’s and are loyal family pets. Any dog can be trained to be aggressive, so to all the people out there who think pit’s should be banned, may as well make a ban on all dog’s in Concord because they are “potentially” agressive/dangerous. Equality for all people, and animals alike!

210 Kristen July 24, 2010 at 4:54 PM

#187

How did the hybrid breed get invovled in this? Dogs will bite if they are scared or provoked. This is a tragic accident. But it was NOT the dogs fault. Those dogs were in the garage for a reason. Everybody need to ask, why? And since they were aggressive what got them to that point? THE OWNER AND HIS ACTIONS!! Plus shouldn’t there have been someone watching the two year old? ONCE AGAIN THE OWNER! The #1 breed to turn on someone and the owner is a Chow Chow. It’s just not in the press because everybody is on the “I hate Pitts” bandwagon. If people want to educate themselves, you should watch the Animal Planet special on the dogs they rescued from Michael Vicks home.

Also maybe people need to push the shelters, rescue groups, and pet stores to have free seminars on dogs. They do a different breed each time. And people can come and ask questions and get the 411 on a breed they are thinking about getting.

211 Anonymous July 24, 2010 at 5:03 PM

All of you people who are claiming pit bull should be banned because they were “trained to fight” need to do a little research before making these statements. Pit bulls have a high prey drive, much like MANY other dog breeds. The fact that they are sometimes “bred to fight” has NOTHING to do with whether a dog would attack a human. Not all pit bulls are bred to fight. In fact,if you see one out of a walk or in your neighbors backyard, there is a 98% chance they were NOT bred to fight. Dog fighters do not take care of their animals to the extent that they would take them out on a walk. When you talk about dog fighting, the dogs fight DOGS not people (I do not support dog fighting, just making a point). Pit bulls are not human aggressive dogs. If you come across or hear about a human aggressive pit bull it was most likely mixed with a human aggressive breed, like a German Shepard. Do some research on dogs. Terriers, retrievers, shepards, etc… all behave differently and need to be trained accordingly. For example, you wouldn’t buy a poodle to use to herd sheep.

I am the proud owner of a one year old APBT, belong to a responsible pit bull meet-up group of over 400 people, socialize him on a daily basis, and give him ample exercise, all of which I would expect any DOG owner to do. I know more Dachshunds that are human aggressive that pit bulls! They are just extremely unlikely to be able to kill someone. I’m afraid of them but don’t think we should ban them. People need to realize that the media only puts out negative stories on pit bulls and most of the time they are mixes, who just happen to look like pit bulls. Pit bulls are “scary” because of the social implication put on them. Pit bulls are like any other dog. Open your minds and stop only listening to the media as your source of truth.

212 a July 24, 2010 at 5:06 PM

All of you people who are claiming pit bull should be banned because they were “trained to fight” need to do a little research before making these statements. Pit bulls have a high prey drive, much like MANY other dog breeds. The fact that they are sometimes “bred to fight” has NOTHING to do with whether a dog would attack a human. Not all pit bulls are bred to fight. In fact,if you see one out of a walk or in your neighbors backyard, there is a 98% chance they were NOT bred to fight. Dog fighters do not take care of their animals to the extent that they would take them out on a walk. When you talk about dog fighting, the dogs fight DOGS not people (I do not support dog fighting, just making a point). Pit bulls are not human aggressive dogs. If you come across or hear about a human aggressive pit bull it was most likely mixed with a human aggressive breed, like a German Shepard. Do some research on dogs. Terriers, retrievers, shepards, etc… all behave differently and need to be trained accordingly. For example, you wouldn’t buy a poodle to use to herd sheep.

I am the proud owner of a one year old APBT, belong to a responsible pit bull meet-up group of over 400 people, socialize him on a daily basis, and give him ample exercise, all of which I would expect any DOG owner to do. I know more Dachshunds that are human aggressive that pit bulls! They are just extremely unlikely to be able to kill someone. I’m afraid of them but don’t think we should ban them. People need to realize that the media only puts out negative stories on pit bulls and most of the time they are mixes, who just happen to look like pit bulls. Pit bulls are “scary” because of the social implication put on them. Pit bulls are like any other dog. Open your minds and stop only listening to the media as your source of truth.

213 Anonymous July 24, 2010 at 6:27 PM

#7, what do you mean don’t give you that “it’s the owners crap”? it actually is the owners so you make no sense. true, pitbulls are more agressive by nature than most breeds but they can also be loving friendly pets that never kill or hurt anyone. the pitbulls that hurt/kill people were probably trained that way BY THEIR OWNERS. just like you can train a dog to sit, stay, fetch, you can train a dog to kill. bad, ignorant, irresponsible owners are the problem. clearly you have never met a nice pitbull OR a mean dog of any other breed. a golden retriever in this area recently attacked a child. but i suppose since that wasn’t a pitbull attack it isn’t the dog’s fault right? and you ask why anyone would want a pitbull? i personally want one because i love the breed, not because i want to “associate myself with those people”. that’s a stupid reason to get any kind of pet. and while i know there are bad pitbulls & bad pitbull owners i also know that they are actually friendly dogs, if trained/raised properly. hostile pitbulls come from hostile owners. saying it’s not the owner, it’s the dog is very ignorant in my opinion.

214 Antler July 24, 2010 at 7:20 PM

#209……..you and so many others are not “hearing” what we anti-pitbull folks are really saying. The breed itself was DEVELOPED so as to increase ON PURPOSE the physical and dispositional characteristics making it subject to rage triggers and “fighting to the death”. Professional breeders originally CULLED those pitbulls which would not fight, and they only bred the killers. That instinct is still in the breed!!! No amount of tender, loving care and no amount of training can remove the breed’s genetic propensity to be “set off” by something…….and you would be surprised at how small a thing can be a rage trigger. Many years ago, I leased a young pit bull which was prancing back and forth across the four lanes of Concord Boulevard as he visited in a friendly way with children walking home along sidewalks on both sides of the boulevard. He was very glad to be sweet-talked on leash into my backyard, where he played very nicely with our Brittanies. Time passes, and no one answers the ads in the paper. So my husband, an expert dog trainer and AKC field trial judge, started seriously working with “Tux” (so named because he was black and white in a distinctive pattern) on more advanced obedience training . The dog learned quickly and was dependably obedient, until one evening after the dogs had been fed and it was time to put them each in their own kennels. The Brittanys obeyed the command to “Kennel up, please!”. The pit bull did not obey; first he backed away from my husband and wagged his tail. Then my husband pointed toward the kennel and said, “Tux, kennel!!!” No response, except the pit bull stopped panting and extended his neck a little. Then my husband (who just like in all the apologists’ tales “never saw this cute young dog be anything but gentle”) commanded, “TUX!!! HERE!!!” So Tux attacked him!!! Fortunately, the biting did only minimal damage to one arm, and my husband was able to kick the dog repeatedly until he could grab the dog’s leather collar and twist it enough to subdue the animal, which he took the next day down to Animal Control and paid to have euthanized.

One more true pit bull story. We were outdoors at the Solano County Fairgrounds many years ago when our children were earning their Junior Handler points with several of our Brittanys in our breeds’ conformation ring. Hearing a vicious dog fight in the next ring over, I turned to see two pit bulls fighting and each of the professional handlers (you can tell because they always used to wear suits) BEATING his own dog with a long, thick baton. (As evidence that that kind of behavior happens frequently, every handler in the show ring carried a baton!) Evidently, when the judge awarded the placements for that class and the four top dogs were lined up in order,…..something triggered rage in one of the dogs and the other reacted in kind. Okay—-the fighting and beating was bad enough (and the following speaks to the point of viciousness being tolerated in that breed), but then the judges did not DISQUALIFY either dog!!!!! They got their third and fourth place rosettes. And the whole point of these AKC conformation shows is so other breeders can choose to what animals they might want to outbreed their own kennel line (i.e. a dog competing in an AKC sanctioned show must be purebred and must not be spayed nor neutered). In the case of this breed, it is the horrific consequences of what it MIGHT do, and do until its prey is DEAD. And the majority of UNPROVOKED and FATAL maulings nationwide indeed are attributable to the Pit Bull.

215 rob July 24, 2010 at 7:30 PM

All you’d have to do is let loose a pack of Japanese Akita’s and let them roam the streets and the PIt Bull problem will be solved?!

216 cjb July 25, 2010 at 12:50 AM

people only focus on the bad things pits have done!

what about the good? — http://www.pitbulllovers.com/pit-bulls-ten-things-you-should-know.html

pit bulls are #1 on the top 10 most dangerous dogs because they are strong, but they are not #1 on the top 10 most likely to bite! — http://sick-puppies.com/top-10-dogs-most-likely-to-bite-you/

217 BIGDOG76 July 25, 2010 at 4:17 PM

I see a lot of posts saying you can’t compare a breed of dog to a race of people, but it is the ignorance of the people voting in the ban, not what you are banning. History should have taught us that banning people/things doesn’t work (prohibition, nazi germany, gun laws, etc.) Hitler was kept in office with an 85% vote. This poll shows 60%, is that all the progress we’ve made in 70 years? Even in the past decade numerous cities, counties, states, and countries have implemented breed specific bans. In all cases with published before and after results, the only thing consistent is more money used to enforce and less revenue from licensing, many of the laws have been repealed.

It is hard to believe the prejudice and profiling that I see here. If it starts here it will be your favorite breed next, then all dogs. How long before it will be a race or group of people? Prejudice and ignorance combined with politics is a slippery slope. You should really think before you vote on any bans. After all our intelligence is what separates us from the dogs, as many people here are just as vicious as the worst dogs I’ve seen.

5 gallon buckets (with water) kill more children annually than all breeds of dogs combined.

It is education and responsibility that is needed. Before you make statements like they are bred to kill, it is in their DNA, etc. you should research the origins of the domestic dog which is a descendant of wolves who kill to eat. That is all breeds of dogs.

218 HJC.RVT July 26, 2010 at 9:17 PM

I think we should ban all dogs! Why not? Apparently owners aren’t the problem and I know the dogs aren’t the problem. So F it! Let’s go to the next level and just ban all pets! All you ignorant pit bull haters have never owned one (obviously) and you can’t get your head out of your ass for two seconds to see it’s not just pit bulls, it’s all breeds of large dog that are capable of doing damage to a human. Pit bulls don’t even have the strongest jaws! German shepards possess more pounds of pressure in their bite.

219 BIGDOG76 July 27, 2010 at 12:44 PM

@Antler I think we all hear what you “anti pit bull folks” are saying. It is similar to shat Hitler was saying in the 30′s in Germany. Ban/kill this breed/race and it will solve all of our problems. I would hope that people would be smarter than that now.

To your first point “Pit Bulls” are not “bred to kill”. They are bred for athleticism, size (small when bred for fighting 25-55 lbs.), determination, and loyalty. The main reason “pit bulls” were culled from breeding was if they bit a human. They may have been culled or otherwise removed from the yard if they did not win, but just to make room for another that might win. When fighting was legal there were rules and it was not always to the death, and certainly not designed to be to the death. Please do not misconstrue these statements to be in support of dog fighting as it is immoral and cruel.

If your husband was such a good trainer, he should have seen the bite coming as no dog attacks out of the blue. You can ask any knowledgeable trainer or behaviorist as well as many vets, there is always a warning and usually many warning prior to the bite. Most untrained owners don’t see the warnings which is why education of owners is the best solution.

All dogs, including your precious Brittanies come from the same gene pool, the Grey Wolf. All domesticated dogs are classified as Canis Lupus Familiaris and share very similar DNA. As such all dogs have the genetic propensity and background to kill and should be handled responsibly.

Finally the AKC, as they do to all breeds, has changed the APBT into the American Staffordshire Terrier and they are bred strictly for conformity by most AKC breeders. I did not see a mention of filed trials so I am assuming your Brittanies (a hunting breed) are also bred just for looks.
Your husband as a judge should know the regulations of the AKC. I don’t know of a registry that would not disqualify and possibly bar from future events any dog that caused a fight in the ring. Handlers beating their dogs with batons would also not be tolerated and they would likely be banned as well. I don’t do much AKC stuff as they destroy breeds of dogs through poor breeding, but I am aware of the rules. At a UKC or NKC event those dogs and handlers would have been disqualified and likely ejected from the show and possibly banned from future shows.

In conclusion I would have to say it is “all you anti pit bull folks” that are blindly ignoring the facts. I don’t care if you listen to what I am saying, just be smart enough to realize that genocide is not a good solution to the problem. Read about the origin and history of the domestic dog and the “pit bull” if you are going to speak publicly about them. Read what the CDC, HSUS, AVMA, APDT, and many other organizations have to say about this issue. All of these groups are apposed to breed bans. Look anywhere they have been implemented. The city/county/state loses money and there is no reduction in bite frequency or severity. A few places that have banned “pit bulls” later repeal the ban.

Everyone please think before you speak and definitely before you act. If you don’t know anything about “pit bulls” (other than mainstream media reports) please don’t post.

220 BIGDOG76 July 27, 2010 at 12:45 PM

Antler I think we all hear what you “anti pit bull folks” are saying. It is similar to shat Hitler was saying in the 30′s in Germany. Ban/kill this breed/race and it will solve all of our problems. I would hope that people would be smarter than that now.

To your first point “Pit Bulls” are not “bred to kill”. They are bred for athleticism, size (small when bred for fighting 25-55 lbs.), determination, and loyalty. The main reason “pit bulls” were culled from breeding was if they bit a human. They may have been culled or otherwise removed from the yard if they did not win, but just to make room for another that might win. When fighting was legal there were rules and it was not always to the death, and certainly not designed to be to the death. Please do not misconstrue these statements to be in support of dog fighting as it is immoral and cruel.

If your husband was such a good trainer, he should have seen the bite coming as no dog attacks out of the blue. You can ask any knowledgeable trainer or behaviorist as well as many vets, there is always a warning and usually many warning prior to the bite. Most untrained owners don’t see the warnings which is why education of owners is the best solution.

All dogs, including your precious Brittanies come from the same gene pool, the Grey Wolf. All domesticated dogs are classified as Canis Lupus Familiaris and share very similar DNA. As such all dogs have the genetic propensity and background to kill and should be handled responsibly.

Finally the AKC, as they do to all breeds, has changed the APBT into the American Staffordshire Terrier and they are bred strictly for conformity by most AKC breeders. I did not see a mention of filed trials so I am assuming your Brittanies (a hunting breed) are also bred just for looks.
Your husband as a judge should know the regulations of the AKC. I don’t know of a registry that would not disqualify and possibly bar from future events any dog that caused a fight in the ring. Handlers beating their dogs with batons would also not be tolerated and they would likely be banned as well. I don’t do much AKC stuff as they destroy breeds of dogs through poor breeding, but I am aware of the rules. At a UKC or NKC event those dogs and handlers would have been disqualified and likely ejected from the show and possibly banned from future shows.

In conclusion I would have to say it is “all you anti pit bull folks” that are blindly ignoring the facts. I don’t care if you listen to what I am saying, just be smart enough to realize that genocide is not a good solution to the problem. Read about the origin and history of the domestic dog and the “pit bull” if you are going to speak publicly about them. Read what the CDC, HSUS, AVMA, APDT, and many other organizations have to say about this issue. All of these groups are apposed to breed bans. Look anywhere they have been implemented. The city/county/state loses money and there is no reduction in bite frequency or severity. A few places that have banned “pit bulls” later repeal the ban.

Everyone please think before you speak and definitely before you act. If you don’t know anything about “pit bulls” (other than mainstream media reports) please don’t post.

221 Rachel H July 30, 2010 at 7:36 AM

I was raised in Concord. I have a pit bull. I also have an infant. My pit bull does well with my infant because she is trained, well loved, spayed and part of our family.

Some piece of crap dog fighter who leaves his intact dogs in a garage is going to ruin it for people like me. I adopted my girl because she passed her temperament tests and was highly recommended from a reputable rescue. Eight years later, she is still the love of my life.

Doctors and lawyers own pit bulls. Are those really the type of people you’re trying to deter from moving to Concord? Because that is what my doctor husband and my lawyer self are thinking since we were actually considering Concord as a viable place to move and open my husband’s new practice. I guess we’ll stick with Martinez afterall.

222 Chef David Edelstein and Team Pit-a-Full July 30, 2010 at 9:20 AM

Never mind the fact that out-and-out bans on any one particular breed of dog are against the law in the state of Calif, I was always under the impression that people in Calif were a bit more enlightened and “with it” than folks in places like Denver, CO where they have had a COSTLY and ineffective ban on the breed for over 20 years.
I believe… legislators should, instead of worrying so much about their careers and votes, should focus more on genuine public safety. The bulk of this concern involves going after individual owners and holding them accountable for the damage their property/ dog has caused and not passing all blanketing laws that stereotype an entire breed and their owner… guilty or not.
Though most Americans suffer from short attention spans, not so long ago there were people and theories that passed judgment and stereotyped an entire social group (ie McCarthyism, The Holocaust, Salem Witch Hunts, etc). With modern medicine, satellite technology, and the internet… one would think we have evolved past such Dark Age mentality.

Chef David Edelstein
& Team Pit-a-Full
Orange, CA

223 Chef David Edelstein July 30, 2010 at 9:38 AM

PS… Here are a few pieces of media the haters and skeptics might want to sink their teeth into. Its not speculation, its not hear say, its not prediction… it is the professional view of some people who do “dogs” every day for a living:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SB5xn24pTg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vic5o3D_LRU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ms5WyWHXeg

(Note… the three Pit Bulls roaming around in the background are mine. Pay particularly close attention to them for ANY signs of aggression, ANY signs of fight or flight, or even something as subtle as their hackles up for any reason. You wont find any… because they are THAT GOOD.
All three are rescues, all three are highly socialized (with people and other animals), get alot of exercise, they dont have any medical needs, they are all spay’d/neutered, micro chipped, have all their immunizations, their diet could not be more top shelf, they are NEVER allowed to engage in ANY activity that encourages or fosters aggression (ie weight pulling, spring poles, etc) they are ALWAYS supervised and/or kept in a safe enclosure, and they are accepted and loved very much by their family and everyone who meets them.
These dogs are not unique as the majority of pit bulls and their owners share these same traits and qualities. The minority are the irresponsible owners who make all the headlines and get all the attention from kneejerk reaction prone city officials…. like in Concord, CA

224 hitchabout July 30, 2010 at 9:39 AM

it wasn’t the dogs fault the owner raised them wrong, left along with the kids without supervision or they were teased or provoked by the kids. it’s most likely a human error in training or being unsupervised around the kids. this would not get this much attention if they were Labradors or Poodles, this is a good way to strike fear in the heart of those people that never met a goodhearted Pit Bull before.

225 Sarah July 30, 2010 at 10:36 AM

Education people!! That is where you will find a solution….not by banning any breed! As someone else said, pit bulls, like any other breed need to be treated as a member of the family, and not a weapon. I have owned a few so called “bully breeds”, and now own a lab/pit mix. I will tell you that I have never had a problem with any of them, they all have been some of the most loveable dogs I have ever known. People need to realize that when they bring a dog into their home, they are ultimately responsible for teaching the dog acceptable vs. non acceptable behavior. Owners seem to be more of the problem than the dogs! I have to agree with what hitchabout said, it is most likely human error in training or being unsupervised around kids. They are a very loveable breed, and deserve a chance like any other breed. Also socializing them at a very early age makes a difference, along with formal obedience classes!

226 Karen Peyton July 30, 2010 at 10:42 AM

It sadness me that once again we blame the thing that is not in change. Pitbulls are not to blame for the violence humans are. Pitbulls are a very smart loyal breed that have the nick name “Nanny breed” Look up why!! Helen Keller had a Pit for her service dog. Do you homework. Yes maybe people should be licensed to own a pit like you are licensed to own a gun. That way these great dogs would only be allowed to be owned by loving responsible people that know what they have and respect it. Don’t punish the dog, punish the man!! Just like children, a dog is a reflection of its owner/parent!

227 Lianna July 30, 2010 at 1:39 PM

The problem is not the breed but the people that own them. Do not blame the breed when the owners decide how they want to raise the individual dog. It would be like banning an entire race of people from a city. That is considered discrimination and is against the law..so should be banning a breed from a city because of a few poorly raised dogs. The owners should be the one’s to get in trouble..not the dogs.

228 D4dogs July 30, 2010 at 3:00 PM

I love how there’s the discussion of “pit Bulls” when there is not even a breed “Pit Bull”. It is a group of breeds (Staffordshire Terriers, Am Staffs, American Bulldog, and APBT) that make up the commonly referred “Pit Bull”. So, now that you banning fans are slightly more educated, get your heads out of your posteriors and look at facts. Ban Pitties, then which breed will these people go to next? Something bigger, scarier, more easily trained to aggression? Bans have been PROVEN not to work. England has had a ban in place for over 15 years – dog bites are UP more than ever. Gee, I wonder why? OWNERS, you morons! And, BTW, guess who has climbed steadily up the ranks in dog bites statistics . . . .ready? Labs! That’s right the “oh it would never hurt a fly” labrador. It’s a function of popularity of the breed and nothing more as to which breed bites “most”. And while we’re looking at the top vicious breeds – dauchunds lead that list, followed by chihuahuas and the Jack Russel terriers – they are most likely to BITE. Look it up! The media will use anything to stir up controversy to make money – they are not interested in FACTS or lab bites would be reported with equal frequency and outrage. But that doesn’t sell papers or air time.

229 responsible dog owner July 30, 2010 at 3:56 PM

Ok everyone. I think if you compile a list of the # of dog attacks (ALL breeds) for one year and then compile a list of the # of people killed or injured due to alcohol you will find that the # for alcohol is 10X that of dog attacks. So if you want to ban something that is a threat to public safety start with ALCOHOL!!

98% of the human population should not own a dog of ANY breed. I work with, train and show rottweilers. I see irresponsibility with dogs of all breeds EVERY day. people have no idea how to co-exist with dogs of any breed. Dogs are expected to behave with more common sense than the people who own them! My dogs are ALL well socialized and trained, including one who is a certified therapy dog. But I would NEVER leave a small child unattended with my dogs. At any moment that child could do something that will trigger prey drive and pack drive in the dogs…ANY dog…ANY breed! It happens VERY fast. it is a hardwired instinct in ALL dogs. Even a pack of Chihuahuas can severly injure or kill a small child.

Sadly the media is our worst enemy. MILLIONS of pit bulls, rottweilers, dobermans etc live in our society, never causing a problem, never having a “bad moment” BUT the media NEVER reports on these dogs. They go un-noticed. It doesn’t make good news to report on a well behaved dog! But 1 single pit bull attacks and it is all over every news station across the US, front page news and the WHOLE breed suddenly is bad! 1, 2 or even a 100 dogs out of a million does not make the breed bad.

As I stated before far more people are killed every year due to alcohol than to dog attacks over a 20 year period. Go to a UKC show and watch 50 pitbulls all intact co-mingling amongst each other without so much as a hair raised. But then look at the other end of the leash and see people who train and socialize their dogs, none who would allow a child to be unattended around 1 dog much less 5 of ANY breed!

230 BullyLover July 30, 2010 at 5:25 PM

OK, go ahead and ignore state law. First and foremost, BSL do not work and cost enormous amounts of money, Second, why does everyone ignore the fact that obviously the dogs were not pets as they were in the garage and there were three of them. Has anyone asked why that is? What sort of socialization had these animals had? How long did the owner have them? These are questions that everyone needs to ask. I personnaly hate little dogs, Every little dog owner I know thinks its absolutely ok to have a anti social aggressive mean dog and it apparently is ok because it is a little? You do realize that they still have teeth and maybe they cant kill but they can disfigure, Because of my experience with small dogs should I request they be banned? Check out the resent repealed ban by Italy. They had almost 90 breeds banned, including Welsh Corgi’s. See what happens when you ban one breed. today my breed, tomorrow yours.

231 containerguy July 30, 2010 at 7:54 PM

This law will never happen BAN the owner too… does that sound realistic
how about kill the jerk that was lazy and selfish 5 pit bulls ? he is a moron and should be kept behind bars OR force him to go out and tell people what he did and what the out come is from recklessness on the birth day of the child that he killed .

232 No Name July 30, 2010 at 8:52 PM

Ignorance is so sad. The media can portray anything they way they want it. They can report what they want as well as not report what wont get attention. People need to educate themselves. Its sad when society chooses to educate themselves through the media who twists things in any way they want to. There area many dog bit/attack incidents daily. Many are not reported. For the ones that are reported if it is not a story that may not draw a bunch of attention the media is not going to put the spotlight on the story. The media is only going to put out there what will get the publics attention… Which lets face it people feed off this garbage. The sicker and more twisted it sounds the more people eat it up. Its sickening and disturbing…

233 Anonymous July 30, 2010 at 9:07 PM

As a Vet Tech It would bring much saddness to me as well to any of the people that I work with (yes including the veternarians) to see something like this acutally pass. We work with hundreds of different breeds a day and I must say that the pitbull is the least of any of our concerns. They are a joy to be around as well as a joy to work with. Education is key here

234 pitbull_lover July 31, 2010 at 1:27 AM

hi ok 1 thing is i rescue pitbulls and have for over 14yrs and none of mine have bit anyone or anything but guess what some of the mean pits that are out here is inbred or cross bred like son and mother or father daughter or sister brother ect and i dont like to hear about anyone dieing from being attack but again not the breeds fault ,,,,,,,,,,, i have some real sweet pitbulls and i have 1 right now i rescue off the net and she is something else i have to have her in the house with me at all times she is a good girl unless someone comes to my house i always put all my pits in cages when people are around to many people and they get upset and i dont take a chance at all i had 1 just pass 2 yrs ago aand he was raised with my nephew and my nephew would lay on him and pull his ears anything and everything u can think of he would do to him and jumpingjackflash never even tried to bite him or anyone but i just put hm up to be safe and i had a female pit and she slept with hm and if i was to try and wake my nephew up she would protect him from me and she was murder and another 1 of mine was murder right before fathers day 2010 and they did nothin to know one and tehy are dead now ,,,u never know when a dog has a tooth ache or ear ache or just some kind of pain so why leave a small child or infant around with no one ther to watch tehm and ther is more then just pitbulls that will tear up a person but hell no ya dont see them in the paper on the tv and u dont see them shot and ya dont hear about it so think before ya kill any dog hey i have been for many years rescueing pitbulls on my own and i want to learn more about them everyday i read alot of stuff on the net and i will get in to chat groups and still till this day i will ask for more info on them please do not ban the pitbulls

235 Tom July 31, 2010 at 7:35 AM

If there is going to be a ban it should be on the people who cause these beautiful animals to do the terrible things. When trained appropriately, pit bulls are the sweetest, most loving dogs on the planet. When inappripriately trained and mistreated and abused, they can also be dangerous. I would be the same way if I were to be mistreated the way some of these “fighting dogs” (please excuse the inappropriate and derogatory term) are. We as a society need to solve the problem where it starts, not simply chastise the entire breed because of the bad eggs of their owners human species. It is society that is the problem, not the dogs.

236 jfergie July 31, 2010 at 8:17 AM

I volunteer in an animal shelter 5 days a week. We have many pit bulls brought in for various reasons and the vast majority of them are sweet dogs. It is the idiot owners who are to blame for the problems the dogs get into. My granddaughter has been raised with two pit bulls who have never harmed her. She even got in their kennels with them when she was littler and took food away from them. But they were also never starved or beaten. My experience is that the breed is high energy so they need exercise regularly and good quality food. Is that what those garage dogs were getting? I’d bet NOT!

237 Pariah July 31, 2010 at 1:12 PM

Why would someone want a Pit some ask.
I would have said that 8 years ago. I was put in the position of either fostering a pit for awhile or seeing her go off to be put down because my wife’s son had abandoned her.
At the time all I knew about Pis was what I had heard which was nothing good.
Well… One week ran into another and I came to see what a really sweet dog this “viscous killer” was and to make a long story short that was 8 years ago and I still have that Pit and she has been the best dog I have ever had. She is incredibly sweet and loving and I also have a cat which she gets on with perfectly, they even nap together.
Over the years I have educated myself about Pits and learned about them. Pits are not dangerous dogs but they are the most abused breed of dogs.
Pits don’t deserve hate, they deserve to be rescued from the fighters who abuse them.

238 anonymous July 31, 2010 at 3:35 PM

If the child had been killed by a Golden Retriever, would everyone suddenly be demanding that Golden Retrievers be outlawed? Pit Bulls are not the only breed that has ever killed or bitten a person – any large powerful breed is capable of that. Banning breeds does nothing to prevent these situations. Dog owners of all breeds must be held accountable for the way they treat their animals and for the actions of their animals. The Pit Bull issue is a man-made problem and the media hype perpetuating the stereo-types does nothing but add to the cache for people who want a dog to mistreat and weaponize.

239 Proud Pit Bull Momma July 31, 2010 at 4:00 PM

I find myself asking two questions to this situation 1. When the person breeding this dog in an agressive manner, why didn’t the neighbors or anyone call the spca or police? 2. What was this child doing to provoke this dog? More often then not, people are to blame in more ways then one.
I would pray that everyone in this situation looks from all angles. Blessings.

240 Cari August 3, 2010 at 3:32 AM

Breed-specific legislation doesn’t tend to help; cracking down on the people who are ALREADY pursuing illegal activities (dog fighting, drug dealing, etc) is the only way to deal with it. “Pit bull” isn’t even a breed; it’s a label that can include four or five breeds “…and mixes thereof” in a lot of laws and media hype; does that mean my rescue mutt could be confiscated and put down because his *markings* are similar to an American Staffordshire? In some cities with breed-specific laws, it does. Some “dog warden” can say “Hey, that looks like a pit bull to me,” and TAKE MY DOG.

From Antler – “#209……..you and so many others are not “hearing” what we anti-pitbull folks are really saying. The breed itself was DEVELOPED so as to increase ON PURPOSE the physical and dispositional characteristics making it subject to rage triggers and “fighting to the death”. Professional breeders originally CULLED those pitbulls which would not fight, and they only bred the killers. That instinct is still in the breed!!! No amount of tender, loving care and no amount of training can remove the breed’s genetic propensity to be “set off” by something……”

That can be said of quite a number of breeds; most dog breeds were bred to be aggressive toward SOME kind of animal, be it birds, rodents, rats or other dogs. Terriers were bred to go after animals that burrow, hence the name. Interestingly enough, while breeder of “fighting” dogs were breeding IN aggression toward other *dogs*, they were systematically breeding OUT any aggression toward humans–so the “breed’s genetic propensity” has pretty much nothing to do with attacking even a small, vulnerable human. The bully breeds are actually the breeds that are KNOWN for their affection towards humans and even strangers… *except* when owners train them to be “guard dogs” and keep them in numbers, as some kind of tough guy status symbol.

And of course I agree with several people who have already said this: letting a child go anywhere near ANY dogs without supervision is just plain wrong. I wouldn’t bring someone’s baby into my house and let it WANDER AROUND to encounter danger! whether that’s in the form of my murderous electrical sockets, my obviously aggressive kitchen stove, my VERY dangerous gas grill, or my two dogs.

In our family, the pretty hound-pointer mix is the one we have to keep an eye on; the worst my Boxer-AmStaff mutt will do is LICK you to death! I think if someone came to steal the TV, he’d probably go up to the intruder with a wagging tail.

Punish the deed; punish the negligence that allowed this ragedy to occur; punish the guy who owned FIVE dogs and let a kid wander around without supervision in his home. But don’t pass a law that punishes the GOOD owners and GOOD dogs out there. If anything, pass a law that requires education for ANYONE owning a dog, or parrot, or tiger, or ANY OTHER potentially dangerous household pet. Pursue more aggressive spaying and neutering laws. Pursue more aggressive pursuit of illegal breeding and dogfighting operations. Because honestly, the “pit bull” problem isn’t going to be stopped by BSL; the people causing the “pit bull” problem are, for the most part, people who aren’t really concerned with obeying laws in the first place (dog fighting is a felony here, I believe.) Dogs attack people for any number of reasons, and in the vast majority of cases those reasons are NOT genetic.

241 Stacia August 3, 2010 at 9:17 AM

Ban the OWNER not the Pit Bull.

LISTEN UP!!!!

Know you dog!!!! If you know your dog (any breed) is a little aggressive towards dogs don’t take it to a dog park. If you know your dog (any breed) is aggressive toward people don’t let it around people. If your dog has these issues you MUST work with the dog and if you don’t have the time then DON’T OWN A DOG

A Pit Bull is all about pleasing its owner. If a Pit Bull is raised to be mean then it will be mean to please its owner. If a Pit Bull is raised to be sweet then it will be sweet to please its owner.

242 Amanda August 4, 2010 at 11:07 AM

People should be banned, the idiot worthless individuals who agree with BSL should be banned!!! Those who mistreat a dog or any animal…should be banned!!! It’s nothing but pure ignorance of those who dont understand these dogs. I have a Pit Bull and she is the best baby in the world, and the person who said take their teeth out? I am sorry but you are an IDIOT!!! You obviously are ignorant as well, its THE WAY THE ANIMAL IS RAISED THAT DETERMINES THE TEMPERMENT!!! Punish the deed not the breed. People make me absolutely disgusted I dont understand. Here’s a scenario of how a pit bull is made mean: take a puppy about 6 weeks old, put him or her in a cage, beat them daily, starve them, give them no attention, toys or love. Put the cage in a dark room and give them zero contact then show them to an aggressive dog when the puppy reaches a year old. You honestly think that dog isnt going to fight? Especially if it means he or she might get food afterwords? Then when the dog has fought toss them in the cage, wounds open and bleeding, in incredibly horrific pain and leave them to suffer. NOW that makes them mean!!! The people who do that are SICK and deserve to same treatment. Like any other dog, take my Bella (yes full blooded pit bull) and raise her around people, kids, babies adults other dogs and animals and I promise you she is the sweetest and loveable girl ever. She would never harm anyone!!! Think about this BSL supporters~ do the above to a human child and tell me if they are mean. DO your RESEARCH and then FORM an opinion!!! I will always support pit bulls ALWAYS. For those of you who don’t~ you are missing out on love, tons of kisses, an oversized lap dog who wants nothing more than you to love them back.

243 mitchell August 5, 2010 at 5:51 AM

i agree. i rescued a pitbull, and she couldnt be sweeter. its not the pit bulls that are the problem, its irresponsible owners. every dog out there has the potential to be dangerous, and no one more than the other. if it were a chiuaua, would you be putting a ban out on them. sounds a little ridiculous now, doesnt it?

244 Timtim August 17, 2010 at 1:52 PM

Insert “African American” and all the appropriate forms of it in place of “pitbull” in this debate, and you have a conversation that very well may have taken place in 1950… why do i own a pit bull? they’re a beautiful breed, why do you own a cocker spaniel? a good owner of any animal wouldn’t say “yeah she goes crazy sometimes” and blow it off. animals dont have the same rights, just like certain races of people didn’t have the same rights years ago… have you already forgotten that back then “colored folk” were compared to dogs? you might not be able to compare a dog to a race now, but the similarities between the fights are undeniable. oh,and by the way, as a police officer, i will take my dog and leave. you dont deserve for me to put my life on the line for you when you dont want me and my dog here.

245 timtim hater August 17, 2010 at 3:42 PM

Timtim,
Upon reading your post #244, I can see your lack of education and use of the English language.
This leads me to believe one of two things;
1. You are not really a police officer, but want us to think you are providing you with a false sense of power and or knowledge.
2. You are a police officer and governments have drastically lowered the standards for becoming one. Are we really that desperate?
So, lets pretend for a moment that you really are a cop…………….

A dog is a dog, is a dog.
All have potential to become good and bad, same as people.
When raised with discipline and love, dogs can be wonderful, same as people.
When raised to be fearful, hateful and vicious, dogs can be bad, same as people.
Who raised you to be so fearful, hateful and vicious that you will negate your sworn duty and refuse to protect and defend those citizens who pay your salary which supports you and your family AND YOUR DOGS, simply because their opinion differs from yours? HOW DARE YOU!!!!
Back in the day you would be called a PIG, and rightly so.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: